Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Predicting spread and effective control measures for African swine fever-Should we blame the boars

RA. Taylor, T. Podgórski, RRL. Simons, S. Ip, P. Gale, LA. Kelly, EL. Snary

. 2021 ; 68 (2) : 397-416. [pub] 20200806

Language English Country Germany

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
643476 Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
2014/15/B/NZ9/01933 Narodowe Centrum Nauki

An ongoing, continually spreading, outbreak of African swine fever (ASF), following its identification in Georgia in 2007, has resulted in 17 European and 12 Asian countries reporting cases by April 2020, with cases occurring in both wild boar and domestic pigs. Curtailing further spread of ASF requires understanding of the transmission pathways of the disease. ASF is self-sustaining in the wild boar population, and they have been implicated as one of the main drivers of transmission within Europe. We developed a spatially explicit model to estimate the risk of infection with ASF in wild boar and pigs due to natural movement of wild boar that is applicable across the whole of Europe. We demonstrate the model by using it to predict the probability that early cases of ASF in Poland were caused by wild boar dispersion. The risk of infection in 2015 is computed due to wild boar cases in Poland in 2014, compared against reported cases in 2015, and then the procedure is repeated for 2015-2016. We find that long- and medium-distance spread of ASF (i.e. >30 km) is unlikely to have occurred due to wild boar dispersal, due in part to the generally short distances wild boar will travel (<20 km on average). We also predict the relative success of different control strategies in 2015, if they were implemented in 2014. Results suggest that hunting of wild boar reduces the number of new cases, but a larger region is at risk of ASF compared with no control measure. Alternatively, introducing wild boar-proof fencing reduces the size of the region at risk in 2015, but not the total number of cases. Overall, our model suggests wild boar movement is only responsible for local transmission of disease; thus, other pathways are more dominant in medium- and long-distance spread of the disease.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21019184
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210830100743.0
007      
ta
008      
210728s2021 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/tbed.13690 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32564507
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Taylor, Rachel A $u Department of Epidemiological Sciences, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, UK
245    10
$a Predicting spread and effective control measures for African swine fever-Should we blame the boars / $c RA. Taylor, T. Podgórski, RRL. Simons, S. Ip, P. Gale, LA. Kelly, EL. Snary
520    9_
$a An ongoing, continually spreading, outbreak of African swine fever (ASF), following its identification in Georgia in 2007, has resulted in 17 European and 12 Asian countries reporting cases by April 2020, with cases occurring in both wild boar and domestic pigs. Curtailing further spread of ASF requires understanding of the transmission pathways of the disease. ASF is self-sustaining in the wild boar population, and they have been implicated as one of the main drivers of transmission within Europe. We developed a spatially explicit model to estimate the risk of infection with ASF in wild boar and pigs due to natural movement of wild boar that is applicable across the whole of Europe. We demonstrate the model by using it to predict the probability that early cases of ASF in Poland were caused by wild boar dispersion. The risk of infection in 2015 is computed due to wild boar cases in Poland in 2014, compared against reported cases in 2015, and then the procedure is repeated for 2015-2016. We find that long- and medium-distance spread of ASF (i.e. >30 km) is unlikely to have occurred due to wild boar dispersal, due in part to the generally short distances wild boar will travel (<20 km on average). We also predict the relative success of different control strategies in 2015, if they were implemented in 2014. Results suggest that hunting of wild boar reduces the number of new cases, but a larger region is at risk of ASF compared with no control measure. Alternatively, introducing wild boar-proof fencing reduces the size of the region at risk in 2015, but not the total number of cases. Overall, our model suggests wild boar movement is only responsible for local transmission of disease; thus, other pathways are more dominant in medium- and long-distance spread of the disease.
650    _2
$a africký mor prasat $x epidemiologie $x prevence a kontrola $x přenos $7 D000357
650    _2
$a virus afrického moru prasat $7 D000358
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    12
$a divoká zvířata $7 D000835
650    _2
$a chování zvířat $7 D001522
650    _2
$a epidemický výskyt choroby $x veterinární $7 D004196
650    _2
$a pravděpodobnost $7 D011336
650    12
$a Sus scrofa $7 D034421
650    _2
$a prasata $7 D013552
651    _2
$a Asie $x epidemiologie $7 D001208
651    _2
$a Evropa $x epidemiologie $7 D005060
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Podgórski, Tomasz $u Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Białowieża, Poland $u Department of Game Management and Wildlife Biology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Praha, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Simons, Robin R L $u Department of Epidemiological Sciences, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, UK
700    1_
$a Ip, Sophie $u Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
700    1_
$a Gale, Paul $u Department of Epidemiological Sciences, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, UK
700    1_
$a Kelly, Louise A $u Department of Epidemiological Sciences, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, UK $u Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
700    1_
$a Snary, Emma L $u Department of Epidemiological Sciences, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Addlestone, UK
773    0_
$w MED00169643 $t Transboundary and emerging diseases $x 1865-1682 $g Roč. 68, č. 2 (2021), s. 397-416
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32564507 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210728 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210830100743 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1690091 $s 1139630
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 68 $c 2 $d 397-416 $e 20200806 $i 1865-1682 $m Transboundary and emerging diseases $n Transbound Emerg Dis $x MED00169643
GRA    __
$a 643476 $p Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
GRA    __
$a 2014/15/B/NZ9/01933 $p Narodowe Centrum Nauki
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210728

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...