Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The effect of yellow mealworm larvae meal supplementation in broiler diets on meat quality

Ondřej Šťastník, Jakub Novotný, Andrea Roztočilová, Miroslav Jůzl, Markéta Piechowiczová, Petr Kouřil, Silvie Satrapová, Lubor Lacina, Libor Kalhotka, Leoš Pavlata, Eva Mrkvicová

. 2021 ; 90 (3) : 349-356.

Status minimální Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22000081

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of Tenebrio molitor larvae meal supplementation in chicken diets on the chemical composition and sensory quality of meat. The experiment was conducted on 120 Ross 308 male broilers from day 12 to day 38 of their age. Broilers were divided into three equal groups with 5 replicates per treatment. The two experimental groups received feed mixtures containing 2% (TM2; n = 40) and 5% (TM5; n = 40), respectively of yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor L.) meal. The third group (TM0; n = 40) was control, receiving 0% of mealworms in diet. The addition of mealworm meal to diets in this trial do not worsen the chemical composition or sensory characteristics of the thigh meat of broilers. The control chickens had a higher live weight (P < 0.05) compared to the experimental groups at the end of the trial. The lowest live weight and feed intake was determined in group TM2 (P < 0.05). The highest feed intake (P < 0.05) was found in the control group. The breast meat from the control group was rated better (P < 0.05) in flavour compared to the groups receiving 2% and 5% of yellow mealworms. The primary requirement for the use of any ingredient in feed is that it does not adversely affect food safety and quality. In our study, the inclusion of 2% and 5% mealworm meal in the broiler’s diet had no influence on meat quality.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

Bibliografie atd.

Literatura

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22000081
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240717101814.0
007      
cr|cn|
008      
220104s2021 xr fs 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.2754/avb202190030349 $2 doi
040    __
$a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Šťastník, Ondřej $7 ola20231182366 $u Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of AgriSciences, Department of Animal Nutrition and Forage Production, Brno, Czech Republic
245    14
$a The effect of yellow mealworm larvae meal supplementation in broiler diets on meat quality / $c Ondřej Šťastník, Jakub Novotný, Andrea Roztočilová, Miroslav Jůzl, Markéta Piechowiczová, Petr Kouřil, Silvie Satrapová, Lubor Lacina, Libor Kalhotka, Leoš Pavlata, Eva Mrkvicová
504    __
$a Literatura
520    9_
$a The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of Tenebrio molitor larvae meal supplementation in chicken diets on the chemical composition and sensory quality of meat. The experiment was conducted on 120 Ross 308 male broilers from day 12 to day 38 of their age. Broilers were divided into three equal groups with 5 replicates per treatment. The two experimental groups received feed mixtures containing 2% (TM2; n = 40) and 5% (TM5; n = 40), respectively of yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor L.) meal. The third group (TM0; n = 40) was control, receiving 0% of mealworms in diet. The addition of mealworm meal to diets in this trial do not worsen the chemical composition or sensory characteristics of the thigh meat of broilers. The control chickens had a higher live weight (P < 0.05) compared to the experimental groups at the end of the trial. The lowest live weight and feed intake was determined in group TM2 (P < 0.05). The highest feed intake (P < 0.05) was found in the control group. The breast meat from the control group was rated better (P < 0.05) in flavour compared to the groups receiving 2% and 5% of yellow mealworms. The primary requirement for the use of any ingredient in feed is that it does not adversely affect food safety and quality. In our study, the inclusion of 2% and 5% mealworm meal in the broiler’s diet had no influence on meat quality.
700    1_
$a Novotný, Jakub $7 _AN112597 $u Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of AgriSciences, Department of Animal Nutrition and Forage Production, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Roztočilová, Andrea $7 xx0320053 $u Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of AgriSciences, Department of Animal Nutrition and Forage Production, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Jůzl, Miroslav, $d 1978- $7 stk2008415757 $u Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of AgriSciences, Department of Food Technology, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Piechowiczová, Markéta $7 xx0243344 $u Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of AgriSciences, Department of Food Technology, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kouřil, Petr $7 _AN112599 $u Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of AgriSciences, Department of Agrochemistry, Soil Science, Microbiology and Plant Nutrition, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Satrapová, Silvie $7 _AN112600 $u Underground Food s.r.o, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Lacina, Lubor $7 _AN112601 $u Underground Food s.r.o, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kalhotka, Libor, $d 1976- $7 stk2008441703
700    1_
$a Pavlata, Leoš, $d 1971- $7 xx0037139 $u Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of AgriSciences, Department of Animal Nutrition and Forage Production, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Mrkvicová, Eva $7 xx0049817 $u Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of AgriSciences, Department of Animal Nutrition and Forage Production, Brno, Czech Republic
773    0_
$t Acta veterinaria Brno $x 0001-7213 $g Roč. 90, č. 3 (2021), s. 349-356 $w MED00172332
856    41
$u https://actavet.vfu.cz/archive/ $y domovská stránka časopisu
910    __
$a ABA008 $b online $y 0 $z 0
990    __
$a 20220103140209 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240717101810 $b ABA008
999    __
$a min $b bmc $g 1742440 $s 1151226
BAS    __
$a 3 $a 4
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 90 $c 3 $d 349-356 $i 0001-7213 $m Acta veterinaria Brno $x MED00172332
LZP    __
$a NLK 2021-51/kv

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...