Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Meniscus transplantation-prospective assessment of clinical results in two, five and ten year follow-up

L. Paša, J. Kužma, R. Herůfek, J. Prokeš, J. Jarkovský, V. Havlas

. 2021 ; 45 (4) : 941-957. [pub] 20200621

Language English Country Germany

Document type Journal Article

PURPOSE: The authors present clinical results in patients following transplantation of deep-frozen menisci within ten years following the surgery. METHODS: A cohort of 46 patients who were transplanted altogether 49 menisci was subject to prospective study following six months, two, five and ten years after meniscus transplantation. For subjective assessment, we used KOOS, IKDC and Lysholm scores; objective assessment was based on load X-ray examination of the operated knee at two, five and ten years after the surgery, MRI examination of 34 patients in the interval of two and ten years after the operation, control arthroscopy was performed in 23 patients eight of whom suffered a new injury. RESULTS: All 38 patients who have completed ten year follow-up without any new injury of the operated joint demonstrated statistically significant improvement of mobility in the period of six months and two, five and ten years following the meniscal transplantation. Further follow-up demonstrated different results in patients with a new injury and without a new injury of the operated knee joint. In eight patients (17.3%), the follow-up was disturbed by a new injury of the operated joint within three to eight years after the meniscal transplantation. In three patients with the damaged meniscal transplant, a cartilage deterioration from degree II to degree IIIa was found. In second-look arthroscopy, the patients with no injury showed signs of the improved condition of cartilage by one degree according to ICRS classification on average. The MRI imaging showed relatively frequent (47%) extrusion of the anterior and medial part of meniscus (2.5-3.8 mms) without the followed-up dynamics of changes at two and ten years after the surgery. CONCLUSION: All patients in the selected cohort proved the positive benefit of meniscus transplant when it comes to the improvement of clinical symptoms and improvement of mobility of the operated knee joint. The higher mobility following the transplantation compared to the activity prior to the surgery could have contributed to a new injury of the operated joint in 17% of the patients in the cohort.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21018920
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210830100508.0
007      
ta
008      
210728s2021 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00264-020-04638-2 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32564176
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Paša, Libor $u Department of Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. l.pasa@seznam.cz $u Trauma Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic. l.pasa@seznam.cz
245    10
$a Meniscus transplantation-prospective assessment of clinical results in two, five and ten year follow-up / $c L. Paša, J. Kužma, R. Herůfek, J. Prokeš, J. Jarkovský, V. Havlas
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: The authors present clinical results in patients following transplantation of deep-frozen menisci within ten years following the surgery. METHODS: A cohort of 46 patients who were transplanted altogether 49 menisci was subject to prospective study following six months, two, five and ten years after meniscus transplantation. For subjective assessment, we used KOOS, IKDC and Lysholm scores; objective assessment was based on load X-ray examination of the operated knee at two, five and ten years after the surgery, MRI examination of 34 patients in the interval of two and ten years after the operation, control arthroscopy was performed in 23 patients eight of whom suffered a new injury. RESULTS: All 38 patients who have completed ten year follow-up without any new injury of the operated joint demonstrated statistically significant improvement of mobility in the period of six months and two, five and ten years following the meniscal transplantation. Further follow-up demonstrated different results in patients with a new injury and without a new injury of the operated knee joint. In eight patients (17.3%), the follow-up was disturbed by a new injury of the operated joint within three to eight years after the meniscal transplantation. In three patients with the damaged meniscal transplant, a cartilage deterioration from degree II to degree IIIa was found. In second-look arthroscopy, the patients with no injury showed signs of the improved condition of cartilage by one degree according to ICRS classification on average. The MRI imaging showed relatively frequent (47%) extrusion of the anterior and medial part of meniscus (2.5-3.8 mms) without the followed-up dynamics of changes at two and ten years after the surgery. CONCLUSION: All patients in the selected cohort proved the positive benefit of meniscus transplant when it comes to the improvement of clinical symptoms and improvement of mobility of the operated knee joint. The higher mobility following the transplantation compared to the activity prior to the surgery could have contributed to a new injury of the operated joint in 17% of the patients in the cohort.
650    _2
$a artroskopie $7 D001182
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a kolenní kloub $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $7 D007719
650    _2
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $7 D008279
650    _2
$a menisky tibiální $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $7 D008592
650    12
$a meniskus $x diagnostické zobrazování $x chirurgie $7 D000072600
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    12
$a poranění menisku $x diagnostické zobrazování $x epidemiologie $x chirurgie $7 D000070600
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Kužma, Ján $u Department of Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u Trauma Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Herůfek, Radim $u Department of Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u Trauma Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Prokeš, Josef $u Department of Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u Trauma Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Jarkovský, Jiří $u Institute of Biostatics and Analysis, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Havlas, Vojtěch $u Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00002384 $t International orthopaedics $x 1432-5195 $g Roč. 45, č. 4 (2021), s. 941-957
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32564176 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210728 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210830100508 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1689877 $s 1139366
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 45 $c 4 $d 941-957 $e 20200621 $i 1432-5195 $m International orthopaedics $n Int Orthop $x MED00002384
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210728

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...