• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Methodological Insight Into Mosquito Microbiome Studies

SM. Rodríguez-Ruano, E. Juhaňáková, J. Vávra, E. Nováková

. 2020 ; 10 (-) : 86. [pub] 20200317

Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21020682

Symbiotic bacteria affect competence for pathogen transmission in insect vectors, including mosquitoes. However, knowledge on mosquito-microbiome-pathogen interactions remains limited, largely due to methodological reasons. The current, cost-effective practice of sample pooling used in mosquito surveillance and epidemiology prevents correlation of individual traits (i.e., microbiome profile) and infection status. Moreover, many mosquito studies employ laboratory-reared colonies that do not necessarily reflect the natural microbiome composition and variation in wild populations. As a consequence, epidemiological and microbiome studies in mosquitoes are to some extent uncoupled, and the interactions among pathogens, microbiomes, and natural mosquito populations remain poorly understood. This study focuses on the effect the pooling practice poses on mosquito microbiome profiles, and tests different approaches to find an optimized low-cost methodology for extensive sampling while allowing for accurate, individual-level microbiome studies. We tested the effect of pooling by comparing wild-caught, individually processed mosquitoes with pooled samples. With individual mosquitoes, we also tested two methodological aspects that directly affect the cost and feasibility of broad-scale molecular studies: sample preservation and tissue dissection. Pooling affected both alpha- and beta-diversity measures of the microbiome, highlighting the importance of using individual samples when possible. Both RNA and DNA yields were higher when using inexpensive reagents such as NAP (nucleic acid preservation) buffer or absolute ethanol, without freezing for short-term storage. Microbiome alpha- and beta-diversity did not show overall significant differences between the tested treatments compared to the controls (freshly extracted samples or dissected guts). However, the use of standardized protocols is highly recommended to avoid methodological bias in the data.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21020682
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210830102316.0
007      
ta
008      
210728s2020 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00086 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32257962
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Rodríguez-Ruano, Sonia M $u Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Ceske Budejovice, Czechia
245    10
$a Methodological Insight Into Mosquito Microbiome Studies / $c SM. Rodríguez-Ruano, E. Juhaňáková, J. Vávra, E. Nováková
520    9_
$a Symbiotic bacteria affect competence for pathogen transmission in insect vectors, including mosquitoes. However, knowledge on mosquito-microbiome-pathogen interactions remains limited, largely due to methodological reasons. The current, cost-effective practice of sample pooling used in mosquito surveillance and epidemiology prevents correlation of individual traits (i.e., microbiome profile) and infection status. Moreover, many mosquito studies employ laboratory-reared colonies that do not necessarily reflect the natural microbiome composition and variation in wild populations. As a consequence, epidemiological and microbiome studies in mosquitoes are to some extent uncoupled, and the interactions among pathogens, microbiomes, and natural mosquito populations remain poorly understood. This study focuses on the effect the pooling practice poses on mosquito microbiome profiles, and tests different approaches to find an optimized low-cost methodology for extensive sampling while allowing for accurate, individual-level microbiome studies. We tested the effect of pooling by comparing wild-caught, individually processed mosquitoes with pooled samples. With individual mosquitoes, we also tested two methodological aspects that directly affect the cost and feasibility of broad-scale molecular studies: sample preservation and tissue dissection. Pooling affected both alpha- and beta-diversity measures of the microbiome, highlighting the importance of using individual samples when possible. Both RNA and DNA yields were higher when using inexpensive reagents such as NAP (nucleic acid preservation) buffer or absolute ethanol, without freezing for short-term storage. Microbiome alpha- and beta-diversity did not show overall significant differences between the tested treatments compared to the controls (freshly extracted samples or dissected guts). However, the use of standardized protocols is highly recommended to avoid methodological bias in the data.
650    _2
$a Aedes $x mikrobiologie $7 D000330
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a Bacteria $x klasifikace $x genetika $7 D001419
650    _2
$a Culex $x mikrobiologie $7 D003465
650    _2
$a střevní mikroflóra $7 D000069196
650    _2
$a mikrobiologické techniky $7 D008828
650    12
$a mikrobiota $7 D064307
650    _2
$a komáří přenašeči $x mikrobiologie $7 D000072138
650    _2
$a ochrana biologická $7 D011309
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Juhaňáková, Eliška $u Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Ceske Budejovice, Czechia
700    1_
$a Vávra, Jakub $u Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Ceske Budejovice, Czechia
700    1_
$a Nováková, Eva $u Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Ceske Budejovice, Czechia $u Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre of ASCR, Ceske Budejovice, Czechia
773    0_
$w MED00182987 $t Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology $x 2235-2988 $g Roč. 10, č. - (2020), s. 86
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32257962 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20210728 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210830102316 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1691289 $s 1141128
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 10 $c - $d 86 $e 20200317 $i 2235-2988 $m Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology $n Front Cell Infect Microbiol $x MED00182987
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20210728

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...