Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

ABCDE cognitive aid tool in patient assessment - development and validation in a multicenter pilot simulation study

D. Peran, J. Kodet, J. Pekara, L. Mala, A. Truhlar, PC. Cmorej, KG. Lauridsen, F. Sari, R. Sykora

. 2020 ; 20 (1) : 95. [pub] 20201204

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, validační studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21026338

BACKGROUND: The so called ABCDE approach (Airway-Breathing-Circulation-Disability-Exposure) is a golden standard of patient assessment. The efficacy of using cognitive aids (CA) in resuscitation and peri-arrest situations remains an important knowledge gap. This work aims to develop an ABCDE CA tool (CAT) and study its potential benefits in patient condition assessment. METHODS: The development of the ABCDE CAT was done by 3 rounds of modified Delphi method performed by the members of the Advanced Life Support Science and Education Committee of the European Resuscitation Council. A pilot multicentre study on 48 paramedic students performing patient assessment in pre-post cohorts (without and with the ABCDA CAT) was made in order to validate and evaluate the impact of the tool in simulated clinical scenarios. The cumulative number and proper order of steps in clinical assessment in simulated scenarios were recorded and the time of the assessment was measured. RESULTS: The Delphi method resulted in the ABCDE CAT. The use of ABCDE CAT was associated with more performed assessment steps (804: 868; OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.35, p = 0.023) which were significantly more frequently performed in proper order (220: 338; OR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.40 to 2.02, p < 0.0001). The use of ABCDE CAT did not prolong the time of patient assessment. CONCLUSION: The cognitive aid for ABCDE assessment was developed. The use of this cognitive aid for ABCDE helps paramedics to perform more procedures, more frequently in the right order and did not prolong the patient assessment in advanced life support and peri-arrest care.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21026338
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20211026132959.0
007      
ta
008      
211013s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12873-020-00390-3 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33276731
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Peran, David $u Prague Emergency Medical Services, Prague, Czech Republic. david.peran@seznam.cz $u Division of Public Health, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. david.peran@seznam.cz $u Secondary Nursing School and Nursing College in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. david.peran@seznam.cz $u Medical College, Prague, Czech Republic. david.peran@seznam.cz
245    10
$a ABCDE cognitive aid tool in patient assessment - development and validation in a multicenter pilot simulation study / $c D. Peran, J. Kodet, J. Pekara, L. Mala, A. Truhlar, PC. Cmorej, KG. Lauridsen, F. Sari, R. Sykora
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The so called ABCDE approach (Airway-Breathing-Circulation-Disability-Exposure) is a golden standard of patient assessment. The efficacy of using cognitive aids (CA) in resuscitation and peri-arrest situations remains an important knowledge gap. This work aims to develop an ABCDE CA tool (CAT) and study its potential benefits in patient condition assessment. METHODS: The development of the ABCDE CAT was done by 3 rounds of modified Delphi method performed by the members of the Advanced Life Support Science and Education Committee of the European Resuscitation Council. A pilot multicentre study on 48 paramedic students performing patient assessment in pre-post cohorts (without and with the ABCDA CAT) was made in order to validate and evaluate the impact of the tool in simulated clinical scenarios. The cumulative number and proper order of steps in clinical assessment in simulated scenarios were recorded and the time of the assessment was measured. RESULTS: The Delphi method resulted in the ABCDE CAT. The use of ABCDE CAT was associated with more performed assessment steps (804: 868; OR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.35, p = 0.023) which were significantly more frequently performed in proper order (220: 338; OR = 1.68, 95% CI: 1.40 to 2.02, p < 0.0001). The use of ABCDE CAT did not prolong the time of patient assessment. CONCLUSION: The cognitive aid for ABCDE assessment was developed. The use of this cognitive aid for ABCDE helps paramedics to perform more procedures, more frequently in the right order and did not prolong the patient assessment in advanced life support and peri-arrest care.
650    _2
$a pomocný zdravotnický personál $x výchova $7 D000488
650    _2
$a kontrolní seznam $x normy $7 D057189
650    12
$a kognice $7 D003071
650    _2
$a kurikulum $7 D003479
650    _2
$a delfská metoda $7 D003697
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a směrnice jako téma $7 D017408
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a resuscitační péče $x normy $7 D008020
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a osoby simulující pacienta ve výuce $7 D016544
650    _2
$a pilotní projekty $7 D010865
650    _2
$a třídění pacientů $x normy $7 D014218
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a validační studie $7 D023361
700    1_
$a Kodet, Jiri $u Prague Emergency Medical Services, Prague, Czech Republic $u Emergency Department, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Pekara, Jaroslav $u Prague Emergency Medical Services, Prague, Czech Republic $u Medical College, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Mala, Lucie $u Secondary Nursing School and Nursing College in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Truhlar, Anatolij $u Emergency Medical Services of the Hradec Kralove Region, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University in Prague, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Cmorej, Patrik Christian $u Emergency Medical Services of the Usti nad Labem Region, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic $u Faculty of Health Studies, Jan Evangelista Purkyne University, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Lauridsen, Kasper Glerup $u Department of Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, USA $u Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark $u Department of Internal Medicine, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
700    1_
$a Sari, Ferenc $u Emergency Department, Skellefteå District General Hospital, Skellefteå, Sweden
700    1_
$a Sykora, Roman $u Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, 3rd Faculty of Medicine CU and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Emergency Medical Services of Karlovy Vary Region, Karlovy Vary, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00006825 $t BMC emergency medicine $x 1471-227X $g Roč. 20, č. 1 (2020), s. 95
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33276731 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20211013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20211026133005 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1715146 $s 1146845
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 20 $c 1 $d 95 $e 20201204 $i 1471-227X $m BMC emergency medicine $n BMC Emerg Med $x MED00006825
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20211013

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace