-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Ethics of Radiological Protection-recent developments
F. Zölzer
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 1996 do Před 1 rokem
Open Access Digital Library
od 1996-01-01
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost)
od 2006-03-01 do Před 1 rokem
PubMed
29688412
DOI
10.1093/pubmed/fdy069
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- bioetika * MeSH
- dobročinnost MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- radiační ochrana * MeSH
- sociální odpovědnost MeSH
- sociální spravedlnost MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) has recently reviewed the ethical foundations of its recommendations. The approach taken in its report is similar to principlism, i.e. the system of Beauchamp and Childress proposed in their 'Principles of Biomedical Ethics.' The commission identifies a number of 'core values' which have helped shape the evolution of the ICRP system of radiological protection, namely 'Beneficence and non-maleficence', 'Prudence', 'Justice' and 'Dignity'. In addition, 'procedural values' are cited that are important for the system's applications in practice, 'Accountability', 'Transparency' and 'Inclusiveness (Stakeholder Participation)'. It is emphasized that these values are common to or at least acceptable for people from different cultural backgrounds, which for an endeavour as global in nature as radiological protection seems to be quite important and appropriate. Thus, the ICRP document on 'Ethics of radiological protection' could set a standard for other areas.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21020734
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210830102405.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 210728s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/pubmed/fdy069 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29688412
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Zölzer, F $u Institute of Radiology, Toxicology, and Civil Protection, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South Bohemia, 37001 České Budějovice, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Ethics of Radiological Protection-recent developments / $c F. Zölzer
- 520 9_
- $a The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) has recently reviewed the ethical foundations of its recommendations. The approach taken in its report is similar to principlism, i.e. the system of Beauchamp and Childress proposed in their 'Principles of Biomedical Ethics.' The commission identifies a number of 'core values' which have helped shape the evolution of the ICRP system of radiological protection, namely 'Beneficence and non-maleficence', 'Prudence', 'Justice' and 'Dignity'. In addition, 'procedural values' are cited that are important for the system's applications in practice, 'Accountability', 'Transparency' and 'Inclusiveness (Stakeholder Participation)'. It is emphasized that these values are common to or at least acceptable for people from different cultural backgrounds, which for an endeavour as global in nature as radiological protection seems to be quite important and appropriate. Thus, the ICRP document on 'Ethics of radiological protection' could set a standard for other areas.
- 650 _2
- $a dobročinnost $7 D026686
- 650 12
- $a bioetika $7 D001675
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a radiační ochrana $7 D011835
- 650 _2
- $a sociální spravedlnost $7 D012935
- 650 _2
- $a sociální odpovědnost $7 D012941
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008741 $t Journal of public health (Oxford, England) $x 1741-3850 $g Roč. 42, č. 1 (2020), s. 183-187
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29688412 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20210728 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210830102405 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1691335 $s 1141180
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 42 $c 1 $d 183-187 $e 20200228 $i 1741-3850 $m Journal of public health $n J Public Health $x MED00008741
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20210728