• Something wrong with this record ?

Psychometric testing of perceived implicit rationing of nursing care (PIRNCA)

D. Kalánková, R. Suhonen, M. Stolt, R. Kurucová, J. Katajisto, K. Žiaková, E. Gurková

. 2020 ; 76 (6) : 1469-1482. [pub] 20200406

Language English Country Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21020506

AIMS: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Perceived Implicit Rationing of Nursing Care (PIRNCA) instrument and to report the prevalence of rationed care at university and faculty hospitals. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. METHODS: The study was carried out at two university and five faculty hospitals in the Slovak Republic. Participants were 895 Registered Nurses recruited by the purposive sampling method between December 2017-July 2018. Data were collected using the PIRNCA instrument. Construct validity and reliability of the instrument were tested. RESULTS: The prevalence of rationed care at university and faculty hospitals was identified as being 42.1%. Furthermore, 87.6% of nurses reported rationing one or more nursing care activities. Using both statistical methods when evaluating the PIRNCA resulted in the confirmation that the tool is valid and reliable. CONCLUSION: Rationed care is a common phenomenon at university and faculty hospitals. The PIRNCA is a suitable instrument to measure the phenomenon in adult acute care units because of its high reliability and validity. We recommend using the instrument in different contexts, not only for specific conditions that were presented for this study. IMPACT: Rationed care at university and faculty hospitals has never been reported. Psychometric properties of the instrument that measures nurses ́ perception of rationed care have never been evaluated by using different approaches. The most frequently rationed nursing care activities are those that nurses are competent to initiate on the basis of their knowledge and skills - the independent ones. The PIRNCA is a valid and reliable instrument. Hospital management can use the instrument to explore the prevalence of rationed care, followed by the application of prevention strategies. Our findings represent the base for further exploration of rationed care using the PIRNCA.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21020506
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230310103030.0
007      
ta
008      
210728s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/jan.14351 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32180252
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Kalánková, Dominika, $u Department of Nursing, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovak Republic $d 1993- $7 xx0230232
245    10
$a Psychometric testing of perceived implicit rationing of nursing care (PIRNCA) / $c D. Kalánková, R. Suhonen, M. Stolt, R. Kurucová, J. Katajisto, K. Žiaková, E. Gurková
520    9_
$a AIMS: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Perceived Implicit Rationing of Nursing Care (PIRNCA) instrument and to report the prevalence of rationed care at university and faculty hospitals. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. METHODS: The study was carried out at two university and five faculty hospitals in the Slovak Republic. Participants were 895 Registered Nurses recruited by the purposive sampling method between December 2017-July 2018. Data were collected using the PIRNCA instrument. Construct validity and reliability of the instrument were tested. RESULTS: The prevalence of rationed care at university and faculty hospitals was identified as being 42.1%. Furthermore, 87.6% of nurses reported rationing one or more nursing care activities. Using both statistical methods when evaluating the PIRNCA resulted in the confirmation that the tool is valid and reliable. CONCLUSION: Rationed care is a common phenomenon at university and faculty hospitals. The PIRNCA is a suitable instrument to measure the phenomenon in adult acute care units because of its high reliability and validity. We recommend using the instrument in different contexts, not only for specific conditions that were presented for this study. IMPACT: Rationed care at university and faculty hospitals has never been reported. Psychometric properties of the instrument that measures nurses ́ perception of rationed care have never been evaluated by using different approaches. The most frequently rationed nursing care activities are those that nurses are competent to initiate on the basis of their knowledge and skills - the independent ones. The PIRNCA is a valid and reliable instrument. Hospital management can use the instrument to explore the prevalence of rationed care, followed by the application of prevention strategies. Our findings represent the base for further exploration of rationed care using the PIRNCA.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a přidělování zdravotní péče $x organizace a řízení $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D015276
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a ošetřovatelská péče $x organizace a řízení $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D009732
650    _2
$a personál sesterský nemocniční $x organizace a řízení $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D009741
650    _2
$a psychometrie $7 D011594
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    12
$a sociální validita - výzkum $7 D063586
650    _2
$a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
651    _2
$a Slovenská republika $7 D018154
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Suhonen, Riitta $u Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland $u Welfare Division, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
700    1_
$a Stolt, Minna $u Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
700    1_
$a Kurucová, Radka $u Department of Nursing, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovak Republic
700    1_
$a Katajisto, Jouko $u Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
700    1_
$a Žiaková, Katarína $u Department of Nursing, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovak Republic
700    1_
$a Gurková, Elena $u Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00002500 $t Journal of advanced nursing $x 1365-2648 $g Roč. 76, č. 6 (2020), s. 1469-1482
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32180252 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210728 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230310103028 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1691140 $s 1140952
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 76 $c 6 $d 1469-1482 $e 20200406 $i 1365-2648 $m Journal of advanced nursing $n J Adv Nurs $x MED00002500
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210728

Find record

Citation metrics

Logged in users only

Archiving options