-
Something wrong with this record ?
Switching first-line targeted therapy after not reaching low disease activity within 6 months is superior to conservative approach: a propensity score-matched analysis from the ATTRA registry
L. Nekvindová, J. Vencovský, K. Pavelka, P. Horák, Z. Křístková, J. Závada
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
BioMedCentral
from 2003
BioMedCentral Open Access
from 2003
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 1999
Free Medical Journals
from 2003 to 6 months ago
PubMed Central
from 2003
Europe PubMed Central
from 2003
ProQuest Central
from 2015-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 1999-10-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 1999-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 1999-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2003-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2011-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2015-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2003
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
from 1999-06-01
- MeSH
- Antirheumatic Agents * therapeutic use MeSH
- Remission Induction MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Registries MeSH
- Severity of Illness Index MeSH
- Propensity Score MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
BACKGROUND: Treat-to-target (T2T) is a widely accepted strategy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It recommends attaining a goal of at least low disease activity (LDA) within 6 months; otherwise, the current therapy should be modified. We aimed to investigate whether switching a first-line targeted therapy (TT) in patients not reaching LDA within 6 months leads to a higher probability of meeting LDA at the 12-month visit in daily clinical practice using data from Czech registry ATTRA. METHODS: We included patients with RA starting the first-line TT from 1 January 2012 to 31 January 2017 with at least 1-year follow-up. We created four mutually exclusive cohorts based on (1) switching to another TT within the first year and (2) reaching a treatment target (DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2) at the 6-month visit. The primary outcome was the comparison of odds for reaching remission (REM) or LDA at the 12-month visit between patients switching and not switching TT after not reaching treatment target at 6 months. Before using logistic regression to estimate the odds ratio, we employed the propensity score to match patients at the 6-month visit. RESULTS: A total of 1275 patients were eligible for the analysis. Sixty-two patients switched within the first 5 months of the treatment before evaluating treatment response at the 6-month visit (C1); 598 patients reached the treatment target within 6 months of therapy (C2); 124 patients did not reach treatment response at 6-month visit and switched to another therapy (C3), and 491 patients continued with the same treatment despite not reaching LDA at the 6-month visit (C4). We matched 75 patients from cohort C3 and 75 patients from C4 using the propensity score. Patients following the T2T principle (C3) showed 2.8 (95% CI 1.4-5.8; p = 0.005) times increased likelihood of achieving REM/LDA at the 12-month visit compared to patients not following the T2T strategy (C4). CONCLUSIONS: In daily clinical practice, the application of the T2T strategy is underused. Switching TT after not reaching REM/LDA within the first 6 months leads to a higher probability of achieving REM/LDA in RA patients at the 12-month visit.
Department of Rheumatology 1st Faculty of Medicine Prague Czech Republic
Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses Ltd Brno Czech Republic
Institute of Rheumatology Na Slupi 4 128 00 Prague Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21019473
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210830101037.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210728s2021 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s13075-020-02393-8 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33407803
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Nekvindová, Lucie $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Ltd., Brno, Czech Republic $u Institute of Rheumatology, Na Slupi 4, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Switching first-line targeted therapy after not reaching low disease activity within 6 months is superior to conservative approach: a propensity score-matched analysis from the ATTRA registry / $c L. Nekvindová, J. Vencovský, K. Pavelka, P. Horák, Z. Křístková, J. Závada
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Treat-to-target (T2T) is a widely accepted strategy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It recommends attaining a goal of at least low disease activity (LDA) within 6 months; otherwise, the current therapy should be modified. We aimed to investigate whether switching a first-line targeted therapy (TT) in patients not reaching LDA within 6 months leads to a higher probability of meeting LDA at the 12-month visit in daily clinical practice using data from Czech registry ATTRA. METHODS: We included patients with RA starting the first-line TT from 1 January 2012 to 31 January 2017 with at least 1-year follow-up. We created four mutually exclusive cohorts based on (1) switching to another TT within the first year and (2) reaching a treatment target (DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2) at the 6-month visit. The primary outcome was the comparison of odds for reaching remission (REM) or LDA at the 12-month visit between patients switching and not switching TT after not reaching treatment target at 6 months. Before using logistic regression to estimate the odds ratio, we employed the propensity score to match patients at the 6-month visit. RESULTS: A total of 1275 patients were eligible for the analysis. Sixty-two patients switched within the first 5 months of the treatment before evaluating treatment response at the 6-month visit (C1); 598 patients reached the treatment target within 6 months of therapy (C2); 124 patients did not reach treatment response at 6-month visit and switched to another therapy (C3), and 491 patients continued with the same treatment despite not reaching LDA at the 6-month visit (C4). We matched 75 patients from cohort C3 and 75 patients from C4 using the propensity score. Patients following the T2T principle (C3) showed 2.8 (95% CI 1.4-5.8; p = 0.005) times increased likelihood of achieving REM/LDA at the 12-month visit compared to patients not following the T2T strategy (C4). CONCLUSIONS: In daily clinical practice, the application of the T2T strategy is underused. Switching TT after not reaching REM/LDA within the first 6 months leads to a higher probability of achieving REM/LDA in RA patients at the 12-month visit.
- 650 12
- $a antirevmatika $x terapeutické užití $7 D018501
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a tendenční skóre $7 D057216
- 650 _2
- $a registrace $7 D012042
- 650 _2
- $a indukce remise $7 D012074
- 650 _2
- $a stupeň závažnosti nemoci $7 D012720
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Vencovský, Jiří $u Institute of Rheumatology, Na Slupi 4, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Rheumatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Pavelka, Karel $u Institute of Rheumatology, Na Slupi 4, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Rheumatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Horák, Pavel $u Department of Internal Medicine III - Nephrology, Rheumatology, Endocrinology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic $u University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Křístková, Zlatuše $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Ltd., Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Závada, Jakub $u Institute of Rheumatology, Na Slupi 4, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic. zavada@revma.cz $u Department of Rheumatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic. zavada@revma.cz
- 773 0_
- $w MED00007534 $t Arthritis research & therapy $x 1478-6362 $g Roč. 23, č. 1 (2021), s. 11
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33407803 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210728 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210830101037 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1690321 $s 1139919
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 23 $c 1 $d 11 $e 20210106 $i 1478-6362 $m Arthritis research & therapy $n Arthritis Res Ther $x MED00007534
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210728