• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Titanium and Other Metal Hypersensitivity Diagnosed by MELISA® Test: Follow-Up Study

R. Vrbova, S. Podzimek, L. Himmlova, A. Roubickova, M. Janovska, T. Janatova, M. Bartos, A. Vinsu

. 2021 ; 2021 (-) : 5512091. [pub] 20210603

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21025610

This study is aimed at proving the clinical benefit of the MELISA® test in the minimization or complete elimination of health problems in patients with confirmed hypersensitivity to metals used for tissue replacements. A group of 305 patients aged 20-75 years with previously proven metal hypersensitivity (initial MELISA® test), mainly to titanium and then to another fifteen metals, was chosen from the database at the Institute of Dental Medicine. From these patients, a final group of 42 patients agreed to participate in the study, 35 of which were female and 7 were male. The patients completed a special questionnaire aimed at information regarding change of health status from their last visit and determining whether the results of the initial MELISA® test and recommendations based on it were beneficial for patients or not. They were clinically examined, and peripheral blood samples were taken to perform follow-up MELISA® tests. Questionnaire data was processed, and the follow-up MELISA® test results were compared with the results of the initial MELISA® tests. For statistical analysis, the Fisher's exact test and paired T-test were used. Thirty-two patients reported that they followed the recommendations based on the results of the initial MELISA® tests, and of these, 30 patients (94%) confirmed significant health improvement. Six patients did not follow the recommendation, and from these, only one patient reported an improvement in his health problems. By comparison of the initial and follow-up MELISA® test results, it can be stated that the hypersensitivity to the given metal decreased or disappeared after the therapeutic interventions performed based on the initial MELISA® test results. The evaluation of the data obtained from patients in this study confirmed a significant clinical benefit of MELISA® test.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21025610
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20211026133645.0
007      
ta
008      
211013s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1155/2021/5512091 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34124241
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Vrbova, Radka $u Institute of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Prague 121 11, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Titanium and Other Metal Hypersensitivity Diagnosed by MELISA® Test: Follow-Up Study / $c R. Vrbova, S. Podzimek, L. Himmlova, A. Roubickova, M. Janovska, T. Janatova, M. Bartos, A. Vinsu
520    9_
$a This study is aimed at proving the clinical benefit of the MELISA® test in the minimization or complete elimination of health problems in patients with confirmed hypersensitivity to metals used for tissue replacements. A group of 305 patients aged 20-75 years with previously proven metal hypersensitivity (initial MELISA® test), mainly to titanium and then to another fifteen metals, was chosen from the database at the Institute of Dental Medicine. From these patients, a final group of 42 patients agreed to participate in the study, 35 of which were female and 7 were male. The patients completed a special questionnaire aimed at information regarding change of health status from their last visit and determining whether the results of the initial MELISA® test and recommendations based on it were beneficial for patients or not. They were clinically examined, and peripheral blood samples were taken to perform follow-up MELISA® tests. Questionnaire data was processed, and the follow-up MELISA® test results were compared with the results of the initial MELISA® tests. For statistical analysis, the Fisher's exact test and paired T-test were used. Thirty-two patients reported that they followed the recommendations based on the results of the initial MELISA® tests, and of these, 30 patients (94%) confirmed significant health improvement. Six patients did not follow the recommendation, and from these, only one patient reported an improvement in his health problems. By comparison of the initial and follow-up MELISA® test results, it can be stated that the hypersensitivity to the given metal decreased or disappeared after the therapeutic interventions performed based on the initial MELISA® test results. The evaluation of the data obtained from patients in this study confirmed a significant clinical benefit of MELISA® test.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a alergie $x diagnóza $7 D006967
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    12
$a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
650    _2
$a titan $x škodlivé účinky $7 D014025
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky $7 D016430
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Podzimek, Stepan $u Institute of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Prague 121 11, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Himmlova, Lucie $u Institute of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Prague 121 11, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Roubickova, Adela $u Institute of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Prague 121 11, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Janovska, Marketa $u Institute of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Prague 121 11, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Janatova, Tatjana $u Institute of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Prague 121 11, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Bartos, Martin $u Institute of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Prague 121 11, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Vinsu, Alex $u Institute of Dental Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital in Prague, Charles University, Prague 121 11, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00182164 $t BioMed research international $x 2314-6141 $g Roč. 2021, č. - (2021), s. 5512091
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34124241 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20211013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20211026133651 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1714590 $s 1146117
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 2021 $c - $d 5512091 $e 20210603 $i 2314-6141 $m BioMed research international $n Biomed Res Int $x MED00182164
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20211013

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...