-
Something wrong with this record ?
The Impact of Cesarean and Vaginal Delivery on Results of Psychological Cognitive Test in 5 Year Old Children
B. Blazkova, A. Pastorkova, I. Solansky, M. Veleminsky, M. Veleminsky, A. Rossnerova, K. Honkova, P. Rossner, RJ. Sram
Language English Country Switzerland
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
NV 18-09-00151
Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2007
PubMed Central
from 2018
Europe PubMed Central
from 2018
ProQuest Central
from 2018-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2014-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2018-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2007
- MeSH
- Cesarean Section * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Mothers MeSH
- Neuropsychological Tests MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Psychological Tests MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Delivery, Obstetric * MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
Background and objectives: The impact of cesarean and vaginal delivery on cognitive development was analyzed in 5 year old children. Materials and Methods: Two cohorts of 5 year old children born in the years 2013 and 2014 in Karvina (Northern Moravia) and Ceske Budejovice (Southern Bohemia) were studied for their cognitive development related to vaginal (n = 117) and cesarean types of delivery (n = 51). The Bender Visual Motor Gestalt Test (BG test) and the Raven Colored Progressive Matrices (RCPM test) were used as psychological tests. Results: In the comparison of vaginal delivery vs. cesarean section, the children delivered by cesarean section scored lower and, therefore, achieved poorer performance in cognitive tests compared to those born by vaginal delivery, as shown in the RCPM (p < 0.001) and in the BG test (p < 0.001). When mothers' education level was considered, the children whose mothers achieved a university degree scored higher in both the RCPM test (p < 0.001) and the BG test (p < 0.01) compared to the children of mothers with lower secondary education. When comparing mothers with a university degree to those with higher secondary education, there was a significant correlation between level of education and score achieved in the RCPM test (p < 0.001), but not in the BG test. Conclusions: According to our findings, the mode of delivery seems to have a significant influence on performance in psychological cognitive tests in 5 year old children in favor of those who were born by vaginal delivery. Since cesarean-born children scored notably below vaginally born children, it appears possible that cesarean delivery may have a convincingly adverse effect on children's further cognitive development.
Hospital Ceske Budejovice a s 370 01 Ceske Budejovice Czech Republic
Institute of Experimental Medicine CAS Videnska 1083 142 20 Prague Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21019967
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210830101549.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210728s2020 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/medicina56100554 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33096932
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Blazkova, Barbora $u Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South Bohemia, 370 05 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
- 245 14
- $a The Impact of Cesarean and Vaginal Delivery on Results of Psychological Cognitive Test in 5 Year Old Children / $c B. Blazkova, A. Pastorkova, I. Solansky, M. Veleminsky, M. Veleminsky, A. Rossnerova, K. Honkova, P. Rossner, RJ. Sram
- 520 9_
- $a Background and objectives: The impact of cesarean and vaginal delivery on cognitive development was analyzed in 5 year old children. Materials and Methods: Two cohorts of 5 year old children born in the years 2013 and 2014 in Karvina (Northern Moravia) and Ceske Budejovice (Southern Bohemia) were studied for their cognitive development related to vaginal (n = 117) and cesarean types of delivery (n = 51). The Bender Visual Motor Gestalt Test (BG test) and the Raven Colored Progressive Matrices (RCPM test) were used as psychological tests. Results: In the comparison of vaginal delivery vs. cesarean section, the children delivered by cesarean section scored lower and, therefore, achieved poorer performance in cognitive tests compared to those born by vaginal delivery, as shown in the RCPM (p < 0.001) and in the BG test (p < 0.001). When mothers' education level was considered, the children whose mothers achieved a university degree scored higher in both the RCPM test (p < 0.001) and the BG test (p < 0.01) compared to the children of mothers with lower secondary education. When comparing mothers with a university degree to those with higher secondary education, there was a significant correlation between level of education and score achieved in the RCPM test (p < 0.001), but not in the BG test. Conclusions: According to our findings, the mode of delivery seems to have a significant influence on performance in psychological cognitive tests in 5 year old children in favor of those who were born by vaginal delivery. Since cesarean-born children scored notably below vaginally born children, it appears possible that cesarean delivery may have a convincingly adverse effect on children's further cognitive development.
- 650 12
- $a císařský řez $7 D002585
- 650 _2
- $a předškolní dítě $7 D002675
- 650 12
- $a vedení porodu $7 D036861
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a matky $7 D009035
- 650 _2
- $a neuropsychologické testy $7 D009483
- 650 _2
- $a těhotenství $7 D011247
- 650 _2
- $a psychologické testy $7 D011581
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Pastorkova, Anna $u Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South Bohemia, 370 05 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic $u Institute of Experimental Medicine CAS, Videnska 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Solansky, Ivo $u Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South Bohemia, 370 05 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Veleminsky, Milos $u Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South Bohemia, 370 05 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic $u Hospital Ceske Budejovice, a.s., 370 01 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Veleminsky, Milos $u Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South Bohemia, 370 05 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Rossnerova, Andrea $u Institute of Experimental Medicine CAS, Videnska 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Honkova, Katerina $u Institute of Experimental Medicine CAS, Videnska 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Rossner, Pavel $u Institute of Experimental Medicine CAS, Videnska 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Sram, Radim J $u Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South Bohemia, 370 05 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic $u Institute of Experimental Medicine CAS, Videnska 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180386 $t Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) $x 1648-9144 $g Roč. 56, č. 10 (2020)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33096932 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210728 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210830101550 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1690705 $s 1140413
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 56 $c 10 $e 20201021 $i 1648-9144 $m Medicina $n Medicina (Kaunas) $x MED00180386
- GRA __
- $a NV 18-09-00151 $p Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210728