Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Why Do People (Not) Engage in Social Distancing? Proximate and Ultimate Analyses of Norm-Following During the COVID-19 Pandemic

JO. Norton, KC. Evans, AY. Semchenko, L. Al-Shawaf, DMG. Lewis

. 2021 ; 12 (-) : 648206. [pub] 20210623

Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Journal Article

COVID-19 has had a profound negative effect on many aspects of human life. While pharmacological solutions are being developed and implemented, the onus of mitigating the impact of the virus falls, in part, on individual citizens and their adherence to public health guidelines. However, promoting adherence to these guidelines has proven challenging. There is a pressing need to understand the factors that influence people's adherence to these guidelines in order to improve public compliance. To this end, the current study investigated whether people's perceptions of others' adherence predict their own adherence. We also investigated whether any influence of perceived social norms was mediated by perceptions of the moral wrongness of non-adherence, anticipated shame for non-adherence, or perceptions of disease severity. One hundred fifty-two Australians participated in our study between June 6, 2020 and August 21, 2020. Findings from this preliminary investigation suggest that (1) people match their behavior to perceived social norms, and (2) this is driven, at least in part, by people using others' behavior as a cue to the severity of disease threat. Such findings provide insight into the proximate and ultimate bases of norm-following behavior, and shed preliminary light on public health-related behavior in the context of a pandemic. Although further research is needed, the results of this study-which suggest that people use others' behavior as a cue to how serious the pandemic is and as a guide for their own behavior-could have important implications for public health organizations, social movements, and political leaders and the role they play in the fight against epidemics and pandemics.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21024519
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20211013133906.0
007      
ta
008      
211006s2021 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648206 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34276471
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Norton, James O $u College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia
245    10
$a Why Do People (Not) Engage in Social Distancing? Proximate and Ultimate Analyses of Norm-Following During the COVID-19 Pandemic / $c JO. Norton, KC. Evans, AY. Semchenko, L. Al-Shawaf, DMG. Lewis
520    9_
$a COVID-19 has had a profound negative effect on many aspects of human life. While pharmacological solutions are being developed and implemented, the onus of mitigating the impact of the virus falls, in part, on individual citizens and their adherence to public health guidelines. However, promoting adherence to these guidelines has proven challenging. There is a pressing need to understand the factors that influence people's adherence to these guidelines in order to improve public compliance. To this end, the current study investigated whether people's perceptions of others' adherence predict their own adherence. We also investigated whether any influence of perceived social norms was mediated by perceptions of the moral wrongness of non-adherence, anticipated shame for non-adherence, or perceptions of disease severity. One hundred fifty-two Australians participated in our study between June 6, 2020 and August 21, 2020. Findings from this preliminary investigation suggest that (1) people match their behavior to perceived social norms, and (2) this is driven, at least in part, by people using others' behavior as a cue to the severity of disease threat. Such findings provide insight into the proximate and ultimate bases of norm-following behavior, and shed preliminary light on public health-related behavior in the context of a pandemic. Although further research is needed, the results of this study-which suggest that people use others' behavior as a cue to how serious the pandemic is and as a guide for their own behavior-could have important implications for public health organizations, social movements, and political leaders and the role they play in the fight against epidemics and pandemics.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Evans, Kortnee C $u College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia
700    1_
$a Semchenko, Ayten Yesim $u Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czechia
700    1_
$a Al-Shawaf, Laith $u Department of Psychology, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO, United States $u Lyda Hill Institute for Human Resilience, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs, CO, United States
700    1_
$a Lewis, David M G $u College of Science, Health, Engineering and Education, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia $u Centre for Healthy Ageing, Health Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia
773    0_
$w MED00174603 $t Frontiers in psychology $x 1664-1078 $g Roč. 12, č. - (2021), s. 648206
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34276471 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20211006 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20211013133904 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1708355 $s 1145016
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 12 $c - $d 648206 $e 20210623 $i 1664-1078 $m Frontiers in psychology $n Front Psychol $x MED00174603
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20211006

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...