-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Cerebrospinal fluid oligoclonal IgM test in routine practice: Comparison with quantitative assessment of intrathecal IgM synthesis
D. Zeman, P. Kušnierová, F. Všianský, K. Reguliová, M. Škutová, I. Woznicová, O. Zapletalová, P. Hradílek
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- imunoglobulin M MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- oligoklonální proužky * MeSH
- roztroušená skleróza * diagnóza MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Intrathecal IgM synthesis demonstrated either as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-restricted oligoclonal (o-) IgM bands or calculated using various formulas has been linked to more aggressive multiple sclerosis (MS) course. However, the proportion of MS patients showing intrathecal IgM synthesis varies largely between studies. We aimed to explore the relation between different formulas and results of o-IgM, and to assess the frequency of o-IgM bands in an unselected series of samples. METHODS: 432 samples were analyzed for o-IgM, o-IgG and quantitative measures of IgM and IgG synthesis. IgM index and formulas of Reiber, Auer and Öhman were compared to the result of the o-IgM test. RESULTS: At the cut-off commonly used, the non-linear formulas for intrathecal synthesis were specific (>94%) but rather insensitive (<40% even at a cut-off of 4 CSF-restricted bands) compared to o-IgM. No significant difference was noted in the performance of different formulas. At a cut-off of 4 bands, 61% of MS patients, but none of the controls were positive for o-IgM. CONCLUSIONS: Formulas for intrathecal IgM synthesis are insensitive compared to o-IgM. We propose to evaluate samples with 2 or 3 extra-CSF IgM bands as borderline and only samples with 4 or more as definitely positive.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21020167
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210830101802.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210728s2020 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.cca.2020.05.021 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32416174
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Zeman, David $u Institute of Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic; Clinic of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic; Dept. of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Syllabova 19, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic. Electronic address: david.zeman@fno.cz
- 245 10
- $a Cerebrospinal fluid oligoclonal IgM test in routine practice: Comparison with quantitative assessment of intrathecal IgM synthesis / $c D. Zeman, P. Kušnierová, F. Všianský, K. Reguliová, M. Škutová, I. Woznicová, O. Zapletalová, P. Hradílek
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Intrathecal IgM synthesis demonstrated either as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-restricted oligoclonal (o-) IgM bands or calculated using various formulas has been linked to more aggressive multiple sclerosis (MS) course. However, the proportion of MS patients showing intrathecal IgM synthesis varies largely between studies. We aimed to explore the relation between different formulas and results of o-IgM, and to assess the frequency of o-IgM bands in an unselected series of samples. METHODS: 432 samples were analyzed for o-IgM, o-IgG and quantitative measures of IgM and IgG synthesis. IgM index and formulas of Reiber, Auer and Öhman were compared to the result of the o-IgM test. RESULTS: At the cut-off commonly used, the non-linear formulas for intrathecal synthesis were specific (>94%) but rather insensitive (<40% even at a cut-off of 4 CSF-restricted bands) compared to o-IgM. No significant difference was noted in the performance of different formulas. At a cut-off of 4 bands, 61% of MS patients, but none of the controls were positive for o-IgM. CONCLUSIONS: Formulas for intrathecal IgM synthesis are insensitive compared to o-IgM. We propose to evaluate samples with 2 or 3 extra-CSF IgM bands as borderline and only samples with 4 or more as definitely positive.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a imunoglobulin M $7 D007075
- 650 12
- $a roztroušená skleróza $x diagnóza $7 D009103
- 650 12
- $a oligoklonální proužky $7 D043025
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kušnierová, Pavlína $u Institute of Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic; Dept. of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Syllabova 19, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Všianský, František $u Institute of Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Reguliová, Katarína $u Clinic of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Škutová, Monika $u Clinic of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Woznicová, Ivana $u Clinic of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Zapletalová, Olga $u Clinic of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic; Dept. of Neurology and Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Syllabova 19, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Hradílek, Pavel $u Clinic of Neurology, University Hospital Ostrava, 17. listopadu 1790, 708 52 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00009464 $t Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry $x 1873-3492 $g Roč. 508, č. - (2020), s. 137-145
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32416174 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210728 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210830101802 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1690871 $s 1140613
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 508 $c - $d 137-145 $e 20200519 $i 1873-3492 $m Clinica chimica acta $n Clin Chim Acta $x MED00009464
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210728