-
Something wrong with this record ?
Singlet oxygen phosphorescence detection in vivo identifies PDT-induced anoxia in solid tumors
S Hackbarth, W Islam, J Fang, V Subr, B Roder, T Etrych, H Maeda
Language English Country Great Britain
Grant support
NV16-28594A
MZ0
CEP Register
PubMed
30994640
DOI
10.1039/c8pp00570b
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Acrylamides chemistry pharmacology MeSH
- Photochemotherapy * MeSH
- Photosensitizing Agents chemistry pharmacology MeSH
- Hypoxia * MeSH
- Kinetics MeSH
- Luminescence MeSH
- Molecular Structure MeSH
- Mice MeSH
- Neoplasms * drug therapy metabolism MeSH
- Antineoplastic Agents chemistry pharmacology MeSH
- Singlet Oxygen * analysis metabolism MeSH
- Dose-Response Relationship, Drug MeSH
- Structure-Activity Relationship MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Mice MeSH
- Animals MeSH
Real-time surveillance of photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been desired by the research community for a long time. The impact of the treatment is encoded in the phosphorescence kinetics of its main mediator: singlet oxygen. We report successful in vivo measurements of these weak kinetics through the skin of living mice after systemic drug application. Using special high transmission optics centered around 1200, 1270 and 1340 nm, singlet oxygen phosphorescence can be clearly discriminated from other signals. N-(2-Hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide copolymers conjugated with pyropheophorbide-a exhibit highly selective accumulation in tumors. Signals of this drug in tumors were compared to those in normal tissue. In both places, the major part of the signal could be identified as arising from drug still circulating in the bloodstream. Despite high concentrations of extravasated drug in the tumors due to the EPR effect, nearly no signal could be detected from these photosensitizers in vivo, contradicting in vitro experiments. We propose that the reason for this discrepancy is oxygen depletion in tumor tissue in vivo, even at moderate (at PDT scale) illumination intensities, soon after the start of the illumination. These results underline the importance of singlet oxygen surveillance during PDT treatment.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc21029992
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220404160613.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 211215s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1039/c8pp00570b $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30994640
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Hackbarth S $u Hackbarth, Steffen . Photobiophysics, Institute of Physics, Humboldt University of Berlin, Newtonstr. 15, 12489 Berlin, Germany. hacky@physik.hu-berlin.de.
- 245 10
- $a Singlet oxygen phosphorescence detection in vivo identifies PDT-induced anoxia in solid tumors / $c S Hackbarth, W Islam, J Fang, V Subr, B Roder, T Etrych, H Maeda
- 520 9_
- $a Real-time surveillance of photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been desired by the research community for a long time. The impact of the treatment is encoded in the phosphorescence kinetics of its main mediator: singlet oxygen. We report successful in vivo measurements of these weak kinetics through the skin of living mice after systemic drug application. Using special high transmission optics centered around 1200, 1270 and 1340 nm, singlet oxygen phosphorescence can be clearly discriminated from other signals. N-(2-Hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide copolymers conjugated with pyropheophorbide-a exhibit highly selective accumulation in tumors. Signals of this drug in tumors were compared to those in normal tissue. In both places, the major part of the signal could be identified as arising from drug still circulating in the bloodstream. Despite high concentrations of extravasated drug in the tumors due to the EPR effect, nearly no signal could be detected from these photosensitizers in vivo, contradicting in vitro experiments. We propose that the reason for this discrepancy is oxygen depletion in tumor tissue in vivo, even at moderate (at PDT scale) illumination intensities, soon after the start of the illumination. These results underline the importance of singlet oxygen surveillance during PDT treatment.
- 650 02
- $a akrylamidy $x chemie $x farmakologie $7 D000178
- 650 02
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 02
- $a protinádorové látky $x chemie $x farmakologie $7 D000970
- 650 02
- $a vztah mezi dávkou a účinkem léčiva $7 D004305
- 650 12
- $a hypoxie $7 D000860
- 650 02
- $a kinetika $7 D007700
- 650 02
- $a luminiscence $7 D049449
- 650 02
- $a myši $7 D051379
- 650 02
- $a molekulární struktura $7 D015394
- 650 12
- $a nádory $x farmakoterapie $x metabolismus $7 D009369
- 650 12
- $a fotochemoterapie $7 D010778
- 650 02
- $a fotosenzibilizující látky $x chemie $x farmakologie $7 D017319
- 650 12
- $a singletový kyslík $x analýza $x metabolismus $7 D026082
- 650 02
- $a vztahy mezi strukturou a aktivitou $7 D013329
- 700 1_
- $a Islam W
- 700 1_
- $a Fang J
- 700 1_
- $a Subr V
- 700 1_
- $a Roder B
- 700 1_
- $a Etrych T
- 700 1_
- $a Maeda H
- 773 0_
- $t Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences $g Roč. 18, č. 6 (2019), s. 1304-1314 $p Photochem Photobiol Sci $x 1474-905X $w MED00169255
- 773 0_
- $p Photochem Photobiol Sci $g 18(6):1304-1314, 2019 Jun 12
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $y p $b sig $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20211215094522 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220404160611 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1735080 $s 1150549
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 18 $c 6 $d 1304-1314 $x MED00169255 $i 1474-905X $m Photochemical & photobiological sciences
- GRA __
- $a NV16-28594A $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $a 2021-granty