-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Long-term Results of Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases in Terms of Primary Tumour Location and Clinical Risk Factors
V. Treska, M. Skala, K. Prochazkova, A. Svejdova, T. Petrakova, J. Sebek, I. Riha, J. Rosendorf, R. Polak, T. Skalicky, V. Liska
Jazyk angličtina Země Řecko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2004 do Před 2 roky
PubMed Central
od 2017
Europe PubMed Central
od 2017
Open Access Digital Library
od 2004-01-01
PubMed
32871799
DOI
10.21873/invivo.12087
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- hepatektomie MeSH
- kolorektální nádory * chirurgie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- míra přežití MeSH
- nádory jater * chirurgie MeSH
- nádory rekta * MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of primary tumour location and clinical risk factors for long-term results of surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CLMs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were evaluated in 636 patients. Patients were divided by tumour location (right-/left-sided colorectal cancer: RCRC/LCRC; rectal cancer), and age, gender, number and size of CLMs, type of liver surgery and interval from primary operation were evaluated. RESULTS: One-, 3- and 5-year OS and RFS were independent of primary tumour location (p<0.59). CLM diameter was negatively associated with OS for the whole cohort (p<0.002), and RCRC (p<0.03) and LCRC (p<0.04) groups, as well as for RFS of those with LCRC (p<0.04). CLM number was negatively associated with RFS for the whole cohort (p<0.0001), RCRC (p<0.02), LCRC (p<0.0001) and RC (p<0.02). Radiofrequency ablation and combined procedures led to worse OS for the whole cohort (p<0.03), and to worse RFS for the whole cohort (p<0.0003) and for those with LCRC (p<0.03). A shorter interval between primary colorectal cancer surgery and CLMs procedure was risky for poor OS and RFS of patients with CLMs from RCRC (p<0.05), LCRC (p<0.05) and RC (p<0.02). CONCLUSION: Primary tumour location together with clinical risk factors are important for long-term results of surgery CLMs.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21020186
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20251111122206.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210728s2020 gr f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.21873/invivo.12087 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32871799
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gr
- 100 1_
- $a Treska, Vladislav $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital, School of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic treska@fnplzen.cz
- 245 10
- $a Long-term Results of Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases in Terms of Primary Tumour Location and Clinical Risk Factors / $c V. Treska, M. Skala, K. Prochazkova, A. Svejdova, T. Petrakova, J. Sebek, I. Riha, J. Rosendorf, R. Polak, T. Skalicky, V. Liska
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of primary tumour location and clinical risk factors for long-term results of surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CLMs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were evaluated in 636 patients. Patients were divided by tumour location (right-/left-sided colorectal cancer: RCRC/LCRC; rectal cancer), and age, gender, number and size of CLMs, type of liver surgery and interval from primary operation were evaluated. RESULTS: One-, 3- and 5-year OS and RFS were independent of primary tumour location (p<0.59). CLM diameter was negatively associated with OS for the whole cohort (p<0.002), and RCRC (p<0.03) and LCRC (p<0.04) groups, as well as for RFS of those with LCRC (p<0.04). CLM number was negatively associated with RFS for the whole cohort (p<0.0001), RCRC (p<0.02), LCRC (p<0.0001) and RC (p<0.02). Radiofrequency ablation and combined procedures led to worse OS for the whole cohort (p<0.03), and to worse RFS for the whole cohort (p<0.0003) and for those with LCRC (p<0.03). A shorter interval between primary colorectal cancer surgery and CLMs procedure was risky for poor OS and RFS of patients with CLMs from RCRC (p<0.05), LCRC (p<0.05) and RC (p<0.02). CONCLUSION: Primary tumour location together with clinical risk factors are important for long-term results of surgery CLMs.
- 650 12
- $a kolorektální nádory $x chirurgie $7 D015179
- 650 _2
- $a hepatektomie $7 D006498
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a nádory jater $x chirurgie $7 D008113
- 650 12
- $a nádory rekta $7 D012004
- 650 _2
- $a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
- 650 _2
- $a míra přežití $7 D015996
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Skala, Martin $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital, School of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Procházková, Kristýna, $d 1982- $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital, School of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic $7 xx0227765
- 700 1_
- $a Svejdova, Aneta $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital, School of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Petrakova, Tereza $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital, School of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Sebek, Jakub $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital, School of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Riha, Ivan $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital, School of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Rosendorf, Jachym $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital, School of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Polák, Robert $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital, School of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic $7 xx0337757
- 700 1_
- $a Skalicky, Tomas $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital, School of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Liska, Vaclav $u Department of Surgery, University Hospital, School of Medicine in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00175831 $t In Vivo $x 1791-7549 $g Roč. 34, č. 5 (2020), s. 2675-2685
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32871799 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210728 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20251111122215 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1690889 $s 1140632
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 34 $c 5 $d 2675-2685 $e - $i 1791-7549 $m In Vivo $n In Vivo $x MED00175831
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210728