-
Something wrong with this record ?
Skin temperature contribution to the decrease in withdrawal latency following chronic constriction injury
L. Voděrová, Š. Šandera, T. Drobil, B. Plevová, Š. Vaculín
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Hyperalgesia etiology MeSH
- Constriction MeSH
- Rats MeSH
- Sciatic Nerve MeSH
- Neuralgia * MeSH
- Rats, Wistar MeSH
- Skin Temperature * MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Rats MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
BACKGROUND: Chronic constriction injury (CCI) is widely used as an animal neuropathic pain model. Neuropathic pain is considered to exist when withdrawal latency to thermal stimulation is decreased after inducing a CCI to the sciatic nerve. However, it is known that CCI leads to changes in skin temperature and that skin temperature can affect withdrawal latency. Aim of this study was to compare withdrawal latencies of constricted and contralateral hind limbs, to thermal stimulation, at the same artificially-induced skin temperatures. METHODS: Neuropathic pain was induced by four ligatures on the left sciatic nerve in adult male Wistar rats. Withdrawal latencies were measured from the 11th to 14th day after ligation, in different ambient temperatures, using the plantar test (Hargreaves method). By changing ambient we produced different hind limb skin temperatures. RESULTS: Our results show that (1) CCI cause an increase in skin temperature; (2) the withdrawal latency was inversely related to ambient and skin temperature in the same manner for both the ligated and contralateral hind limbs; and (3) withdrawal latencies did not differ significantly for the ligated and contralateral hind limbs when the temperature of the hind limbs was artificially made the same (i.e., by changing the ambient temperature). CONCLUSIONS: Withdrawal latencies to thermal stimulation did not differ on ligated and contralateral hind limb after CCI to the sciatic nerve if the temperature of the hind limbs was artificially or mathematically made the same. This finding may have significant impact on the interpretation results of neuropathic pain research.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21019765
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20250422091012.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210728e20200822xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113147 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32835779
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Voděrová, Lucia $u Charles University, Third Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology, Ke Karlovu 4, 120 00 Prague 2, Czech Republic $7 xx0331348
- 245 10
- $a Skin temperature contribution to the decrease in withdrawal latency following chronic constriction injury / $c L. Voděrová, Š. Šandera, T. Drobil, B. Plevová, Š. Vaculín
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Chronic constriction injury (CCI) is widely used as an animal neuropathic pain model. Neuropathic pain is considered to exist when withdrawal latency to thermal stimulation is decreased after inducing a CCI to the sciatic nerve. However, it is known that CCI leads to changes in skin temperature and that skin temperature can affect withdrawal latency. Aim of this study was to compare withdrawal latencies of constricted and contralateral hind limbs, to thermal stimulation, at the same artificially-induced skin temperatures. METHODS: Neuropathic pain was induced by four ligatures on the left sciatic nerve in adult male Wistar rats. Withdrawal latencies were measured from the 11th to 14th day after ligation, in different ambient temperatures, using the plantar test (Hargreaves method). By changing ambient we produced different hind limb skin temperatures. RESULTS: Our results show that (1) CCI cause an increase in skin temperature; (2) the withdrawal latency was inversely related to ambient and skin temperature in the same manner for both the ligated and contralateral hind limbs; and (3) withdrawal latencies did not differ significantly for the ligated and contralateral hind limbs when the temperature of the hind limbs was artificially made the same (i.e., by changing the ambient temperature). CONCLUSIONS: Withdrawal latencies to thermal stimulation did not differ on ligated and contralateral hind limb after CCI to the sciatic nerve if the temperature of the hind limbs was artificially or mathematically made the same. This finding may have significant impact on the interpretation results of neuropathic pain research.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a konstrikce $7 D003250
- 650 _2
- $a hyperalgezie $x etiologie $7 D006930
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 12
- $a neuralgie $7 D009437
- 650 _2
- $a krysa rodu Rattus $7 D051381
- 650 _2
- $a potkani Wistar $7 D017208
- 650 _2
- $a nervus ischiadicus $7 D012584
- 650 12
- $a teplota kůže $7 D012881
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Šandera, Štěpán $u Charles University, Third Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology, Ke Karlovu 4, 120 00 Prague 2, Czech Republic $7 xx0331349
- 700 1_
- $a Drobil, Tomáš $u Charles University, Third Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology, Ke Karlovu 4, 120 00 Prague 2, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Plevová, Barbora $u Charles University, Third Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology, Ke Karlovu 4, 120 00 Prague 2, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Vaculín, Šimon $u Charles University, Third Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology, Ke Karlovu 4, 120 00 Prague 2, Czech Republic. Electronic address: svaculin@lf3.cuni.cz
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003826 $t Physiology & behavior $x 1873-507X $g Roč. 227 (20200822), s. 113147
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32835779 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210728 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20250422091014 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1690552 $s 1140211
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 227 $c - $d 113147 $e 20200822 $i 1873-507X $m Physiology & behavior $n Physiol Behav $x MED00003826
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210728