• Something wrong with this record ?

Effects of motion correction, sampling rate and parametric modelling in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the temporomandibular joint in children affected with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

L. Starck, E. Andersen, O. Macíček, O. Angenete, TA. Augdal, K. Rosendahl, R. Jiřík, R. Grüner

. 2021 ; 77 (-) : 204-212. [pub] 20210113

Language English Country Netherlands

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is typically involved in 45-87% of children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA). Accurate diagnosis of JIA is difficult as various clinical tests, including MRI, disagree. The purpose of this study is to optimize the methodological aspects of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE) MRI of the TMJ in children. In this cross-sectional study, including data from 73 JIA affected children, aged 6-15 years, effects of motion correction, sampling rate and parametric modelling on DCE-MRI data is investigated. Consensus among three radiologists determined the regions of interest. Quantitative perfusion parameters were estimated using four perfusion models; the Adiabatic Approximation to Tissue Homogeneity (AATH), Distributed Capillary Adiabatic Tissue Homogeneity (DCATH), Gamma Capillary Transit Time (GCTT) and Two Compartment Exchange (2CXM) models. Effects of motion correction were evaluated by a sum of least squares between corrected raw data and the GCTT model. The effect of systematically down sampling the raw data was tested. The sum of least squares was computed across all pharmacokinetic models. Relative difference perfusion parameters between the left and right TMJ were used for an unsupervised k-means based stratification of the data based on a principal component analysis, as well as for a supervised random forest classification. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were computed relative to structural image scorings. Paired sample t-tests, as well as ANOVA tests, were used (significant threshold: p < 0.05) with Tukeys post hoc test. High-level elastic motion correction provides the best least square fit to the GCTT model (percental improvement: 72-84%). A 4 s sampling rate captures more of the potentially disease relevant signal variations. The various parametric models all leave comparable residues (relative standard deviation: 3.4%). In further evaluation of DCE-MRI as a potential diagnostic tool for JIA a high-level elastic motion correction scheme should be adopted, with a sampling rate of at least 4 s. Results suggest that DCE-MRI data can be a valuable part in JIA diagnostics in the TMJ.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21018940
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210830100521.0
007      
ta
008      
210728s2021 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.mri.2020.12.014 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33359424
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Starck, Lea $u Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. Electronic address: lea.starck@uib.no
245    10
$a Effects of motion correction, sampling rate and parametric modelling in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the temporomandibular joint in children affected with juvenile idiopathic arthritis / $c L. Starck, E. Andersen, O. Macíček, O. Angenete, TA. Augdal, K. Rosendahl, R. Jiřík, R. Grüner
520    9_
$a The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is typically involved in 45-87% of children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA). Accurate diagnosis of JIA is difficult as various clinical tests, including MRI, disagree. The purpose of this study is to optimize the methodological aspects of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE) MRI of the TMJ in children. In this cross-sectional study, including data from 73 JIA affected children, aged 6-15 years, effects of motion correction, sampling rate and parametric modelling on DCE-MRI data is investigated. Consensus among three radiologists determined the regions of interest. Quantitative perfusion parameters were estimated using four perfusion models; the Adiabatic Approximation to Tissue Homogeneity (AATH), Distributed Capillary Adiabatic Tissue Homogeneity (DCATH), Gamma Capillary Transit Time (GCTT) and Two Compartment Exchange (2CXM) models. Effects of motion correction were evaluated by a sum of least squares between corrected raw data and the GCTT model. The effect of systematically down sampling the raw data was tested. The sum of least squares was computed across all pharmacokinetic models. Relative difference perfusion parameters between the left and right TMJ were used for an unsupervised k-means based stratification of the data based on a principal component analysis, as well as for a supervised random forest classification. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were computed relative to structural image scorings. Paired sample t-tests, as well as ANOVA tests, were used (significant threshold: p < 0.05) with Tukeys post hoc test. High-level elastic motion correction provides the best least square fit to the GCTT model (percental improvement: 72-84%). A 4 s sampling rate captures more of the potentially disease relevant signal variations. The various parametric models all leave comparable residues (relative standard deviation: 3.4%). In further evaluation of DCE-MRI as a potential diagnostic tool for JIA a high-level elastic motion correction scheme should be adopted, with a sampling rate of at least 4 s. Results suggest that DCE-MRI data can be a valuable part in JIA diagnostics in the TMJ.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a juvenilní artritida $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D001171
650    _2
$a artefakty $7 D016477
650    _2
$a dítě $7 D002648
650    _2
$a předškolní dítě $7 D002675
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a počítačové zpracování obrazu $7 D007091
650    12
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $7 D008279
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    12
$a statistické modely $7 D015233
650    12
$a pohyb $7 D009068
650    _2
$a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
650    _2
$a temporomandibulární kloub $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D013704
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Andersen, Erling $u Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Engineering, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. Electronic address: erling.andersen@helse-bergen.no
700    1_
$a Macíček, Ondřej $u Institute of Scientific Instruments of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czechia. Electronic address: macicek@isibrno.cz
700    1_
$a Angenete, Oskar $u Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Olav Hospital HF, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway. Electronic address: Oskar.Angenete@stolav.no
700    1_
$a Augdal, Thomas A $u Section for Paediatric Radiology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway; Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Norway. Electronic address: Thomas.Angell.Augdal@unn.no
700    1_
$a Rosendahl, Karen $u Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Norway. Electronic address: Karen.Rosendahl@unn.no
700    1_
$a Jiřík, Radovan $u Institute of Scientific Instruments of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czechia. Electronic address: jirik@isibrno.cz
700    1_
$a Grüner, Renate $u Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway. Electronic address: eli.renate.gruner@helse-bergen.no
773    0_
$w MED00003171 $t Magnetic resonance imaging $x 1873-5894 $g Roč. 77, č. - (2021), s. 204-212
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33359424 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210728 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210830100521 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1689894 $s 1139386
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 77 $c - $d 204-212 $e 20210113 $i 1873-5894 $m Magnetic resonance imaging $n Magn Reson Imaging $x MED00003171
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210728

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...