-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
The value and limitations of urothelial bladder carcinoma molecular classifications to predict oncological outcomes and cancer treatment response: A systematic review and meta-analysis
M. Kardoust Parizi, V. Margulis, E. Compe Rat, SF. Shariat
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, metaanalýza, systematický přehled
- MeSH
- karcinom z přechodných buněk klasifikace genetika mortalita MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- míra přežití MeSH
- nádory močového měchýře klasifikace genetika mortalita MeSH
- prediktivní hodnota testů MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- metaanalýza MeSH
- systematický přehled MeSH
AIM: To evaluate the predictive value of molecular subtypes on oncological outcomes and response to cancer treatment in patients with urothelial bladder carcinoma (UBC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search using PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was conducted on April 2020 to identify relevant studies according to the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis guidelines. The pooled overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and progression-free survival were calculated using a fixed or random effects model. RESULTS: We identified 66 studies (including 21,447 molecular subtype records) evaluating the impact of molecular classification on oncologic outcomes in patients with UBC. We found significant association of different molecular subtypes with OS, CSS, progression-free survival, recurrence-free survival, and response to treatment. Totally, 11 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Basal group and NE-like subtypes were associated with worse OS (pooled HR: 1.78, 95%CI: 1.49-2.12, and pooled HR: 2.67, 95%CI: 1.08-6.60, respectively) in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. Luminal group was also associated with worse CSS (pooled HR of 3.67, 95%CI: 2.19-6.14). CONCLUSIONS: Based on these data, UBC molecular classifications are significant predictors of oncological outcomes and identify patients who are most likely to benefit from intensified or different therapies. The optimal consensus on molecular classification remains to be verified in well-designed prospective studies to allow precise prognostic and predictive value assessment.
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prag Czech Republic
Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology Shariati Hospital Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX
Departments of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY
European Association of Urology Research Foundation Arnhem Netherlands
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21026318
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20211026133009.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 211013s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.08.023 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32900624
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Kardoust Parizi, Mehdi $u Department of Urology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 245 14
- $a The value and limitations of urothelial bladder carcinoma molecular classifications to predict oncological outcomes and cancer treatment response: A systematic review and meta-analysis / $c M. Kardoust Parizi, V. Margulis, E. Compe Rat, SF. Shariat
- 520 9_
- $a AIM: To evaluate the predictive value of molecular subtypes on oncological outcomes and response to cancer treatment in patients with urothelial bladder carcinoma (UBC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search using PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was conducted on April 2020 to identify relevant studies according to the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis guidelines. The pooled overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and progression-free survival were calculated using a fixed or random effects model. RESULTS: We identified 66 studies (including 21,447 molecular subtype records) evaluating the impact of molecular classification on oncologic outcomes in patients with UBC. We found significant association of different molecular subtypes with OS, CSS, progression-free survival, recurrence-free survival, and response to treatment. Totally, 11 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Basal group and NE-like subtypes were associated with worse OS (pooled HR: 1.78, 95%CI: 1.49-2.12, and pooled HR: 2.67, 95%CI: 1.08-6.60, respectively) in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. Luminal group was also associated with worse CSS (pooled HR of 3.67, 95%CI: 2.19-6.14). CONCLUSIONS: Based on these data, UBC molecular classifications are significant predictors of oncological outcomes and identify patients who are most likely to benefit from intensified or different therapies. The optimal consensus on molecular classification remains to be verified in well-designed prospective studies to allow precise prognostic and predictive value assessment.
- 650 _2
- $a karcinom z přechodných buněk $x klasifikace $x genetika $x mortalita $7 D002295
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
- 650 _2
- $a míra přežití $7 D015996
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a nádory močového měchýře $x klasifikace $x genetika $x mortalita $7 D001749
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a metaanalýza $7 D017418
- 655 _2
- $a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
- 700 1_
- $a Margulis, Vitaly $u Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
- 700 1_
- $a Compe Rat, Eva $u Department of Pathology, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, UPMC Paris VI, Paris, France
- 700 1_
- $a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prag, Czech Republic; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, Netherlands. Electronic address: sfshariat@gmail.com
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008671 $t Urologic oncology $x 1873-2496 $g Roč. 39, č. 1 (2021), s. 15-33
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32900624 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20211013 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20211026133015 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1715134 $s 1146825
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 39 $c 1 $d 15-33 $e 20200906 $i 1873-2496 $m Urologic oncology $n Urol Oncol $x MED00008671
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20211013