-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Methodological Insight Into Mosquito Microbiome Studies
SM. Rodríguez-Ruano, E. Juhaňáková, J. Vávra, E. Nováková
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2011
Free Medical Journals
od 2011
PubMed Central
od 2011
Europe PubMed Central
od 2011
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2011
PubMed
32257962
DOI
10.3389/fcimb.2020.00086
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- Aedes mikrobiologie MeSH
- Bacteria klasifikace genetika MeSH
- Culex mikrobiologie MeSH
- komáří přenašeči mikrobiologie MeSH
- mikrobiologické techniky MeSH
- mikrobiota * MeSH
- ochrana biologická MeSH
- střevní mikroflóra MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Symbiotic bacteria affect competence for pathogen transmission in insect vectors, including mosquitoes. However, knowledge on mosquito-microbiome-pathogen interactions remains limited, largely due to methodological reasons. The current, cost-effective practice of sample pooling used in mosquito surveillance and epidemiology prevents correlation of individual traits (i.e., microbiome profile) and infection status. Moreover, many mosquito studies employ laboratory-reared colonies that do not necessarily reflect the natural microbiome composition and variation in wild populations. As a consequence, epidemiological and microbiome studies in mosquitoes are to some extent uncoupled, and the interactions among pathogens, microbiomes, and natural mosquito populations remain poorly understood. This study focuses on the effect the pooling practice poses on mosquito microbiome profiles, and tests different approaches to find an optimized low-cost methodology for extensive sampling while allowing for accurate, individual-level microbiome studies. We tested the effect of pooling by comparing wild-caught, individually processed mosquitoes with pooled samples. With individual mosquitoes, we also tested two methodological aspects that directly affect the cost and feasibility of broad-scale molecular studies: sample preservation and tissue dissection. Pooling affected both alpha- and beta-diversity measures of the microbiome, highlighting the importance of using individual samples when possible. Both RNA and DNA yields were higher when using inexpensive reagents such as NAP (nucleic acid preservation) buffer or absolute ethanol, without freezing for short-term storage. Microbiome alpha- and beta-diversity did not show overall significant differences between the tested treatments compared to the controls (freshly extracted samples or dissected guts). However, the use of standardized protocols is highly recommended to avoid methodological bias in the data.
Department of Parasitology Faculty of Science University of South Bohemia Ceske Budejovice Czechia
Institute of Parasitology Biology Centre of ASCR Ceske Budejovice Czechia
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21020682
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210830102316.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210728s2020 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00086 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32257962
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Rodríguez-Ruano, Sonia M $u Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Ceske Budejovice, Czechia
- 245 10
- $a Methodological Insight Into Mosquito Microbiome Studies / $c SM. Rodríguez-Ruano, E. Juhaňáková, J. Vávra, E. Nováková
- 520 9_
- $a Symbiotic bacteria affect competence for pathogen transmission in insect vectors, including mosquitoes. However, knowledge on mosquito-microbiome-pathogen interactions remains limited, largely due to methodological reasons. The current, cost-effective practice of sample pooling used in mosquito surveillance and epidemiology prevents correlation of individual traits (i.e., microbiome profile) and infection status. Moreover, many mosquito studies employ laboratory-reared colonies that do not necessarily reflect the natural microbiome composition and variation in wild populations. As a consequence, epidemiological and microbiome studies in mosquitoes are to some extent uncoupled, and the interactions among pathogens, microbiomes, and natural mosquito populations remain poorly understood. This study focuses on the effect the pooling practice poses on mosquito microbiome profiles, and tests different approaches to find an optimized low-cost methodology for extensive sampling while allowing for accurate, individual-level microbiome studies. We tested the effect of pooling by comparing wild-caught, individually processed mosquitoes with pooled samples. With individual mosquitoes, we also tested two methodological aspects that directly affect the cost and feasibility of broad-scale molecular studies: sample preservation and tissue dissection. Pooling affected both alpha- and beta-diversity measures of the microbiome, highlighting the importance of using individual samples when possible. Both RNA and DNA yields were higher when using inexpensive reagents such as NAP (nucleic acid preservation) buffer or absolute ethanol, without freezing for short-term storage. Microbiome alpha- and beta-diversity did not show overall significant differences between the tested treatments compared to the controls (freshly extracted samples or dissected guts). However, the use of standardized protocols is highly recommended to avoid methodological bias in the data.
- 650 _2
- $a Aedes $x mikrobiologie $7 D000330
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a Bacteria $x klasifikace $x genetika $7 D001419
- 650 _2
- $a Culex $x mikrobiologie $7 D003465
- 650 _2
- $a střevní mikroflóra $7 D000069196
- 650 _2
- $a mikrobiologické techniky $7 D008828
- 650 12
- $a mikrobiota $7 D064307
- 650 _2
- $a komáří přenašeči $x mikrobiologie $7 D000072138
- 650 _2
- $a ochrana biologická $7 D011309
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Juhaňáková, Eliška $u Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Ceske Budejovice, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Vávra, Jakub $u Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Ceske Budejovice, Czechia
- 700 1_
- $a Nováková, Eva $u Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Ceske Budejovice, Czechia $u Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre of ASCR, Ceske Budejovice, Czechia
- 773 0_
- $w MED00182987 $t Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology $x 2235-2988 $g Roč. 10, č. - (2020), s. 86
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32257962 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210728 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210830102316 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1691289 $s 1141128
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 10 $c - $d 86 $e 20200317 $i 2235-2988 $m Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology $n Front Cell Infect Microbiol $x MED00182987
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210728