-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Organization of intensive cardiac care units in Europe: Results of a multinational survey
MJ. Claeys, F. Roubille, G. Casella, R. Zukermann, N. Nikolaou, L. De Luca, M. Gierlotka, Z. Iakobishvili, H. Thiele, M. Koutouzis, A. Sionis, S. Monteiro, C. Beauloye, C. Held, D. Tint, I. Zakke, P. Serpytis, Z. Babic, J. Belohlavev, A. Magdy,...
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie
PubMed
31976740
DOI
10.1177/2048872619883997
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- jednotky intenzivní péče organizace a řízení MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- morbidita trendy MeSH
- nemoci srdce epidemiologie terapie MeSH
- příjem pacientů statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
BACKGROUND: The present survey aims to describe the intensive cardiac care unit organization and admission policies in Europe. METHODS: A total of 228 hospitals (61% academic) from 27 countries participated in this survey. In addition to the organizational aspects of the intensive cardiac care units, including classification of the intensive cardiac care unit levels, data on the admission diagnoses were gathered from consecutive patients who were admitted during a two-day period. Admission policies were evaluated by comparing illness severity with the intensive cardiac care unit level. Gross national income was used to differentiate high-income countries (n=13) from middle-income countries (n=14). RESULTS: A total of 98% of the hospitals had an intensive cardiac care unit: 70% had a level 1 intensive cardiac care unit, 76% had a level 2 intensive cardiac care unit, 51% had a level 3 intensive cardiac care unit, and 60% of the hospitals had more than one intensive cardiac care unit level. High-income countries tended to have more level 3 intensive cardiac care units than middle-income countries (55% versus 41%, p=0.07). A total of 5159 admissions were scored on illness severity: 63% were low severity, 24% were intermediate severity, and 12% were high severity. Patients with low illness severity were predominantly admitted to level 1 intensive cardiac care units, whereas patients with high illness severity were predominantly admitted to level 2 and 3 intensive cardiac care units. A policy mismatch was observed in 12% of the patients; some patients with high illness severity were admitted to level 1 intensive cardiac care units, which occurred more often in middle-income countries, whereas some patients with low illness severity were admitted to level 3 intensive cardiac care units, which occurred more frequently in high-income countries. CONCLUSION: More than one-third of the admitted patients were considered intermediate or high risk. Although patients with higher illness severity were mostly admitted to high-level intensive cardiac care units, an admission policy mismatch was observed in 12% of the patients; this mismatch was partly related to insufficient logistic intensive cardiac care unit capacity.
2nd Department of Medicine Charles University Czech Republic
Adult Intensive Care Unit Royal Brompton Hospital London
Clinical Center of Serbia Emergency Center Serbia
Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc UCLouvain Belgium
Coimbra University Hospital Portugal
Department of Cardiology Aarhus University Hospital Denmark
Department of Cardiology Antwerp University Hospital Belgium
Department of Cardiology Konstantopouleio General Hospital Greece
Department of Cardiology Ospedale Maggiore Italy
Department of Cardiology Rigshospitalet Denmark
Department of Cardiology S Giovanni Evangelista Hospital Italy
Department of Cardiology University Hospital of Montpellier France
Department of Cardiology University of Opole Poland
Department of Cardiology University of Tartu Estonia
Department of Clinical Medicine University of Copenhagen Denmark
Department of Medical Sciences Uppsala Clinical Research Center Sweden
Division of Cardiology San Gerardo Hospital Italy
Faculty of Medicine Vilnius University Lithuania
Heart Center Leipzig University Hospital Germany
Heart Institute Holon Medical Center Israel
Hôpital Cantonal Fribourg Switzerland
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Spain
ICCO Clinics Transilvania University Romania
ICCU National Cardiology Hospital Bulgaria
Intensive Cardiac Care Unit Hospices Civils de Lyon France
National Heart Institution Egypt
North Estonia Medical Centre Estonia
Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital Latvia
PHO University Clinic of Cardiology Macedonia
Rambam Medical Health Center Israel
Red Cross General Hospital Greece
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21019711
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210830101307.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210728s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1177/2048872619883997 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31976740
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Claeys, M J $u Department of Cardiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium
- 245 10
- $a Organization of intensive cardiac care units in Europe: Results of a multinational survey / $c MJ. Claeys, F. Roubille, G. Casella, R. Zukermann, N. Nikolaou, L. De Luca, M. Gierlotka, Z. Iakobishvili, H. Thiele, M. Koutouzis, A. Sionis, S. Monteiro, C. Beauloye, C. Held, D. Tint, I. Zakke, P. Serpytis, Z. Babic, J. Belohlavev, A. Magdy, M. Sivagowry Rasalingam, K. Daly, D. Arroyo, M. Vavlukis, N. Radovanovic, E. Trendafilova, T. Marandi, C. Hassenger, M. Lettino, S. Price, E. Bonnefoy
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The present survey aims to describe the intensive cardiac care unit organization and admission policies in Europe. METHODS: A total of 228 hospitals (61% academic) from 27 countries participated in this survey. In addition to the organizational aspects of the intensive cardiac care units, including classification of the intensive cardiac care unit levels, data on the admission diagnoses were gathered from consecutive patients who were admitted during a two-day period. Admission policies were evaluated by comparing illness severity with the intensive cardiac care unit level. Gross national income was used to differentiate high-income countries (n=13) from middle-income countries (n=14). RESULTS: A total of 98% of the hospitals had an intensive cardiac care unit: 70% had a level 1 intensive cardiac care unit, 76% had a level 2 intensive cardiac care unit, 51% had a level 3 intensive cardiac care unit, and 60% of the hospitals had more than one intensive cardiac care unit level. High-income countries tended to have more level 3 intensive cardiac care units than middle-income countries (55% versus 41%, p=0.07). A total of 5159 admissions were scored on illness severity: 63% were low severity, 24% were intermediate severity, and 12% were high severity. Patients with low illness severity were predominantly admitted to level 1 intensive cardiac care units, whereas patients with high illness severity were predominantly admitted to level 2 and 3 intensive cardiac care units. A policy mismatch was observed in 12% of the patients; some patients with high illness severity were admitted to level 1 intensive cardiac care units, which occurred more often in middle-income countries, whereas some patients with low illness severity were admitted to level 3 intensive cardiac care units, which occurred more frequently in high-income countries. CONCLUSION: More than one-third of the admitted patients were considered intermediate or high risk. Although patients with higher illness severity were mostly admitted to high-level intensive cardiac care units, an admission policy mismatch was observed in 12% of the patients; this mismatch was partly related to insufficient logistic intensive cardiac care unit capacity.
- 650 _2
- $a nemoci srdce $x epidemiologie $x terapie $7 D006331
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a jednotky intenzivní péče $x organizace a řízení $7 D007362
- 650 _2
- $a morbidita $x trendy $7 D009017
- 650 _2
- $a příjem pacientů $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D010343
- 650 _2
- $a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
- 650 _2
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
- 651 _2
- $a Evropa $x epidemiologie $7 D005060
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 700 1_
- $a Roubille, F $u Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Montpellier, France
- 700 1_
- $a Casella, G $u Department of Cardiology, Ospedale Maggiore, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Zukermann, R $u Rambam Medical Health Center, Israel
- 700 1_
- $a Nikolaou, N $u Department of Cardiology, Konstantopouleio General Hospital, Greece
- 700 1_
- $a De Luca, L $u Department of Cardiology, S. Giovanni Evangelista Hospital, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Gierlotka, M $u Department of Cardiology, University of Opole, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Iakobishvili, Z $u Heart Institute, Holon Medical Center, Israel
- 700 1_
- $a Thiele, H $u Heart Center Leipzig, University Hospital, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Koutouzis, M $u Red Cross General Hospital, Greece
- 700 1_
- $a Sionis, A $u Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
- 700 1_
- $a Monteiro, S $u Coimbra University Hospital, Portugal
- 700 1_
- $a Beauloye, C $u Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, UCLouvain, Belgium
- 700 1_
- $a Held, C $u Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Sweden
- 700 1_
- $a Tint, D $u ICCO Clinics, Transilvania University, Romania
- 700 1_
- $a Zakke, I $u Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, Latvia
- 700 1_
- $a Serpytis, P $u Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Lithuania
- 700 1_
- $a Babic, Z $u University Hospital Centre, Sisters of Mercy, Croatia
- 700 1_
- $a Belohlavev, J $u 2nd Department of Medicine, Charles University, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Magdy, A $u National Heart Institution, Egypt
- 700 1_
- $a Sivagowry Rasalingam, M $u Department of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
- 700 1_
- $a Daly, K $u University College Hospital, Ireland
- 700 1_
- $a Arroyo, D $u Hôpital Cantonal Fribourg, Switzerland
- 700 1_
- $a Vavlukis, M $u PHO University Clinic of Cardiology, Macedonia
- 700 1_
- $a Radovanovic, N $u Clinical Center of Serbia, Emergency Center, Serbia
- 700 1_
- $a Trendafilova, E $u ICCU, National Cardiology Hospital, Bulgaria
- 700 1_
- $a Marandi, T $u North Estonia Medical Centre, Estonia $u Department of Cardiology, University of Tartu, Estonia
- 700 1_
- $a Hassenger, C $u Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Denmark $u Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
- 700 1_
- $a Lettino, M $u Division of Cardiology, San Gerardo Hospital, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Price, S $u Adult Intensive Care Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London
- 700 1_
- $a Bonnefoy, E $u Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Hospices Civils de Lyon, France
- 773 0_
- $w MED00186154 $t European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care $x 2048-8734 $g Roč. 9, č. 8 (2020), s. 993-1001
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31976740 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210728 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210830101307 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1690509 $s 1140157
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 9 $c 8 $d 993-1001 $e 20200124 $i 2048-8734 $m European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care $n Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care $x MED00186154
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210728