• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The efficiency of antineoplastic drug contamination removal by widely used disinfectants-laboratory and hospital studies

L. Bláhová, J. Kuta, L. Doležalová, Š. Kozáková, T. Krovová, L. Bláha

. 2021 ; 94 (7) : 1687-1702. [pub] 20210318

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21024915

Grantová podpora
NV18-09-00188 Agentura Pro Zdravotnický Výzkum České Republiky
LM2018121 Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy

E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 2003-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2003-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Public Health Database (ProQuest) od 2003-01-01 do Před 1 rokem

OBJECTIVE: Antineoplastic drugs (ADs) pose risks to healthcare staff. Surface disinfectants are used in hospitals to prevent microbial contamination but the efficiency of disinfectants to degrade ADs is not known. We studied nine disinfectants on ten ADs in the standardized laboratory and realistic in situ hospital conditions. METHODS: A survey in 43 hospitals prioritized nine most commonly used disinfections based on different ingredients. These were tested on inert stainless steel and in situ on contaminated hospital flooring. The effects against ten ADs were studied by LC-MS/MS (Cyclophosphamide CP; Ifosfamide IF; Capecitabine CAP; Sunitinib SUN; Methotrexate MET; Doxorubicin DOX; Irinotecan IRI; Paclitaxel PX; 5-Fluorouracil FU) and ICP-MS (Pt as a marker of platinum-based ADs). RESULTS: Monitoring of the floor contamination in 26 hospitals showed that the most contaminated are the outpatient clinics that suffer from a large turnover of staff and patients and have limited preventive measures. The most frequent ADs were Pt, PX, FU and CP with maxima exceeding the recommended 1 ng/cm2 limit by up to 140 times. IRI, FU, MET, DOX and SUN were efficiently removed by hydrolysis in clean water and present thus lower occupational risk. Disinfectants based on hydrogen peroxide were efficient against PX and FU (> 70% degradation) but less against other ADs, such as carcinogenic CP or IF, IRI and CAP. The most efficient were the active chlorine and peracetic acid-based products, which however release irritating toxic vapors. The innovative in situ testing of ADs previously accumulated in hospital flooring showed highly problematic removal of carcinogenic CP and showed that alcohol-based disinfectants may mobilize persistent ADs contamination from deeper floor layers. CONCLUSION: Agents based on hydrogen peroxide, peracetic acid, quaternary ammonium salts, glutaraldehyde, glucoprotamine or detergents can be recommended for daily use for both disinfection and AD decontamination. However, they have variable efficiencies and should be supplemented by periodic use of strong chlorine-based disinfectants efficient also against the carcinogenic and persistent CP.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21024915
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220930112614.0
007      
ta
008      
211013s2021 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00420-021-01671-5 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33738516
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Bláhová, Lucie $u Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, RECETOX, Kamenice 753/5, Building D29, 62500, Brno, Czech Republic
245    14
$a The efficiency of antineoplastic drug contamination removal by widely used disinfectants-laboratory and hospital studies / $c L. Bláhová, J. Kuta, L. Doležalová, Š. Kozáková, T. Krovová, L. Bláha
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: Antineoplastic drugs (ADs) pose risks to healthcare staff. Surface disinfectants are used in hospitals to prevent microbial contamination but the efficiency of disinfectants to degrade ADs is not known. We studied nine disinfectants on ten ADs in the standardized laboratory and realistic in situ hospital conditions. METHODS: A survey in 43 hospitals prioritized nine most commonly used disinfections based on different ingredients. These were tested on inert stainless steel and in situ on contaminated hospital flooring. The effects against ten ADs were studied by LC-MS/MS (Cyclophosphamide CP; Ifosfamide IF; Capecitabine CAP; Sunitinib SUN; Methotrexate MET; Doxorubicin DOX; Irinotecan IRI; Paclitaxel PX; 5-Fluorouracil FU) and ICP-MS (Pt as a marker of platinum-based ADs). RESULTS: Monitoring of the floor contamination in 26 hospitals showed that the most contaminated are the outpatient clinics that suffer from a large turnover of staff and patients and have limited preventive measures. The most frequent ADs were Pt, PX, FU and CP with maxima exceeding the recommended 1 ng/cm2 limit by up to 140 times. IRI, FU, MET, DOX and SUN were efficiently removed by hydrolysis in clean water and present thus lower occupational risk. Disinfectants based on hydrogen peroxide were efficient against PX and FU (> 70% degradation) but less against other ADs, such as carcinogenic CP or IF, IRI and CAP. The most efficient were the active chlorine and peracetic acid-based products, which however release irritating toxic vapors. The innovative in situ testing of ADs previously accumulated in hospital flooring showed highly problematic removal of carcinogenic CP and showed that alcohol-based disinfectants may mobilize persistent ADs contamination from deeper floor layers. CONCLUSION: Agents based on hydrogen peroxide, peracetic acid, quaternary ammonium salts, glutaraldehyde, glucoprotamine or detergents can be recommended for daily use for both disinfection and AD decontamination. However, they have variable efficiencies and should be supplemented by periodic use of strong chlorine-based disinfectants efficient also against the carcinogenic and persistent CP.
650    12
$a protinádorové látky $7 D000970
650    _2
$a dekontaminace $x metody $7 D003666
650    _2
$a detergenty $7 D003902
650    _2
$a diaminy $7 D003959
650    12
$a dezinficiencia $7 D004202
650    _2
$a kontaminace zdravotnického vybavení $7 D004866
650    _2
$a podlahy a podlahové krytiny $7 D005430
650    _2
$a glutaraldehyd $7 D005976
650    _2
$a nemocnice $7 D006761
650    _2
$a peroxid vodíku $7 D006861
650    _2
$a laboratoře $7 D007753
650    _2
$a kyselina peroctová $7 D010463
650    _2
$a pyrrolidinony $7 D011760
650    _2
$a kvartérní amoniové sloučeniny $7 D000644
650    _2
$a nerezavějící ocel $7 D013193
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Kuta, Jan $u Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, RECETOX, Kamenice 753/5, Building D29, 62500, Brno, Czech Republic $7 mub20181018241
700    1_
$a Doležalová, Lenka $u Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Žlutý kopec 7, 65653, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kozáková, Šárka $u Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Žlutý kopec 7, 65653, Brno, Czech Republic $u University Hospital Brno, Jihlavská 20, 62500, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Hojdarová, Tereza, $u Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, RECETOX, Kamenice 753/5, Building D29, 62500, Brno, Czech Republic $d 1994- $7 xx0277148
700    1_
$a Bláha, Luděk $u Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, RECETOX, Kamenice 753/5, Building D29, 62500, Brno, Czech Republic. blaha@recetox.muni.cz
773    0_
$w MED00009876 $t International archives of occupational and environmental health $x 1432-1246 $g Roč. 94, č. 7 (2021), s. 1687-1702
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33738516 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20211013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220930112607 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1714111 $s 1145422
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 94 $c 7 $d 1687-1702 $e 20210318 $i 1432-1246 $m International archives of occupational and environmental health $n Int Arch Occup Environ Health $x MED00009876
GRA    __
$a NV18-09-00188 $p Agentura Pro Zdravotnický Výzkum České Republiky
GRA    __
$a LM2018121 $p Ministerstvo Školství, Mládeže a Tělovýchovy
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20211013

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace