-
Something wrong with this record ?
Correlation of protection against varicella in a randomized Phase III varicella-containing vaccine efficacy trial in healthy infants
MA. Habib, R. Prymula, S. Carryn, S. Esposito, O. Henry, S. Ravault, V. Usonis, J. Wysocki, P. Gillard, M. Povey
Language English Country Netherlands
Document type Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 2002-01-01 to 2 months ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2002-01-01 to 2 months ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2002-01-01 to 2 months ago
Family Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2002-01-01 to 2 months ago
Health Management Database (ProQuest)
from 2002-01-01 to 2 months ago
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2002-01-01 to 2 months ago
- MeSH
- Child MeSH
- Infant MeSH
- Vaccines, Combined MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Chickenpox * prevention & control MeSH
- Antibodies, Viral MeSH
- Measles * MeSH
- Chickenpox Vaccine MeSH
- Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine MeSH
- Herpesvirus 3, Human MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Infant MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial, Phase III MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Geographicals
- Europe MeSH
BACKGROUND: Varicella vaccination confers high and long-lasting protection against chickenpox and induces robust immune responses, but an absolute correlate of protection (CoP) against varicella has not been established. This study models the relationship between varicella humoral response and protection against varicella. METHODS: This was a post-hoc analysis of data from a Phase IIIb, multicenter, randomized trial (NCT00226499) conducted in ten varicella-endemic European countries. Healthy children aged 12-22 months were randomized 3:3:1 to receive one dose of measles-mumps-rubella and one dose of varicella vaccine (one-dose group) or two doses of measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine (two-dose group) or two doses of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (control group) six weeks apart. The study remained observer-blind until completion, except in countries with obligatory additional immunizations. The objective was to correlate varicella-specific antibody concentrations with protection against varicella and probability of varicella breakthrough, using Cox proportional hazards and Dunning and accelerated failure time statistical models. The analysis was guided by the Prentice framework to explore a CoP against varicella. RESULTS: The trial included 5803 participants, 5289 in the efficacy (2266: one-dose group, 2279: two-dose group and 744: control group) and 5235 (2248, 2245 and 742 in the same groups) in the immunogenicity cohort. The trial ended in 2016 with a median follow-up time of 9.8 years. Six weeks after vaccination with one- or two-dose varicella-containing vaccine, more than 93.0% of vaccinees were seropositive for varicella-specific antibodies. Estimated vaccine efficacy correlated positively with antibody concentrations. The fourth Prentice CoP criterion was not met, due to predicted positive vaccine efficacy in seronegative participants. Further modelling showed decreased probability of moderate to severe varicella breakthrough with increasing varicella-specific antibody concentrations (ten-year probability <0.1 for antibody concentrations ≥2-fold above the seropositivity cut-off). CONCLUSIONS: Varicella-specific antibody concentrations are a good predictor of protection, given their inverse correlation with varicella occurrence. CLINICAL TRIAL: NCT00226499.
GSK 14200 Shady Grove Road Rockville MD 20850 USA
GSK Avenue Fleming 20 1300 Wavre Belgium
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21025599
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20211026133652.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 211013s2021 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.02.074 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33736915
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Habib, Md Ahsan $u GSK, Avenue Fleming 20, 1300 Wavre, Belgium. Electronic address: ahsan.m.habib@gsk.com
- 245 10
- $a Correlation of protection against varicella in a randomized Phase III varicella-containing vaccine efficacy trial in healthy infants / $c MA. Habib, R. Prymula, S. Carryn, S. Esposito, O. Henry, S. Ravault, V. Usonis, J. Wysocki, P. Gillard, M. Povey
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Varicella vaccination confers high and long-lasting protection against chickenpox and induces robust immune responses, but an absolute correlate of protection (CoP) against varicella has not been established. This study models the relationship between varicella humoral response and protection against varicella. METHODS: This was a post-hoc analysis of data from a Phase IIIb, multicenter, randomized trial (NCT00226499) conducted in ten varicella-endemic European countries. Healthy children aged 12-22 months were randomized 3:3:1 to receive one dose of measles-mumps-rubella and one dose of varicella vaccine (one-dose group) or two doses of measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccine (two-dose group) or two doses of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (control group) six weeks apart. The study remained observer-blind until completion, except in countries with obligatory additional immunizations. The objective was to correlate varicella-specific antibody concentrations with protection against varicella and probability of varicella breakthrough, using Cox proportional hazards and Dunning and accelerated failure time statistical models. The analysis was guided by the Prentice framework to explore a CoP against varicella. RESULTS: The trial included 5803 participants, 5289 in the efficacy (2266: one-dose group, 2279: two-dose group and 744: control group) and 5235 (2248, 2245 and 742 in the same groups) in the immunogenicity cohort. The trial ended in 2016 with a median follow-up time of 9.8 years. Six weeks after vaccination with one- or two-dose varicella-containing vaccine, more than 93.0% of vaccinees were seropositive for varicella-specific antibodies. Estimated vaccine efficacy correlated positively with antibody concentrations. The fourth Prentice CoP criterion was not met, due to predicted positive vaccine efficacy in seronegative participants. Further modelling showed decreased probability of moderate to severe varicella breakthrough with increasing varicella-specific antibody concentrations (ten-year probability <0.1 for antibody concentrations ≥2-fold above the seropositivity cut-off). CONCLUSIONS: Varicella-specific antibody concentrations are a good predictor of protection, given their inverse correlation with varicella occurrence. CLINICAL TRIAL: NCT00226499.
- 650 _2
- $a protilátky virové $7 D000914
- 650 12
- $a plané neštovice $x prevence a kontrola $7 D002644
- 650 _2
- $a vakcína proti planým neštovicím $7 D019433
- 650 _2
- $a dítě $7 D002648
- 650 _2
- $a virus varicella zoster $7 D014645
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a kojenec $7 D007223
- 650 12
- $a spalničky $7 D008457
- 650 _2
- $a vakcína proti spalničkám, příušnicím a zarděnkám $7 D022542
- 650 _2
- $a kombinované vakcíny $7 D017778
- 651 _2
- $a Evropa $7 D005060
- 655 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky, fáze III $7 D017428
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Prymula, Roman $u Charles University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Social Medicine, Simkova street 870, 500 03 Hradec Kralove, Czechia. Electronic address: prymula@seznam.cz
- 700 1_
- $a Carryn, Stephane $u GSK, Rue de l'Institut 89, 1330 Rixensart, Belgium. Electronic address: stephane.x.carryn@gsk.com
- 700 1_
- $a Esposito, Susanna $u Pediatric Clinic Pietro Barilla Children's Hospital, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43126 Parma, Italy. Electronic address: susannamariaroberta.esposito@unipr.it
- 700 1_
- $a Henry, Ouzama $u GSK, 14200 Shady Grove Road, Rockville, MD 20850, USA. Electronic address: ouzama.n.henry@gsk.com
- 700 1_
- $a Ravault, Stéphanie $u GSK, Rue de l'Institut 89, 1330 Rixensart, Belgium. Electronic address: stephanie.p.ravault@gsk.com
- 700 1_
- $a Usonis, Vytautas $u Clinic of Children's Diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, M. K. Čiurlionio g. 21/27, 03101 Vilnius, Lithuania. Electronic address: vytautas.usonis@mf.vu.lt
- 700 1_
- $a Wysocki, Jacek $u Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Medical Sciences, ul. Święcickiego 6, 60-781 Poznań, Poland. Electronic address: jwysocki@ump.edu.pl
- 700 1_
- $a Gillard, Paul $u GSK, Avenue Fleming 20, 1300 Wavre, Belgium. Electronic address: paul.gillard@gsk.com
- 700 1_
- $a Povey, Michael $u GSK, Avenue Fleming 20, 1300 Wavre, Belgium. Electronic address: michael.x.povey@gsk.com
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004631 $t Vaccine $x 1873-2518 $g Roč. 39, č. 25 (2021), s. 3445-3454
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33736915 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20211013 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20211026133658 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1714582 $s 1146106
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 39 $c 25 $d 3445-3454 $e 20210316 $i 1873-2518 $m Vaccine $n Vaccine $x MED00004631
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20211013