-
Something wrong with this record ?
Titanium and Other Metal Hypersensitivity Diagnosed by MELISA® Test: Follow-Up Study
R. Vrbova, S. Podzimek, L. Himmlova, A. Roubickova, M. Janovska, T. Janatova, M. Bartos, A. Vinsu
Language English Country United States
Document type Clinical Trial, Journal Article
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 2013
PubMed Central
from 2013
Europe PubMed Central
from 2013
ProQuest Central
from 2013
Open Access Digital Library
from 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2012-12-04
Open Access Digital Library
from 2013-01-01
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost)
from 2013-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2013-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2013
Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles
from 2001
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2013
PubMed
34124241
DOI
10.1155/2021/5512091
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Hypersensitivity diagnosis MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Follow-Up Studies MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires * MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Titanium adverse effects MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial MeSH
This study is aimed at proving the clinical benefit of the MELISA® test in the minimization or complete elimination of health problems in patients with confirmed hypersensitivity to metals used for tissue replacements. A group of 305 patients aged 20-75 years with previously proven metal hypersensitivity (initial MELISA® test), mainly to titanium and then to another fifteen metals, was chosen from the database at the Institute of Dental Medicine. From these patients, a final group of 42 patients agreed to participate in the study, 35 of which were female and 7 were male. The patients completed a special questionnaire aimed at information regarding change of health status from their last visit and determining whether the results of the initial MELISA® test and recommendations based on it were beneficial for patients or not. They were clinically examined, and peripheral blood samples were taken to perform follow-up MELISA® tests. Questionnaire data was processed, and the follow-up MELISA® test results were compared with the results of the initial MELISA® tests. For statistical analysis, the Fisher's exact test and paired T-test were used. Thirty-two patients reported that they followed the recommendations based on the results of the initial MELISA® tests, and of these, 30 patients (94%) confirmed significant health improvement. Six patients did not follow the recommendation, and from these, only one patient reported an improvement in his health problems. By comparison of the initial and follow-up MELISA® test results, it can be stated that the hypersensitivity to the given metal decreased or disappeared after the therapeutic interventions performed based on the initial MELISA® test results. The evaluation of the data obtained from patients in this study confirmed a significant clinical benefit of MELISA® test.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21025610
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20211026133645.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 211013s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1155/2021/5512091 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34124241
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Vrbova, Radka $u Institute of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Prague 121 11, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Titanium and Other Metal Hypersensitivity Diagnosed by MELISA® Test: Follow-Up Study / $c R. Vrbova, S. Podzimek, L. Himmlova, A. Roubickova, M. Janovska, T. Janatova, M. Bartos, A. Vinsu
- 520 9_
- $a This study is aimed at proving the clinical benefit of the MELISA® test in the minimization or complete elimination of health problems in patients with confirmed hypersensitivity to metals used for tissue replacements. A group of 305 patients aged 20-75 years with previously proven metal hypersensitivity (initial MELISA® test), mainly to titanium and then to another fifteen metals, was chosen from the database at the Institute of Dental Medicine. From these patients, a final group of 42 patients agreed to participate in the study, 35 of which were female and 7 were male. The patients completed a special questionnaire aimed at information regarding change of health status from their last visit and determining whether the results of the initial MELISA® test and recommendations based on it were beneficial for patients or not. They were clinically examined, and peripheral blood samples were taken to perform follow-up MELISA® tests. Questionnaire data was processed, and the follow-up MELISA® test results were compared with the results of the initial MELISA® tests. For statistical analysis, the Fisher's exact test and paired T-test were used. Thirty-two patients reported that they followed the recommendations based on the results of the initial MELISA® tests, and of these, 30 patients (94%) confirmed significant health improvement. Six patients did not follow the recommendation, and from these, only one patient reported an improvement in his health problems. By comparison of the initial and follow-up MELISA® test results, it can be stated that the hypersensitivity to the given metal decreased or disappeared after the therapeutic interventions performed based on the initial MELISA® test results. The evaluation of the data obtained from patients in this study confirmed a significant clinical benefit of MELISA® test.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a následné studie $7 D005500
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a alergie $x diagnóza $7 D006967
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 12
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
- 650 _2
- $a titan $x škodlivé účinky $7 D014025
- 655 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky $7 D016430
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Podzimek, Stepan $u Institute of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Prague 121 11, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Himmlova, Lucie $u Institute of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Prague 121 11, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Roubickova, Adela $u Institute of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Prague 121 11, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Janovska, Marketa $u Institute of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Prague 121 11, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Janatova, Tatjana $u Institute of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Prague 121 11, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Bartos, Martin $u Institute of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Prague 121 11, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Vinsu, Alex $u Institute of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Prague 121 11, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00182164 $t BioMed research international $x 2314-6141 $g Roč. 2021, č. - (2021), s. 5512091
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34124241 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20211013 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20211026133651 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1714590 $s 1146117
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 2021 $c - $d 5512091 $e 20210603 $i 2314-6141 $m BioMed research international $n Biomed Res Int $x MED00182164
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20211013