Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Changes of anatomical nomenclature must be deliberate: The female external genitalia

D. Kachlik

. 2021 ; 34 (2) : 320-323. [pub] 20200909

Language English Country United States

Document type Historical Article, Journal Article

Anatomical terminology is a cornerstone of medical terminology and since 1895 there has been a norm (nomenclature), regularly revised, extended, and updated. The latest official version issued by the Federative International Program on Anatomical Terminology was approved by the International Federation of Associations of Anatomists in 1998 as Terminologia Anatomica (TA). Second edition of the TA (TA2) has now been prepared for approval. Each change must be meticulously discussed and considered as it affects and influences not only anatomists but also all clinicians, physicians, scientists, teachers, and students in medical fields. There are several reasons for direct and deliberate changes, but also reasons for rejection of changes that could lead to disintegration and rejection of the nomenclature revision by the expert population. The latter reasons comprise changes of terms with originally different (inappropriate/incorrect/erroneous) meanings or with originally potentially vulgar meanings that are nowadays perceived as neutral. Some examples and explanations concerning the names of the principal structures of the female external genitalia (vulva, cunnus, pudendum, labia pudenda, rima pudendi, clitoris, and perineum) and some internal ones (vagina, uterus) in Latin and Greek are given. An overview is presented of the development and frequency of their usage, mainly in ancient times but also in medieval and later texts. It is suggested that the above-stated reasons provide no fundamental argument for changing the terminology, as all the Latin terms used in TA are nowadays considered neutral.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21025999
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20211026133313.0
007      
ta
008      
211013s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/ca.23672 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32805060
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Kachlik, David $u Department of Anatomy, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Health Care Studies, College of Polytechnics Jihlava, Jihlava, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Changes of anatomical nomenclature must be deliberate: The female external genitalia / $c D. Kachlik
520    9_
$a Anatomical terminology is a cornerstone of medical terminology and since 1895 there has been a norm (nomenclature), regularly revised, extended, and updated. The latest official version issued by the Federative International Program on Anatomical Terminology was approved by the International Federation of Associations of Anatomists in 1998 as Terminologia Anatomica (TA). Second edition of the TA (TA2) has now been prepared for approval. Each change must be meticulously discussed and considered as it affects and influences not only anatomists but also all clinicians, physicians, scientists, teachers, and students in medical fields. There are several reasons for direct and deliberate changes, but also reasons for rejection of changes that could lead to disintegration and rejection of the nomenclature revision by the expert population. The latter reasons comprise changes of terms with originally different (inappropriate/incorrect/erroneous) meanings or with originally potentially vulgar meanings that are nowadays perceived as neutral. Some examples and explanations concerning the names of the principal structures of the female external genitalia (vulva, cunnus, pudendum, labia pudenda, rima pudendi, clitoris, and perineum) and some internal ones (vagina, uterus) in Latin and Greek are given. An overview is presented of the development and frequency of their usage, mainly in ancient times but also in medieval and later texts. It is suggested that the above-stated reasons provide no fundamental argument for changing the terminology, as all the Latin terms used in TA are nowadays considered neutral.
650    _2
$a anatomie $x dějiny $7 D000715
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a ženské pohlavní orgány $x anatomie a histologie $7 D005836
650    _2
$a dějiny 18. století $7 D049671
650    _2
$a dějiny 19. století $7 D049672
650    _2
$a dějiny 20. století $7 D049673
650    _2
$a dějiny 21. století $7 D049674
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a terminologie jako téma $7 D009626
655    _2
$a historické články $7 D016456
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
773    0_
$w MED00001107 $t Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) $x 1098-2353 $g Roč. 34, č. 2 (2021), s. 320-323
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32805060 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20211013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20211026133319 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1714877 $s 1146506
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 34 $c 2 $d 320-323 $e 20200909 $i 1098-2353 $m Clinical anatomy $n Clin Anat $x MED00001107
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20211013

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...