The results of the antimicrobial susceptibility testing of clinical isolates Streptococcus suis to amoxicillin and marbofloxacin obtained by the agar dilution method and broth microdilution method with the results obtained by the commercially available E-test were compared. Comparisons between the methods based on the determination of the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the antimicrobials were assessed based on the degree and frequency of the categorical agreement (Agar dilution method as a reference system) and the percentage of the categorical agreement and error rate. A statistical evaluation was determined using the Bland-Atman method. The presented MIC values, determined for the isolates in the E-test, were slightly different from the MIC values determined by the dilution tests, mainly due to the different defined testing concentrations. For the E-test as the test system and agar-dilution method as the reference system, no error of any class was detected (very major, major and minor error) and a complete categorical agreement was obtained between the evaluated methods for amoxicillin. For amoxicillin, the regression and correlation analysis show linear relationships between the E-test and the two dilution methods with significant coefficients of determination (0.62 and 0.75). The slopes of the equality and regression lines were not significantly different. However, the E-test tends to slightly overestimate the MIC values when compared to the microdilution. The reverse is true when compared with the agar dilution. There was good agreement between the E-test and the dilution methods with a low bias (0.001 3 and −0.005 0), all the experimental data were within the computed limits of agreement. For marbofloxacin, the same trends were observed with lower coefficients of determination (0.42 and 0.73) and a less favourable agreement. The E-test constantly underestimated the MIC values when compared to the two dilution methods. No significant difference between the microdilution and agar dilution was obtained.

Ceva Santé Animale Libourne France

Derpartment of Immunology Veterinary Research Institute Brno Czech Republic

Literatura

000      

00000naa a2200000 a 4500

001      

bmc22000370

003      

CZ-PrNML

005      

20220105102132.0

007      

cr|cn|

008      

220105s2020 xr d fs 000 0|eng||

009      

AR

024    7_

$a 10.17221/111/2020-VETMED $2 doi

040    __

$a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze

041    0_

$a eng

044    __

$a xr

100    1_

$a Sperling, D. $u Ceva Santé Animale, Libourne, France

245    10

$a Examination of the minimum inhibitory concentration of amoxicillin and marbofloxacin against Streptococcus suis using standardised methods / $c D. Sperling, H. Karembe, M. Zouharova, K. Nedbalcova

504    __

$a Literatura

520    3_

$a The results of the antimicrobial susceptibility testing of clinical isolates Streptococcus suis to amoxicillin and marbofloxacin obtained by the agar dilution method and broth microdilution method with the results obtained by the commercially available E-test were compared. Comparisons between the methods based on the determination of the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the antimicrobials were assessed based on the degree and frequency of the categorical agreement (Agar dilution method as a reference system) and the percentage of the categorical agreement and error rate. A statistical evaluation was determined using the Bland-Atman method. The presented MIC values, determined for the isolates in the E-test, were slightly different from the MIC values determined by the dilution tests, mainly due to the different defined testing concentrations. For the E-test as the test system and agar-dilution method as the reference system, no error of any class was detected (very major, major and minor error) and a complete categorical agreement was obtained between the evaluated methods for amoxicillin. For amoxicillin, the regression and correlation analysis show linear relationships between the E-test and the two dilution methods with significant coefficients of determination (0.62 and 0.75). The slopes of the equality and regression lines were not significantly different. However, the E-test tends to slightly overestimate the MIC values when compared to the microdilution. The reverse is true when compared with the agar dilution. There was good agreement between the E-test and the dilution methods with a low bias (0.001 3 and −0.005 0), all the experimental data were within the computed limits of agreement. For marbofloxacin, the same trends were observed with lower coefficients of determination (0.42 and 0.73) and a less favourable agreement. The E-test constantly underestimated the MIC values when compared to the two dilution methods. No significant difference between the microdilution and agar dilution was obtained.

700    1_

$a Karembe, H. $u Ceva Santé Animale, Libourne, France

700    1_

$a Zouharová, Monika $7 xx0125664 $u Derpartment of Immunology, Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic

700    1_

$a Nedbalcová, Kateřina $7 _AN084070 $u Derpartment of Immunology, Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic

773    0_

$t Veterinární medicína $x 0375-8427 $g Roč. 65, č. 9 (2020), s. 377-386 $w MED00177041

910    __

$a ABA008 $b online $y 0 $z 0

990    __

$a 20220105100548 $b ABA008

991    __

$a 20220105102128 $b ABA008

999    __

$a min $b bmc $g 1742817 $s 1151516

BAS    __

$a 3 $a 4

BMC    __

$a 2020 $b 65 $c 9 $d 377-386 $i 0375-8427 $m Veterinární medicína $x MED00177041

LZP    __

$a NLK 2021-51/kv