-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Comparison of Modern Drinking Water Network Maintenance Methods: Evaluation of Removed Deposits in the Form of Total Suspended Solids (TSS)
P. Jurek Vidlářová, S. Heviánková
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2004
PubMed Central
od 2005
Europe PubMed Central
od 2005
ProQuest Central
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2004-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2005-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2008-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2009-01-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2004
PubMed
33921692
DOI
10.3390/ijerph18084311
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- kovy MeSH
- mikrobiologie vody MeSH
- pitná voda * MeSH
- zásobování vodou MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Water pipe sediment removal should be implemented as an integral part of water mains maintenance in order to steadily supply consumers with drinking water of high quality. Considering the number of different water pipe sediment removal methods, the article aims to evaluate the currently used methods to remove water pipe sediment from the pipes of the drinking water distribution system. The evaluation compares the implementation requirements of each method as well as the quality and the quantity of the removed products. The tested methods were unidirectional flushing, Comprex®, and Ice Pigging®. The results of the comparison are expressed in terms of total suspended solids (TSS) recovery, metals mass concentration and water consumption. Since contamination can settle along the entire surface of the pipeline, it is most appropriate to recalculate the results per unit area of the pipeline. The results point at the following efficiency the Comprex® method was the most efficient in removing TSS, Ice Pigging® was the next and unidirectional flushing removed a negligible amount of TSS compared to the other two methods. The absolute recovery of TSS was 0.12-3.01 g·m-2 in unidirectional flushing of plastic pipes, 1.58-8.54 g·m-2 in unidirectional flushing of metal pipes, 4.36-47.53 g·m-2 in Ice Pigging®, and 5.19-69.23 g·m-2 in Comprex®. The composition of the sediment was strongly influenced by particle origin: Pipe material affected the crystalline phase of the sediment and the water source and the age of the pipe affected the amorphous phase of the sediment. Therefore, it was found that evaluation of efficiency based on the amount of TSS removed is only suitable for sites that meet the same conditions as pipe material, water source and ideally the pipe age. It has further been found that the Comprex® method can be advantageously used in real conditions to clean pipes with insufficient hydraulic conditions (such as with a high level of incrustation), as the cleaning has low water flow velocity requirements.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21018811
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210830100357.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210728s2021 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/ijerph18084311 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33921692
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Jurek Vidlářová, Petra $u Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Mining and Geology, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Comparison of Modern Drinking Water Network Maintenance Methods: Evaluation of Removed Deposits in the Form of Total Suspended Solids (TSS) / $c P. Jurek Vidlářová, S. Heviánková
- 520 9_
- $a Water pipe sediment removal should be implemented as an integral part of water mains maintenance in order to steadily supply consumers with drinking water of high quality. Considering the number of different water pipe sediment removal methods, the article aims to evaluate the currently used methods to remove water pipe sediment from the pipes of the drinking water distribution system. The evaluation compares the implementation requirements of each method as well as the quality and the quantity of the removed products. The tested methods were unidirectional flushing, Comprex®, and Ice Pigging®. The results of the comparison are expressed in terms of total suspended solids (TSS) recovery, metals mass concentration and water consumption. Since contamination can settle along the entire surface of the pipeline, it is most appropriate to recalculate the results per unit area of the pipeline. The results point at the following efficiency the Comprex® method was the most efficient in removing TSS, Ice Pigging® was the next and unidirectional flushing removed a negligible amount of TSS compared to the other two methods. The absolute recovery of TSS was 0.12-3.01 g·m-2 in unidirectional flushing of plastic pipes, 1.58-8.54 g·m-2 in unidirectional flushing of metal pipes, 4.36-47.53 g·m-2 in Ice Pigging®, and 5.19-69.23 g·m-2 in Comprex®. The composition of the sediment was strongly influenced by particle origin: Pipe material affected the crystalline phase of the sediment and the water source and the age of the pipe affected the amorphous phase of the sediment. Therefore, it was found that evaluation of efficiency based on the amount of TSS removed is only suitable for sites that meet the same conditions as pipe material, water source and ideally the pipe age. It has further been found that the Comprex® method can be advantageously used in real conditions to clean pipes with insufficient hydraulic conditions (such as with a high level of incrustation), as the cleaning has low water flow velocity requirements.
- 650 12
- $a pitná voda $7 D060766
- 650 _2
- $a kovy $7 D008670
- 650 _2
- $a mikrobiologie vody $7 D014871
- 650 _2
- $a zásobování vodou $7 D014881
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Heviánková, Silvie $u Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Mining and Geology, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00176090 $t International journal of environmental research and public health $x 1660-4601 $g Roč. 18, č. 8 (2021)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33921692 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210728 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210830100357 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1689790 $s 1139257
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 18 $c 8 $e 20210419 $i 1660-4601 $m International journal of environmental research and public health $n Int. j. environ. res. public health $x MED00176090
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210728