-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Switching first-line targeted therapy after not reaching low disease activity within 6 months is superior to conservative approach: a propensity score-matched analysis from the ATTRA registry
L. Nekvindová, J. Vencovský, K. Pavelka, P. Horák, Z. Křístková, J. Závada
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
BioMedCentral
od 2003
BioMedCentral Open Access
od 2003
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 1999
Free Medical Journals
od 2003 do Před 6 měsíci
PubMed Central
od 2003
Europe PubMed Central
od 2003
ProQuest Central
od 2015-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 1999-10-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 1999-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 1999-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2003-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2011-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2015-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2003
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
od 1999-06-01
- MeSH
- antirevmatika * terapeutické užití MeSH
- indukce remise MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- registrace MeSH
- stupeň závažnosti nemoci MeSH
- tendenční skóre MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
BACKGROUND: Treat-to-target (T2T) is a widely accepted strategy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It recommends attaining a goal of at least low disease activity (LDA) within 6 months; otherwise, the current therapy should be modified. We aimed to investigate whether switching a first-line targeted therapy (TT) in patients not reaching LDA within 6 months leads to a higher probability of meeting LDA at the 12-month visit in daily clinical practice using data from Czech registry ATTRA. METHODS: We included patients with RA starting the first-line TT from 1 January 2012 to 31 January 2017 with at least 1-year follow-up. We created four mutually exclusive cohorts based on (1) switching to another TT within the first year and (2) reaching a treatment target (DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2) at the 6-month visit. The primary outcome was the comparison of odds for reaching remission (REM) or LDA at the 12-month visit between patients switching and not switching TT after not reaching treatment target at 6 months. Before using logistic regression to estimate the odds ratio, we employed the propensity score to match patients at the 6-month visit. RESULTS: A total of 1275 patients were eligible for the analysis. Sixty-two patients switched within the first 5 months of the treatment before evaluating treatment response at the 6-month visit (C1); 598 patients reached the treatment target within 6 months of therapy (C2); 124 patients did not reach treatment response at 6-month visit and switched to another therapy (C3), and 491 patients continued with the same treatment despite not reaching LDA at the 6-month visit (C4). We matched 75 patients from cohort C3 and 75 patients from C4 using the propensity score. Patients following the T2T principle (C3) showed 2.8 (95% CI 1.4-5.8; p = 0.005) times increased likelihood of achieving REM/LDA at the 12-month visit compared to patients not following the T2T strategy (C4). CONCLUSIONS: In daily clinical practice, the application of the T2T strategy is underused. Switching TT after not reaching REM/LDA within the first 6 months leads to a higher probability of achieving REM/LDA in RA patients at the 12-month visit.
Department of Rheumatology 1st Faculty of Medicine Prague Czech Republic
Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses Ltd Brno Czech Republic
Institute of Rheumatology Na Slupi 4 128 00 Prague Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21019473
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210830101037.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210728s2021 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s13075-020-02393-8 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33407803
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Nekvindová, Lucie $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Ltd., Brno, Czech Republic $u Institute of Rheumatology, Na Slupi 4, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Switching first-line targeted therapy after not reaching low disease activity within 6 months is superior to conservative approach: a propensity score-matched analysis from the ATTRA registry / $c L. Nekvindová, J. Vencovský, K. Pavelka, P. Horák, Z. Křístková, J. Závada
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Treat-to-target (T2T) is a widely accepted strategy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It recommends attaining a goal of at least low disease activity (LDA) within 6 months; otherwise, the current therapy should be modified. We aimed to investigate whether switching a first-line targeted therapy (TT) in patients not reaching LDA within 6 months leads to a higher probability of meeting LDA at the 12-month visit in daily clinical practice using data from Czech registry ATTRA. METHODS: We included patients with RA starting the first-line TT from 1 January 2012 to 31 January 2017 with at least 1-year follow-up. We created four mutually exclusive cohorts based on (1) switching to another TT within the first year and (2) reaching a treatment target (DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2) at the 6-month visit. The primary outcome was the comparison of odds for reaching remission (REM) or LDA at the 12-month visit between patients switching and not switching TT after not reaching treatment target at 6 months. Before using logistic regression to estimate the odds ratio, we employed the propensity score to match patients at the 6-month visit. RESULTS: A total of 1275 patients were eligible for the analysis. Sixty-two patients switched within the first 5 months of the treatment before evaluating treatment response at the 6-month visit (C1); 598 patients reached the treatment target within 6 months of therapy (C2); 124 patients did not reach treatment response at 6-month visit and switched to another therapy (C3), and 491 patients continued with the same treatment despite not reaching LDA at the 6-month visit (C4). We matched 75 patients from cohort C3 and 75 patients from C4 using the propensity score. Patients following the T2T principle (C3) showed 2.8 (95% CI 1.4-5.8; p = 0.005) times increased likelihood of achieving REM/LDA at the 12-month visit compared to patients not following the T2T strategy (C4). CONCLUSIONS: In daily clinical practice, the application of the T2T strategy is underused. Switching TT after not reaching REM/LDA within the first 6 months leads to a higher probability of achieving REM/LDA in RA patients at the 12-month visit.
- 650 12
- $a antirevmatika $x terapeutické užití $7 D018501
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a tendenční skóre $7 D057216
- 650 _2
- $a registrace $7 D012042
- 650 _2
- $a indukce remise $7 D012074
- 650 _2
- $a stupeň závažnosti nemoci $7 D012720
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Vencovský, Jiří $u Institute of Rheumatology, Na Slupi 4, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Rheumatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Pavelka, Karel $u Institute of Rheumatology, Na Slupi 4, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Rheumatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Horák, Pavel $u Department of Internal Medicine III - Nephrology, Rheumatology, Endocrinology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic $u University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Křístková, Zlatuše $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Ltd., Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Závada, Jakub $u Institute of Rheumatology, Na Slupi 4, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic. zavada@revma.cz $u Department of Rheumatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic. zavada@revma.cz
- 773 0_
- $w MED00007534 $t Arthritis research & therapy $x 1478-6362 $g Roč. 23, č. 1 (2021), s. 11
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33407803 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210728 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210830101037 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1690321 $s 1139919
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 23 $c 1 $d 11 $e 20210106 $i 1478-6362 $m Arthritis research & therapy $n Arthritis Res Ther $x MED00007534
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210728