-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
The validation of the Czech version of the Delirium Observation Scale and the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale for delirium screening in patients with locomotive apparatus trauma
Blažena Ševčíková, Hana Matějovská Kubešová, Lenka Šáteková, Elena Gurková
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2014
Free Medical Journals
od 2010
ProQuest Central
od 2018-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2014-01-01
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost)
od 2014-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2018-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2014
- MeSH
- delirium * diagnóza ošetřování MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- ošetřovatelské zhodnocení metody MeSH
- pozorování metody MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- senzitivita a specificita MeSH
- traumatologie MeSH
- záznam o duševním stavu MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
Aim: To validate the Czech version of the Delirium Observation Scale and the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale as screening instruments for detecting of delirium in a traumatology department. Design: A prospective cohort study. Methods: The study included 400 patients hospitalized in the traumatology department, University Hospital, Olomouc. The receiver operating characteristics analysis, sensitivity and specificity values and positive and negative predictive values for the screening delirium symptoms were calculated. Results: The average duration of delirium was 2.78 days. The Delirium Observation Scale (DOS) screening instrument produced the best predictive validity values (sensitivity 97.6%, specificity 96.2%), followed by the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (Nu-DESC) (sensitivity 92.7%, specificity 96.5%). Both screening instruments have comparable psychometric properties as well as features in the area of the already mentioned feasibility. The largest differences between the psychometric features of the screening instruments were detected in the Nu-DESC instrument in the area of sensitivity. Conclusion: The benefit of the research lies in obtaining the predictive validity values for the DOS and Nu-DESC screening instruments in patients with locomotive apparatus trauma, having had surgical or conservative treatment. Our results may support a systematic and evidence-based implementation of the screening instruments for detecting of delirium in a clinical setting.
Department of Nursing Faculty of Health Sciences Palacký University in Olomouc Czech Republic
Department of Nursing Faculty of Medicine University of Ostrava Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21024836
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20211111154830.0
- 007
- cr|cn|
- 008
- 211013s2021 xr d f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.15452/cejnm.2021.12.0011 $2 doi
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Ševčíková, Blažena $u Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Czech Republic (student) $7 xx0217086
- 245 14
- $a The validation of the Czech version of the Delirium Observation Scale and the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale for delirium screening in patients with locomotive apparatus trauma / $c Blažena Ševčíková, Hana Matějovská Kubešová, Lenka Šáteková, Elena Gurková
- 520 9_
- $a Aim: To validate the Czech version of the Delirium Observation Scale and the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale as screening instruments for detecting of delirium in a traumatology department. Design: A prospective cohort study. Methods: The study included 400 patients hospitalized in the traumatology department, University Hospital, Olomouc. The receiver operating characteristics analysis, sensitivity and specificity values and positive and negative predictive values for the screening delirium symptoms were calculated. Results: The average duration of delirium was 2.78 days. The Delirium Observation Scale (DOS) screening instrument produced the best predictive validity values (sensitivity 97.6%, specificity 96.2%), followed by the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (Nu-DESC) (sensitivity 92.7%, specificity 96.5%). Both screening instruments have comparable psychometric properties as well as features in the area of the already mentioned feasibility. The largest differences between the psychometric features of the screening instruments were detected in the Nu-DESC instrument in the area of sensitivity. Conclusion: The benefit of the research lies in obtaining the predictive validity values for the DOS and Nu-DESC screening instruments in patients with locomotive apparatus trauma, having had surgical or conservative treatment. Our results may support a systematic and evidence-based implementation of the screening instruments for detecting of delirium in a clinical setting.
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a delirium $x diagnóza $x ošetřování $7 D003693
- 650 _2
- $a záznam o duševním stavu $7 D008609
- 650 _2
- $a pozorování $x metody $7 D019370
- 650 _2
- $a ošetřovatelské zhodnocení $x metody $7 D009730
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 650 _2
- $a traumatologie $7 D014194
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 700 1_
- $a Matějovská Kubešová, Hana, $u Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Czech Republic $d 1957- $7 nlk20000083650
- 700 1_
- $a Šáteková, Lenka $u Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacký University in Olomouc, Czech Republic $7 xx0212330
- 700 1_
- $a Gurková, Elena $u Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacký University in Olomouc, Czech Republic $7 utb2010598547
- 773 0_
- $t Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery $x 2336-3517 $g Roč. 12, č. 3 (2021), s. 394-404 $w MED00183333
- 856 41
- $u https://cejnm.osu.cz/artkey/cjn-202103-0004_the-validation-of-the-czech-version-of-the-delirium-observation-scale-and-the-nursing-delirium-screening-scale.php $y plný text volně přístupný
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b online $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20211013 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20211111154827 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1714072 $s 1145343
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 12 $c 3 $d 394-404 $e 20210907 $i 2336-3517 $m Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery $x MED00183333
- LZP __
- $c NLK109 $d 20211111 $b NLK111 $a Actavia-MED00183333-20211013