-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Examination of the minimum inhibitory concentration of amoxicillin and marbofloxacin against Streptococcus suis using standardised methods
D. Sperling, H. Karembe, M. Zouharova, K. Nedbalcova
Status minimální Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2001
Free Medical Journals
od 2001
Free Medical Journals
od 2001
ProQuest Central
od 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2001
The results of the antimicrobial susceptibility testing of clinical isolates Streptococcus suis to amoxicillin and marbofloxacin obtained by the agar dilution method and broth microdilution method with the results obtained by the commercially available E-test were compared. Comparisons between the methods based on the determination of the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the antimicrobials were assessed based on the degree and frequency of the categorical agreement (Agar dilution method as a reference system) and the percentage of the categorical agreement and error rate. A statistical evaluation was determined using the Bland-Atman method. The presented MIC values, determined for the isolates in the E-test, were slightly different from the MIC values determined by the dilution tests, mainly due to the different defined testing concentrations. For the E-test as the test system and agar-dilution method as the reference system, no error of any class was detected (very major, major and minor error) and a complete categorical agreement was obtained between the evaluated methods for amoxicillin. For amoxicillin, the regression and correlation analysis show linear relationships between the E-test and the two dilution methods with significant coefficients of determination (0.62 and 0.75). The slopes of the equality and regression lines were not significantly different. However, the E-test tends to slightly overestimate the MIC values when compared to the microdilution. The reverse is true when compared with the agar dilution. There was good agreement between the E-test and the dilution methods with a low bias (0.001 3 and −0.005 0), all the experimental data were within the computed limits of agreement. For marbofloxacin, the same trends were observed with lower coefficients of determination (0.42 and 0.73) and a less favourable agreement. The E-test constantly underestimated the MIC values when compared to the two dilution methods. No significant difference between the microdilution and agar dilution was obtained.
Ceva Santé Animale Libourne France
Derpartment of Immunology Veterinary Research Institute Brno Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
Literatura
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22000370
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220105102132.0
- 007
- cr|cn|
- 008
- 220105s2020 xr d fs 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.17221/111/2020-VETMED $2 doi
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Sperling, D. $u Ceva Santé Animale, Libourne, France
- 245 10
- $a Examination of the minimum inhibitory concentration of amoxicillin and marbofloxacin against Streptococcus suis using standardised methods / $c D. Sperling, H. Karembe, M. Zouharova, K. Nedbalcova
- 504 __
- $a Literatura
- 520 3_
- $a The results of the antimicrobial susceptibility testing of clinical isolates Streptococcus suis to amoxicillin and marbofloxacin obtained by the agar dilution method and broth microdilution method with the results obtained by the commercially available E-test were compared. Comparisons between the methods based on the determination of the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the antimicrobials were assessed based on the degree and frequency of the categorical agreement (Agar dilution method as a reference system) and the percentage of the categorical agreement and error rate. A statistical evaluation was determined using the Bland-Atman method. The presented MIC values, determined for the isolates in the E-test, were slightly different from the MIC values determined by the dilution tests, mainly due to the different defined testing concentrations. For the E-test as the test system and agar-dilution method as the reference system, no error of any class was detected (very major, major and minor error) and a complete categorical agreement was obtained between the evaluated methods for amoxicillin. For amoxicillin, the regression and correlation analysis show linear relationships between the E-test and the two dilution methods with significant coefficients of determination (0.62 and 0.75). The slopes of the equality and regression lines were not significantly different. However, the E-test tends to slightly overestimate the MIC values when compared to the microdilution. The reverse is true when compared with the agar dilution. There was good agreement between the E-test and the dilution methods with a low bias (0.001 3 and −0.005 0), all the experimental data were within the computed limits of agreement. For marbofloxacin, the same trends were observed with lower coefficients of determination (0.42 and 0.73) and a less favourable agreement. The E-test constantly underestimated the MIC values when compared to the two dilution methods. No significant difference between the microdilution and agar dilution was obtained.
- 700 1_
- $a Karembe, H. $u Ceva Santé Animale, Libourne, France
- 700 1_
- $a Zouharová, Monika $7 xx0125664 $u Derpartment of Immunology, Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Nedbalcová, Kateřina $7 _AN084070 $u Derpartment of Immunology, Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $t Veterinární medicína $x 0375-8427 $g Roč. 65, č. 9 (2020), s. 377-386 $w MED00177041
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b online $y 0 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220105100548 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220105102128 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a min $b bmc $g 1742817 $s 1151516
- BAS __
- $a 3 $a 4
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 65 $c 9 $d 377-386 $i 0375-8427 $m Veterinární medicína $x MED00177041
- LZP __
- $a NLK 2021-51/kv