-
Something wrong with this record ?
Measuring psychological capital: Revision of the Compound Psychological Capital Scale (CPC-12)
L. Dudasova, J. Prochazka, M. Vaculik, T. Lorenz
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2006
Free Medical Journals
from 2006
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
from 2006
PubMed Central
from 2006
Europe PubMed Central
from 2006
ProQuest Central
from 2006-12-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-10-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2008-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2006
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Psychometrics * MeSH
- School Teachers psychology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
This article provides information about the psychometric limitations of the original Compound Psychological Capital Scale (CPC-12) and suggests a revised version CPC-12R, a free-to-use measure of Psychological Capital. The investigation consisted of three studies: two of these identified psychometric limitations of the original scale, and the third presented the revised version of the scale. The first study did not confirm the hypothesized four-factor structure of the CPC-12 on a sample of Czech teachers (n = 282) and found psychometric limitations in the resilience subscale. The second study identified the same problem using secondary analyses of the original data from two samples of German employees (n = 202 and 321 respectively). The third study proposed a revised version of the scale with new items for resilience, and provided support for reliability and factorial validity of the new CPC-12R on a sample of Czech employees (n = 333). CPC-12R demonstrated a better fit to the theoretically supported model of Psychological Capital than CPC-12, and further displays adequate psychometric properties to be recommended for application in both research and practice.
Department of Psychology Faculty of Social Studies Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Department of Psychology Medical School Berlin Berlin Germany
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21025983
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20211026133324.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 211013s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1371/journal.pone.0247114 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33657134
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Dudasova, Ludmila $u Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Measuring psychological capital: Revision of the Compound Psychological Capital Scale (CPC-12) / $c L. Dudasova, J. Prochazka, M. Vaculik, T. Lorenz
- 520 9_
- $a This article provides information about the psychometric limitations of the original Compound Psychological Capital Scale (CPC-12) and suggests a revised version CPC-12R, a free-to-use measure of Psychological Capital. The investigation consisted of three studies: two of these identified psychometric limitations of the original scale, and the third presented the revised version of the scale. The first study did not confirm the hypothesized four-factor structure of the CPC-12 on a sample of Czech teachers (n = 282) and found psychometric limitations in the resilience subscale. The second study identified the same problem using secondary analyses of the original data from two samples of German employees (n = 202 and 321 respectively). The third study proposed a revised version of the scale with new items for resilience, and provided support for reliability and factorial validity of the new CPC-12R on a sample of Czech employees (n = 333). CPC-12R demonstrated a better fit to the theoretically supported model of Psychological Capital than CPC-12, and further displays adequate psychometric properties to be recommended for application in both research and practice.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 12
- $a psychometrie $7 D011594
- 650 _2
- $a učitelé $x psychologie $7 D000070777
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Prochazka, Jakub $u Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic $u Department of Corporate Economy, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Vaculik, Martin $u Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Lorenz, Timo $u Department of Psychology, Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 16, č. 3 (2021), s. e0247114
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33657134 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20211013 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20211026133330 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1714864 $s 1146490
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 16 $c 3 $d e0247114 $e 20210303 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20211013