Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Comparison of Modern Drinking Water Network Maintenance Methods: Evaluation of Removed Deposits in the Form of Total Suspended Solids (TSS)

P. Jurek Vidlářová, S. Heviánková

. 2021 ; 18 (8) : . [pub] 20210419

Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21018811

Water pipe sediment removal should be implemented as an integral part of water mains maintenance in order to steadily supply consumers with drinking water of high quality. Considering the number of different water pipe sediment removal methods, the article aims to evaluate the currently used methods to remove water pipe sediment from the pipes of the drinking water distribution system. The evaluation compares the implementation requirements of each method as well as the quality and the quantity of the removed products. The tested methods were unidirectional flushing, Comprex®, and Ice Pigging®. The results of the comparison are expressed in terms of total suspended solids (TSS) recovery, metals mass concentration and water consumption. Since contamination can settle along the entire surface of the pipeline, it is most appropriate to recalculate the results per unit area of the pipeline. The results point at the following efficiency the Comprex® method was the most efficient in removing TSS, Ice Pigging® was the next and unidirectional flushing removed a negligible amount of TSS compared to the other two methods. The absolute recovery of TSS was 0.12-3.01 g·m-2 in unidirectional flushing of plastic pipes, 1.58-8.54 g·m-2 in unidirectional flushing of metal pipes, 4.36-47.53 g·m-2 in Ice Pigging®, and 5.19-69.23 g·m-2 in Comprex®. The composition of the sediment was strongly influenced by particle origin: Pipe material affected the crystalline phase of the sediment and the water source and the age of the pipe affected the amorphous phase of the sediment. Therefore, it was found that evaluation of efficiency based on the amount of TSS removed is only suitable for sites that meet the same conditions as pipe material, water source and ideally the pipe age. It has further been found that the Comprex® method can be advantageously used in real conditions to clean pipes with insufficient hydraulic conditions (such as with a high level of incrustation), as the cleaning has low water flow velocity requirements.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21018811
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210830100357.0
007      
ta
008      
210728s2021 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3390/ijerph18084311 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33921692
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Jurek Vidlářová, Petra $u Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Mining and Geology, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Comparison of Modern Drinking Water Network Maintenance Methods: Evaluation of Removed Deposits in the Form of Total Suspended Solids (TSS) / $c P. Jurek Vidlářová, S. Heviánková
520    9_
$a Water pipe sediment removal should be implemented as an integral part of water mains maintenance in order to steadily supply consumers with drinking water of high quality. Considering the number of different water pipe sediment removal methods, the article aims to evaluate the currently used methods to remove water pipe sediment from the pipes of the drinking water distribution system. The evaluation compares the implementation requirements of each method as well as the quality and the quantity of the removed products. The tested methods were unidirectional flushing, Comprex®, and Ice Pigging®. The results of the comparison are expressed in terms of total suspended solids (TSS) recovery, metals mass concentration and water consumption. Since contamination can settle along the entire surface of the pipeline, it is most appropriate to recalculate the results per unit area of the pipeline. The results point at the following efficiency the Comprex® method was the most efficient in removing TSS, Ice Pigging® was the next and unidirectional flushing removed a negligible amount of TSS compared to the other two methods. The absolute recovery of TSS was 0.12-3.01 g·m-2 in unidirectional flushing of plastic pipes, 1.58-8.54 g·m-2 in unidirectional flushing of metal pipes, 4.36-47.53 g·m-2 in Ice Pigging®, and 5.19-69.23 g·m-2 in Comprex®. The composition of the sediment was strongly influenced by particle origin: Pipe material affected the crystalline phase of the sediment and the water source and the age of the pipe affected the amorphous phase of the sediment. Therefore, it was found that evaluation of efficiency based on the amount of TSS removed is only suitable for sites that meet the same conditions as pipe material, water source and ideally the pipe age. It has further been found that the Comprex® method can be advantageously used in real conditions to clean pipes with insufficient hydraulic conditions (such as with a high level of incrustation), as the cleaning has low water flow velocity requirements.
650    12
$a pitná voda $7 D060766
650    _2
$a kovy $7 D008670
650    _2
$a mikrobiologie vody $7 D014871
650    _2
$a zásobování vodou $7 D014881
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Heviánková, Silvie $u Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Mining and Geology, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00176090 $t International journal of environmental research and public health $x 1660-4601 $g Roč. 18, č. 8 (2021)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33921692 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210728 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210830100357 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1689790 $s 1139257
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 18 $c 8 $e 20210419 $i 1660-4601 $m International journal of environmental research and public health $n Int. j. environ. res. public health $x MED00176090
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210728

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...