Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The occurrence of technological damage in slaughtered cattle, pigs, sheep and goats in the Czech Republic

Petra Doleželová, Petra Mačáková, Petr Chloupek, Lenka Válková, Zbyněk Semerád, Daniela Takáčová

. 2021 ; 90 (4) : 439-451.

Status minimální Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22000124

The occurrence of technological damage in cattle, pigs, sheep and goats reared and slaughtered in the Czech Republic was monitored by evaluation and analyzing results of post mortem inspections of official veterinarians from slaughterhouses in the period from 2010 to 2019. We found that technological damage was the most common in pigs, and less common in cattle, sheep and goats. Compared to other species, pigs have statistically the highest occurrence of lung congestion (51.9%–19.3%, in the order: sows, finishing pigs, piglets), insufficient technology processing (0.200%–0.018%, in the order: sows, finishing pigs, piglets), delayed evisceration (0.04%–0.02%, in the order: finishing pigs, sows, piglets), muscle spoilage (0.033%–0.004%, in the order: piglets, finishing pigs, sows) and over-scalding (0.028%–0.013%, in the order: finishing pigs, piglets, sows). Compared to other species, cattle have statistically the highest incidence of different sensory deviations (7.42%–0.33%, in the order: calves, dairy cows, heifers, bulls) and insufficient bleeding (4.4%–2.9%, in the order: bulls, heifers, dairy cows, calves). In all monitored animal species, a similar level of the occurrence of contamination during the carcass processing was recorded (0.37%–0.00%). In sheep and goats, technological damage is generally lower than in pigs and cattle.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

Bibliografie atd.

Literatura

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22000124
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220104165728.0
007      
cr|cn|
008      
220104s2021 xr d fs 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.2754/avb202190040439 $2 doi
040    __
$a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Doleželová, Petra $7 _AN069041 $u University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, Department of Animal Protection and Welfare and Veterinary Public Health, Brno, Czech Republic
245    14
$a The occurrence of technological damage in slaughtered cattle, pigs, sheep and goats in the Czech Republic / $c Petra Doleželová, Petra Mačáková, Petr Chloupek, Lenka Válková, Zbyněk Semerád, Daniela Takáčová
504    __
$a Literatura
520    9_
$a The occurrence of technological damage in cattle, pigs, sheep and goats reared and slaughtered in the Czech Republic was monitored by evaluation and analyzing results of post mortem inspections of official veterinarians from slaughterhouses in the period from 2010 to 2019. We found that technological damage was the most common in pigs, and less common in cattle, sheep and goats. Compared to other species, pigs have statistically the highest occurrence of lung congestion (51.9%–19.3%, in the order: sows, finishing pigs, piglets), insufficient technology processing (0.200%–0.018%, in the order: sows, finishing pigs, piglets), delayed evisceration (0.04%–0.02%, in the order: finishing pigs, sows, piglets), muscle spoilage (0.033%–0.004%, in the order: piglets, finishing pigs, sows) and over-scalding (0.028%–0.013%, in the order: finishing pigs, piglets, sows). Compared to other species, cattle have statistically the highest incidence of different sensory deviations (7.42%–0.33%, in the order: calves, dairy cows, heifers, bulls) and insufficient bleeding (4.4%–2.9%, in the order: bulls, heifers, dairy cows, calves). In all monitored animal species, a similar level of the occurrence of contamination during the carcass processing was recorded (0.37%–0.00%). In sheep and goats, technological damage is generally lower than in pigs and cattle.
700    1_
$a Mačáková, Petra $7 jo20221171691 $u University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, Department of Animal Protection and Welfare and Veterinary Public Health, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Chloupek, Petr $7 xx0098119 $u University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, Department of Animal Protection and Welfare and Veterinary Public Health, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Válková, Lenka $7 _AN112618 $u University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, Department of Animal Protection and Welfare and Veterinary Public Health, Brno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Semerád, Zbyněk $7 xx0134620 $u State Veterinary Administration, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Takáčová, Daniela $7 _AN052742 $u University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice, Department of Public Veterinary Medicine and Animal Welfare, Slovak Republic
773    0_
$t Acta veterinaria Brno $x 0001-7213 $g Roč. 90, č. 4 (2021), s. 439-451 $w MED00172332
856    41
$u https://actavet.vfu.cz/archive/ $y domovská stránka časopisu
910    __
$a ABA008 $b online $y 0 $z 0
990    __
$a 20220103140209 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220104165724 $b ABA008
999    __
$a min $b bmc $g 1742474 $s 1151269
BAS    __
$a 3 $a 4
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 90 $c 4 $d 439-451 $i 0001-7213 $m Acta veterinaria Brno $x MED00172332
LZP    __
$a NLK 2021-51/kv

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...