• Something wrong with this record ?

Switching first-line targeted therapy after not reaching low disease activity within 6 months is superior to conservative approach: a propensity score-matched analysis from the ATTRA registry

L. Nekvindová, J. Vencovský, K. Pavelka, P. Horák, Z. Křístková, J. Závada

. 2021 ; 23 (1) : 11. [pub] 20210106

Language English Country Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

BACKGROUND: Treat-to-target (T2T) is a widely accepted strategy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It recommends attaining a goal of at least low disease activity (LDA) within 6 months; otherwise, the current therapy should be modified. We aimed to investigate whether switching a first-line targeted therapy (TT) in patients not reaching LDA within 6 months leads to a higher probability of meeting LDA at the 12-month visit in daily clinical practice using data from Czech registry ATTRA. METHODS: We included patients with RA starting the first-line TT from 1 January 2012 to 31 January 2017 with at least 1-year follow-up. We created four mutually exclusive cohorts based on (1) switching to another TT within the first year and (2) reaching a treatment target (DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2) at the 6-month visit. The primary outcome was the comparison of odds for reaching remission (REM) or LDA at the 12-month visit between patients switching and not switching TT after not reaching treatment target at 6 months. Before using logistic regression to estimate the odds ratio, we employed the propensity score to match patients at the 6-month visit. RESULTS: A total of 1275 patients were eligible for the analysis. Sixty-two patients switched within the first 5 months of the treatment before evaluating treatment response at the 6-month visit (C1); 598 patients reached the treatment target within 6 months of therapy (C2); 124 patients did not reach treatment response at 6-month visit and switched to another therapy (C3), and 491 patients continued with the same treatment despite not reaching LDA at the 6-month visit (C4). We matched 75 patients from cohort C3 and 75 patients from C4 using the propensity score. Patients following the T2T principle (C3) showed 2.8 (95% CI 1.4-5.8; p = 0.005) times increased likelihood of achieving REM/LDA at the 12-month visit compared to patients not following the T2T strategy (C4). CONCLUSIONS: In daily clinical practice, the application of the T2T strategy is underused. Switching TT after not reaching REM/LDA within the first 6 months leads to a higher probability of achieving REM/LDA in RA patients at the 12-month visit.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21019473
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210830101037.0
007      
ta
008      
210728s2021 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s13075-020-02393-8 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33407803
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Nekvindová, Lucie $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Ltd., Brno, Czech Republic $u Institute of Rheumatology, Na Slupi 4, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Switching first-line targeted therapy after not reaching low disease activity within 6 months is superior to conservative approach: a propensity score-matched analysis from the ATTRA registry / $c L. Nekvindová, J. Vencovský, K. Pavelka, P. Horák, Z. Křístková, J. Závada
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Treat-to-target (T2T) is a widely accepted strategy for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It recommends attaining a goal of at least low disease activity (LDA) within 6 months; otherwise, the current therapy should be modified. We aimed to investigate whether switching a first-line targeted therapy (TT) in patients not reaching LDA within 6 months leads to a higher probability of meeting LDA at the 12-month visit in daily clinical practice using data from Czech registry ATTRA. METHODS: We included patients with RA starting the first-line TT from 1 January 2012 to 31 January 2017 with at least 1-year follow-up. We created four mutually exclusive cohorts based on (1) switching to another TT within the first year and (2) reaching a treatment target (DAS28-ESR ≤ 3.2) at the 6-month visit. The primary outcome was the comparison of odds for reaching remission (REM) or LDA at the 12-month visit between patients switching and not switching TT after not reaching treatment target at 6 months. Before using logistic regression to estimate the odds ratio, we employed the propensity score to match patients at the 6-month visit. RESULTS: A total of 1275 patients were eligible for the analysis. Sixty-two patients switched within the first 5 months of the treatment before evaluating treatment response at the 6-month visit (C1); 598 patients reached the treatment target within 6 months of therapy (C2); 124 patients did not reach treatment response at 6-month visit and switched to another therapy (C3), and 491 patients continued with the same treatment despite not reaching LDA at the 6-month visit (C4). We matched 75 patients from cohort C3 and 75 patients from C4 using the propensity score. Patients following the T2T principle (C3) showed 2.8 (95% CI 1.4-5.8; p = 0.005) times increased likelihood of achieving REM/LDA at the 12-month visit compared to patients not following the T2T strategy (C4). CONCLUSIONS: In daily clinical practice, the application of the T2T strategy is underused. Switching TT after not reaching REM/LDA within the first 6 months leads to a higher probability of achieving REM/LDA in RA patients at the 12-month visit.
650    12
$a antirevmatika $x terapeutické užití $7 D018501
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a tendenční skóre $7 D057216
650    _2
$a registrace $7 D012042
650    _2
$a indukce remise $7 D012074
650    _2
$a stupeň závažnosti nemoci $7 D012720
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Vencovský, Jiří $u Institute of Rheumatology, Na Slupi 4, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Rheumatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Pavelka, Karel $u Institute of Rheumatology, Na Slupi 4, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Rheumatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Horák, Pavel $u Department of Internal Medicine III - Nephrology, Rheumatology, Endocrinology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic $u University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Křístková, Zlatuše $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Ltd., Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Závada, Jakub $u Institute of Rheumatology, Na Slupi 4, 128 00, Prague, Czech Republic. zavada@revma.cz $u Department of Rheumatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic. zavada@revma.cz
773    0_
$w MED00007534 $t Arthritis research & therapy $x 1478-6362 $g Roč. 23, č. 1 (2021), s. 11
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33407803 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210728 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210830101037 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1690321 $s 1139919
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 23 $c 1 $d 11 $e 20210106 $i 1478-6362 $m Arthritis research & therapy $n Arthritis Res Ther $x MED00007534
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210728

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...