• Something wrong with this record ?

Periprocedural safety profile of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM)-a retrospective analysis of adverse events according to two different classifications

D. Simkova, J. Mares, Z. Vackova, T. Hucl, P. Stirand, E. Kieslichova, O. Ryska, J. Spicak, S. Drazilova, E. Veseliny, J. Martinek

. 2023 ; 37 (2) : 1242-1251. [pub] 20220928

Language English Country Germany

Document type Journal Article

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc23004435

BACKGROUND: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is nowadays a standard method for treatment of achalasia; nevertheless, it remains an invasive intervention with corresponding risk of adverse events (AEs). The classification and grading of AEs are still a matter of discussion. The aim of our retrospective study was to assess the occurrence of all "undesirable" events and "true" adverse events in patients undergoing POEM and to compare the outcomes when either Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) or American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) lexicon classification applied. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively managed database of all patients who had undergone POEM between December 2012 and August 2018. We assessed the pre-, peri-, and early-postoperative (up to patient's discharge) undesirable events (including those not fulfilling criteria for AEs) and "true" AEs according the definition in either of the classifications. RESULTS: A total of 231 patients have successfully undergone 244 POEM procedures (13 × re-POEM). Twenty-nine procedures (11.9%) passed uneventfully, while in 215 procedures (88.1%), a total of 440 undesirable events occurred. The CDC identified 27 AEs (17 minor, 10 major) occurring in 23/244 (9.4%) procedures. The ASGE lexicon identified identical 27 AEs (21 mild or moderate, 6 severe or fatal) resulting in the severity distribution of AEs being the only difference between the two classifications. Only the absence of previous treatment was found to be a risk factor [p = 0.047, OR with 95% CI: 4.55 (1.02; 20.25)] in the combined logistic regression model. CONCLUSION: Undesirable events are common in patients undergoing POEM but the incidence of true AEs is low according to both classifications. Severe adverse events are infrequent irrespective of the classification applied. CDC may be more appropriate than ASGE lexicon for classifying POEM-related AEs given a surgical nature of this procedure.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc23004435
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20230425141403.0
007      
ta
008      
230418s2023 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00464-022-09621-z $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)36171448
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Simkova, Dagmar $u Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine IKEM, Videnska 1921, 140 21, Prague 4, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000192330602
245    10
$a Periprocedural safety profile of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM)-a retrospective analysis of adverse events according to two different classifications / $c D. Simkova, J. Mares, Z. Vackova, T. Hucl, P. Stirand, E. Kieslichova, O. Ryska, J. Spicak, S. Drazilova, E. Veseliny, J. Martinek
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is nowadays a standard method for treatment of achalasia; nevertheless, it remains an invasive intervention with corresponding risk of adverse events (AEs). The classification and grading of AEs are still a matter of discussion. The aim of our retrospective study was to assess the occurrence of all "undesirable" events and "true" adverse events in patients undergoing POEM and to compare the outcomes when either Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) or American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) lexicon classification applied. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively managed database of all patients who had undergone POEM between December 2012 and August 2018. We assessed the pre-, peri-, and early-postoperative (up to patient's discharge) undesirable events (including those not fulfilling criteria for AEs) and "true" AEs according the definition in either of the classifications. RESULTS: A total of 231 patients have successfully undergone 244 POEM procedures (13 × re-POEM). Twenty-nine procedures (11.9%) passed uneventfully, while in 215 procedures (88.1%), a total of 440 undesirable events occurred. The CDC identified 27 AEs (17 minor, 10 major) occurring in 23/244 (9.4%) procedures. The ASGE lexicon identified identical 27 AEs (21 mild or moderate, 6 severe or fatal) resulting in the severity distribution of AEs being the only difference between the two classifications. Only the absence of previous treatment was found to be a risk factor [p = 0.047, OR with 95% CI: 4.55 (1.02; 20.25)] in the combined logistic regression model. CONCLUSION: Undesirable events are common in patients undergoing POEM but the incidence of true AEs is low according to both classifications. Severe adverse events are infrequent irrespective of the classification applied. CDC may be more appropriate than ASGE lexicon for classifying POEM-related AEs given a surgical nature of this procedure.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    12
$a achalázie jícnu $x chirurgie $7 D004931
650    12
$a chirurgie trávicího traktu $7 D013505
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
650    12
$a myotomie $x metody $7 D000074433
650    12
$a endoskopické operace přirozenými otvory $x metody $7 D057605
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a dolní jícnový svěrač $x chirurgie $7 D049630
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Mares, Jan $u Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine IKEM, Videnska 1921, 140 21, Prague 4, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000247273685
700    1_
$a Vackova, Zuzana $u Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine IKEM, Videnska 1921, 140 21, Prague 4, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000204435752
700    1_
$a Hucl, Tomas $u Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine IKEM, Videnska 1921, 140 21, Prague 4, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000256484011 $7 xx0077546
700    1_
$a Stirand, Petr $u Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine IKEM, Videnska 1921, 140 21, Prague 4, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kieslichova, Eva $u Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine IKEM, Videnska 1921, 140 21, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000000023930623X
700    1_
$a Ryska, Ondrej $u Royal Lancaster Infirmary, University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust, Lancaster, UK $1 https://orcid.org/000000020438895X
700    1_
$a Spicak, Julius $u Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine IKEM, Videnska 1921, 140 21, Prague 4, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000238232881
700    1_
$a Drazilova, Sylvia $u 2Nd Department of Internal Medicine, PJ Safarik University and L. Pasteur University Hospital, Trieda SNP 1, 040 11, Kosice, Slovakia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000324486757
700    1_
$a Veseliny, Eduard $u 2Nd Department of Internal Medicine, PJ Safarik University and L. Pasteur University Hospital, Trieda SNP 1, 040 11, Kosice, Slovakia $1 https://orcid.org/0000000182567470
700    1_
$a Martinek, Jan $u Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine IKEM, Videnska 1921, 140 21, Prague 4, Czech Republic. jan.martinek@volny.cz $u Institute of Physiology, 1St Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. jan.martinek@volny.cz $u Faculty of Medicine, Ostrava University, Ostrava, Czech Republic. jan.martinek@volny.cz $1 https://orcid.org/0000000214154719 $7 jn20000919535
773    0_
$w MED00004464 $t Surgical endoscopy $x 1432-2218 $g Roč. 37, č. 2 (2023), s. 1242-1251
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36171448 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20230418 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20230425141400 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1924866 $s 1190644
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2023 $b 37 $c 2 $d 1242-1251 $e 20220928 $i 1432-2218 $m Surgical endoscopy $n Surg Endosc $x MED00004464
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20230418

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options