Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

How being synanthropic affects the gut bacteriome and mycobiome: comparison of two mouse species with contrasting ecologies

B. Bendová, J. Piálek, Ľ. Ďureje, L. Schmiedová, D. Čížková, JF. Martin, J. Kreisinger

. 2020 ; 20 (1) : 194. [pub] 20200706

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc21026646

Grantová podpora
18-17796Y Grantová Agentura České Republiky - International
1501218 Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova (CZ) - International

BACKGROUND: The vertebrate gastrointestinal tract is colonised by microbiota that have a major effect on the host's health, physiology and phenotype. Once introduced into captivity, however, the gut microbial composition of free-living individuals can change dramatically. At present, little is known about gut microbial changes associated with adaptation to a synanthropic lifestyle in commensal species, compared with their non-commensal counterparts. Here, we compare the taxonomic composition and diversity of bacterial and fungal communities across three gut sections in synanthropic house mouse (Mus musculus) and a closely related non-synanthropic mound-building mouse (Mus spicilegus). RESULTS: Using Illumina sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA amplicons, we found higher bacterial diversity in M. spicilegus and detected 11 bacterial operational taxonomic units with significantly different proportions. Notably, abundance of Oscillospira, which is typically higher in lean or outdoor pasturing animals, was more abundant in non-commensal M. spicilegus. ITS2-based barcoding revealed low diversity and high uniformity of gut fungi in both species, with the genus Kazachstania clearly dominant. CONCLUSIONS: Though differences in gut bacteria observed in the two species can be associated with their close association with humans, changes due to a move from commensalism to captivity would appear to have caused larger shifts in microbiota.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc21026646
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20211026132724.0
007      
ta
008      
211013s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12866-020-01859-8 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32631223
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Bendová, Barbora $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Studenec Research Facility, Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
245    10
$a How being synanthropic affects the gut bacteriome and mycobiome: comparison of two mouse species with contrasting ecologies / $c B. Bendová, J. Piálek, Ľ. Ďureje, L. Schmiedová, D. Čížková, JF. Martin, J. Kreisinger
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: The vertebrate gastrointestinal tract is colonised by microbiota that have a major effect on the host's health, physiology and phenotype. Once introduced into captivity, however, the gut microbial composition of free-living individuals can change dramatically. At present, little is known about gut microbial changes associated with adaptation to a synanthropic lifestyle in commensal species, compared with their non-commensal counterparts. Here, we compare the taxonomic composition and diversity of bacterial and fungal communities across three gut sections in synanthropic house mouse (Mus musculus) and a closely related non-synanthropic mound-building mouse (Mus spicilegus). RESULTS: Using Illumina sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA amplicons, we found higher bacterial diversity in M. spicilegus and detected 11 bacterial operational taxonomic units with significantly different proportions. Notably, abundance of Oscillospira, which is typically higher in lean or outdoor pasturing animals, was more abundant in non-commensal M. spicilegus. ITS2-based barcoding revealed low diversity and high uniformity of gut fungi in both species, with the genus Kazachstania clearly dominant. CONCLUSIONS: Though differences in gut bacteria observed in the two species can be associated with their close association with humans, changes due to a move from commensalism to captivity would appear to have caused larger shifts in microbiota.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a Bacteria $x klasifikace $x genetika $x izolace a purifikace $7 D001419
650    _2
$a ribozomální DNA $x genetika $7 D004275
650    _2
$a ekologie $7 D004463
650    _2
$a feces $x mikrobiologie $7 D005243
650    _2
$a houby $x klasifikace $x genetika $x izolace a purifikace $7 D005658
650    _2
$a vysoce účinné nukleotidové sekvenování $7 D059014
650    _2
$a myši $7 D051379
650    _2
$a mikrobiota $7 D064307
650    _2
$a mykobiom $7 D000072761
650    _2
$a fylogeneze $7 D010802
650    _2
$a RNA ribozomální 16S $x genetika $7 D012336
650    _2
$a sekvenční analýza DNA $x metody $7 D017422
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Piálek, Jaroslav $u Studenec Research Facility, Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Ďureje, Ľudovít $u Studenec Research Facility, Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Schmiedová, Lucie $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Studenec Research Facility, Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Čížková, Dagmar $u Studenec Research Facility, Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Martin, Jean-Francois $u CBGP, Montpellier SupAgro, INRA, CIRAD, IRD, Univ Montpellier, Montferrier-sur-Lez, France
700    1_
$a Kreisinger, Jakub $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. jakubkreisinger@seznam.cz
773    0_
$w MED00008191 $t BMC microbiology $x 1471-2180 $g Roč. 20, č. 1 (2020), s. 194
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32631223 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20211013 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20211026132730 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1715397 $s 1147153
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 20 $c 1 $d 194 $e 20200706 $i 1471-2180 $m BMC microbiology $n BMC Microbiol $x MED00008191
GRA    __
$a 18-17796Y $p Grantová Agentura České Republiky $2 International
GRA    __
$a 1501218 $p Grantová Agentura, Univerzita Karlova (CZ) $2 International
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20211013

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...