-
Something wrong with this record ?
How being synanthropic affects the gut bacteriome and mycobiome: comparison of two mouse species with contrasting ecologies
B. Bendová, J. Piálek, Ľ. Ďureje, L. Schmiedová, D. Čížková, JF. Martin, J. Kreisinger
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
18-17796Y
Grantová Agentura České Republiky - International
1501218
Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova (CZ) - International
NLK
BioMedCentral
from 2001-12-01
BioMedCentral Open Access
from 2001
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2001
Free Medical Journals
from 2001
PubMed Central
from 2001
Europe PubMed Central
from 2001
ProQuest Central
from 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2001-02-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2001-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2001
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
from 2001-12-01
- MeSH
- Bacteria classification genetics isolation & purification MeSH
- Ecology MeSH
- Feces microbiology MeSH
- Phylogeny MeSH
- Fungi classification genetics isolation & purification MeSH
- Microbiota MeSH
- Mycobiome MeSH
- Mice MeSH
- DNA, Ribosomal genetics MeSH
- RNA, Ribosomal, 16S genetics MeSH
- Sequence Analysis, DNA methods MeSH
- High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Mice MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
BACKGROUND: The vertebrate gastrointestinal tract is colonised by microbiota that have a major effect on the host's health, physiology and phenotype. Once introduced into captivity, however, the gut microbial composition of free-living individuals can change dramatically. At present, little is known about gut microbial changes associated with adaptation to a synanthropic lifestyle in commensal species, compared with their non-commensal counterparts. Here, we compare the taxonomic composition and diversity of bacterial and fungal communities across three gut sections in synanthropic house mouse (Mus musculus) and a closely related non-synanthropic mound-building mouse (Mus spicilegus). RESULTS: Using Illumina sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA amplicons, we found higher bacterial diversity in M. spicilegus and detected 11 bacterial operational taxonomic units with significantly different proportions. Notably, abundance of Oscillospira, which is typically higher in lean or outdoor pasturing animals, was more abundant in non-commensal M. spicilegus. ITS2-based barcoding revealed low diversity and high uniformity of gut fungi in both species, with the genus Kazachstania clearly dominant. CONCLUSIONS: Though differences in gut bacteria observed in the two species can be associated with their close association with humans, changes due to a move from commensalism to captivity would appear to have caused larger shifts in microbiota.
CBGP Montpellier SupAgro INRA CIRAD IRD Univ Montpellier Montferrier sur Lez France
Department of Zoology Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21026646
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20211026132724.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 211013s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s12866-020-01859-8 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32631223
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Bendová, Barbora $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Studenec Research Facility, Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a How being synanthropic affects the gut bacteriome and mycobiome: comparison of two mouse species with contrasting ecologies / $c B. Bendová, J. Piálek, Ľ. Ďureje, L. Schmiedová, D. Čížková, JF. Martin, J. Kreisinger
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The vertebrate gastrointestinal tract is colonised by microbiota that have a major effect on the host's health, physiology and phenotype. Once introduced into captivity, however, the gut microbial composition of free-living individuals can change dramatically. At present, little is known about gut microbial changes associated with adaptation to a synanthropic lifestyle in commensal species, compared with their non-commensal counterparts. Here, we compare the taxonomic composition and diversity of bacterial and fungal communities across three gut sections in synanthropic house mouse (Mus musculus) and a closely related non-synanthropic mound-building mouse (Mus spicilegus). RESULTS: Using Illumina sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA amplicons, we found higher bacterial diversity in M. spicilegus and detected 11 bacterial operational taxonomic units with significantly different proportions. Notably, abundance of Oscillospira, which is typically higher in lean or outdoor pasturing animals, was more abundant in non-commensal M. spicilegus. ITS2-based barcoding revealed low diversity and high uniformity of gut fungi in both species, with the genus Kazachstania clearly dominant. CONCLUSIONS: Though differences in gut bacteria observed in the two species can be associated with their close association with humans, changes due to a move from commensalism to captivity would appear to have caused larger shifts in microbiota.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a Bacteria $x klasifikace $x genetika $x izolace a purifikace $7 D001419
- 650 _2
- $a ribozomální DNA $x genetika $7 D004275
- 650 _2
- $a ekologie $7 D004463
- 650 _2
- $a feces $x mikrobiologie $7 D005243
- 650 _2
- $a houby $x klasifikace $x genetika $x izolace a purifikace $7 D005658
- 650 _2
- $a vysoce účinné nukleotidové sekvenování $7 D059014
- 650 _2
- $a myši $7 D051379
- 650 _2
- $a mikrobiota $7 D064307
- 650 _2
- $a mykobiom $7 D000072761
- 650 _2
- $a fylogeneze $7 D010802
- 650 _2
- $a RNA ribozomální 16S $x genetika $7 D012336
- 650 _2
- $a sekvenční analýza DNA $x metody $7 D017422
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Piálek, Jaroslav $u Studenec Research Facility, Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Ďureje, Ľudovít $u Studenec Research Facility, Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Schmiedová, Lucie $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Studenec Research Facility, Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Čížková, Dagmar $u Studenec Research Facility, Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Martin, Jean-Francois $u CBGP, Montpellier SupAgro, INRA, CIRAD, IRD, Univ Montpellier, Montferrier-sur-Lez, France
- 700 1_
- $a Kreisinger, Jakub $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. jakubkreisinger@seznam.cz
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008191 $t BMC microbiology $x 1471-2180 $g Roč. 20, č. 1 (2020), s. 194
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32631223 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20211013 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20211026132730 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1715397 $s 1147153
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 20 $c 1 $d 194 $e 20200706 $i 1471-2180 $m BMC microbiology $n BMC Microbiol $x MED00008191
- GRA __
- $a 18-17796Y $p Grantová Agentura České Republiky $2 International
- GRA __
- $a 1501218 $p Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova (CZ) $2 International
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20211013