-
Something wrong with this record ?
Changes of anatomical nomenclature must be deliberate: The female external genitalia
D. Kachlik
Language English Country United States
Document type Historical Article, Journal Article
PubMed
32805060
DOI
10.1002/ca.23672
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Anatomy history MeSH
- History, 18th Century MeSH
- History, 19th Century MeSH
- History, 20th Century MeSH
- History, 21st Century MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Terminology as Topic * MeSH
- Genitalia, Female anatomy & histology MeSH
- Check Tag
- History, 18th Century MeSH
- History, 19th Century MeSH
- History, 20th Century MeSH
- History, 21st Century MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Historical Article MeSH
Anatomical terminology is a cornerstone of medical terminology and since 1895 there has been a norm (nomenclature), regularly revised, extended, and updated. The latest official version issued by the Federative International Program on Anatomical Terminology was approved by the International Federation of Associations of Anatomists in 1998 as Terminologia Anatomica (TA). Second edition of the TA (TA2) has now been prepared for approval. Each change must be meticulously discussed and considered as it affects and influences not only anatomists but also all clinicians, physicians, scientists, teachers, and students in medical fields. There are several reasons for direct and deliberate changes, but also reasons for rejection of changes that could lead to disintegration and rejection of the nomenclature revision by the expert population. The latter reasons comprise changes of terms with originally different (inappropriate/incorrect/erroneous) meanings or with originally potentially vulgar meanings that are nowadays perceived as neutral. Some examples and explanations concerning the names of the principal structures of the female external genitalia (vulva, cunnus, pudendum, labia pudenda, rima pudendi, clitoris, and perineum) and some internal ones (vagina, uterus) in Latin and Greek are given. An overview is presented of the development and frequency of their usage, mainly in ancient times but also in medieval and later texts. It is suggested that the above-stated reasons provide no fundamental argument for changing the terminology, as all the Latin terms used in TA are nowadays considered neutral.
Department of Anatomy 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Health Care Studies College of Polytechnics Jihlava Jihlava Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21025999
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20211026133313.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 211013s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/ca.23672 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32805060
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Kachlik, David $u Department of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Health Care Studies, College of Polytechnics Jihlava, Jihlava, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Changes of anatomical nomenclature must be deliberate: The female external genitalia / $c D. Kachlik
- 520 9_
- $a Anatomical terminology is a cornerstone of medical terminology and since 1895 there has been a norm (nomenclature), regularly revised, extended, and updated. The latest official version issued by the Federative International Program on Anatomical Terminology was approved by the International Federation of Associations of Anatomists in 1998 as Terminologia Anatomica (TA). Second edition of the TA (TA2) has now been prepared for approval. Each change must be meticulously discussed and considered as it affects and influences not only anatomists but also all clinicians, physicians, scientists, teachers, and students in medical fields. There are several reasons for direct and deliberate changes, but also reasons for rejection of changes that could lead to disintegration and rejection of the nomenclature revision by the expert population. The latter reasons comprise changes of terms with originally different (inappropriate/incorrect/erroneous) meanings or with originally potentially vulgar meanings that are nowadays perceived as neutral. Some examples and explanations concerning the names of the principal structures of the female external genitalia (vulva, cunnus, pudendum, labia pudenda, rima pudendi, clitoris, and perineum) and some internal ones (vagina, uterus) in Latin and Greek are given. An overview is presented of the development and frequency of their usage, mainly in ancient times but also in medieval and later texts. It is suggested that the above-stated reasons provide no fundamental argument for changing the terminology, as all the Latin terms used in TA are nowadays considered neutral.
- 650 _2
- $a anatomie $x dějiny $7 D000715
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlavní orgány $x anatomie a histologie $7 D005836
- 650 _2
- $a dějiny 18. století $7 D049671
- 650 _2
- $a dějiny 19. století $7 D049672
- 650 _2
- $a dějiny 20. století $7 D049673
- 650 _2
- $a dějiny 21. století $7 D049674
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a terminologie jako téma $7 D009626
- 655 _2
- $a historické články $7 D016456
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001107 $t Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) $x 1098-2353 $g Roč. 34, č. 2 (2021), s. 320-323
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32805060 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20211013 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20211026133319 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1714877 $s 1146506
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 34 $c 2 $d 320-323 $e 20200909 $i 1098-2353 $m Clinical anatomy $n Clin Anat $x MED00001107
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20211013