Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Endoparasite prevalence and infection risk factors among cats in an animal shelter in Estonia

A. Tull, E. Moks, U. Saarma

. 2021 ; 68 (-) : 1-10. [pub] 20210420

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22000806

Cats are important hosts for different zoonotic parasites that can be hazardous to human health. To date, few studies have attempted to identify the factors affecting parasitic infections in shelter animals. This study aims to analyse the presence of endoparasites in shelter cats in Tartu, Estonia, and identify factors affecting endoparasite prevalence and intensity. The risk factors considered were age, location (urban vs rural cats) and time spent in shelter. In total, 290 faecal samples were collected from cats at an animal shelter in 2015-2016 and investigated for endoparasites using the concentration flotation technique. In total, 138 shelter cats (47.6%) were infected with endoparasites and their overall prevalence was: Toxocara cati (36.6%), Cystoisospora spp. (12.4%), Taeniidae gen. sp. (4.1%), Toxoplasma gondii/Hammondia hammondi (3.4%), Eucoleus aerophilus (2.1%), Cryptosporidium spp. (2.1%), Ancylostoma sp. (0.7%) and Giardia sp. (0.7%). Coinfections occurred in 38 cats (13.1%) most frequently of T. cati and Cystoisospora spp. (4.5%), Cystoisospora spp. and T. gondii/H. hammondi (2.1%). Where species identification of cestode and nematode samples was not possible according to morphology, genetic analysis of the mitochondrial cox1 gene was carried out. DNA was successfully analysed for 6 out of 13 samples that required genetic identification, revealing Ancylostoma tubaeforme in one nematode sample and Hydatigera taeniaeformis in five cestode samples. Cats from rural areas had significantly higher endoparasite prevalence than cats from urban areas. Helminth prevalence decreased to some extent due to anthelmintic treatment in cats available for adoption (held ≥15 days in the shelter), whereas the prevalence of infection with protists increased significantly in these animals. It is important to note that the analysis revealed lower infection intensity for quarantine cats (held 1-14 days in the shelter) compared with cats available for adoption. The relatively high prevalence of endoparasites (including zoonotic) in shelter cats ready for adoption suggests that current anthelminthic procedures require improvements.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

Bibliografie atd.

Literatura

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22000806
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220202125827.0
007      
cr|cn|
008      
220114s2021 xr d fs 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.14411/fp.2021.010 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33938815
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Tull, Ants $u Department of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Estonia
245    10
$a Endoparasite prevalence and infection risk factors among cats in an animal shelter in Estonia / $c A. Tull, E. Moks, U. Saarma
504    __
$a Literatura
520    9_
$a Cats are important hosts for different zoonotic parasites that can be hazardous to human health. To date, few studies have attempted to identify the factors affecting parasitic infections in shelter animals. This study aims to analyse the presence of endoparasites in shelter cats in Tartu, Estonia, and identify factors affecting endoparasite prevalence and intensity. The risk factors considered were age, location (urban vs rural cats) and time spent in shelter. In total, 290 faecal samples were collected from cats at an animal shelter in 2015-2016 and investigated for endoparasites using the concentration flotation technique. In total, 138 shelter cats (47.6%) were infected with endoparasites and their overall prevalence was: Toxocara cati (36.6%), Cystoisospora spp. (12.4%), Taeniidae gen. sp. (4.1%), Toxoplasma gondii/Hammondia hammondi (3.4%), Eucoleus aerophilus (2.1%), Cryptosporidium spp. (2.1%), Ancylostoma sp. (0.7%) and Giardia sp. (0.7%). Coinfections occurred in 38 cats (13.1%) most frequently of T. cati and Cystoisospora spp. (4.5%), Cystoisospora spp. and T. gondii/H. hammondi (2.1%). Where species identification of cestode and nematode samples was not possible according to morphology, genetic analysis of the mitochondrial cox1 gene was carried out. DNA was successfully analysed for 6 out of 13 samples that required genetic identification, revealing Ancylostoma tubaeforme in one nematode sample and Hydatigera taeniaeformis in five cestode samples. Cats from rural areas had significantly higher endoparasite prevalence than cats from urban areas. Helminth prevalence decreased to some extent due to anthelmintic treatment in cats available for adoption (held ≥15 days in the shelter), whereas the prevalence of infection with protists increased significantly in these animals. It is important to note that the analysis revealed lower infection intensity for quarantine cats (held 1-14 days in the shelter) compared with cats available for adoption. The relatively high prevalence of endoparasites (including zoonotic) in shelter cats ready for adoption suggests that current anthelminthic procedures require improvements.
650    _2
$a věkové faktory $7 D000367
650    _2
$a Ancylostoma $x izolace a purifikace $7 D000722
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a kočky $x parazitologie $7 D002415
650    _2
$a Cestoda $x izolace a purifikace $7 D002589
650    _2
$a Coccidia $x izolace a purifikace $7 D003044
650    _2
$a Cryptosporidium $x izolace a purifikace $7 D003458
650    _2
$a respirační komplex IV $x genetika $7 D003576
650    _2
$a feces $x parazitologie $7 D005243
650    _2
$a geny helmintů $7 D017238
650    _2
$a Giardia $x izolace a purifikace $7 D005872
650    _2
$a giardiáza $7 D005873
650    _2
$a cizopasní červi $7 D006376
650    _2
$a hlístice $x izolace a purifikace $7 D009348
650    12
$a paraziti $x klasifikace $x izolace a purifikace $x patogenita $7 D010271
650    _2
$a prevalence $7 D015995
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
650    _2
$a Toxocara $x izolace a purifikace $7 D014119
650    _2
$a Toxoplasma $x izolace a purifikace $7 D014122
650    _2
$a zoonózy $x parazitologie $7 D015047
651    _2
$a Estonsko $x epidemiologie $7 D004957
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Moks, Epp $u Department of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Estonia $u Veterinary and Food Laboratory, Department of bacteriology-pathology, Tartu, Estonia
700    1_
$a Saarma, Urmas $u Department of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Estonia
773    0_
$w MED00011006 $t Folia parasitologica $x 1803-6465 $g Roč. 68, č. - (2021), s. 1-10
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33938815 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b online $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220106 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220202125817 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1755637 $s 1151952
BAS    __
$a 3 $a 4
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 68 $c - $d 1-10 $e 20210420 $i 1803-6465 $m Folia parasitologica $n Folia parasitol. $x MED00011006
LZP    __
$b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20220106

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...