• Something wrong with this record ?

Software-based Detection of Acute Rejection Changes in Face Transplant

MI. Dorante, B. Kollar, M. Bittner, A. Wang, Y. Diehm, S. Foroutanjazi, N. Parikh, V. Haug, TM. den Uyl, B. Pomahac

. 2021 ; (-) : . [pub] 20210901

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article

Grant support
United States Department of Defense under their Reconstructive Transplant Research Program W81XWH-18-1-0702

BACKGROUND:  An objective, non-invasive method for redness detection during acute allograft rejection in face transplantation (FT) is lacking. METHODS:  A retrospective cohort study was performed with 688 images of 7 patients with face transplant (range, 1 to 108 months post-transplant). Healthy controls were matched to donor age, sex, and had no prior facial procedures. Rejection state was confirmed via tissue biopsy. An image-analysis software developed alongside VicarVision (Amsterdam, Netherlands) was used to produce R, a measure of differences between detectable color and absolute red. R is inversely proportional to redness, where lower R values correspond to increased redness. Linear mixed models were used to study fixed effect of rejection state on R values. Estimated marginal means of fitted models were calculated for pairwise comparisons. RESULTS:  Of 688 images, 175, 170, 202, and 141 images were attributable to Banff Grade 0,1,2, and 3, respectively. Estimated change in R value of facial allografts decreased with increasing Banff Grade (p = 0.0001). The mean R value of clinical rejection (Banff Grade ⅔) (16.67, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 14.79-18.58) was lower (p = 0.005) than non-rejection (Banff Grade 0/1) (19.38, 95%CI 17.43-21.33). Both clinical and non-rejection mean R values were lower (p = 0.0001) than healthy controls (24.12, 95%CI 20.96-27.28). CONCLUSION:  This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that software-based analysis can detect and monitor acute rejection changes in FT. Future studies should expand on this tool's potential application in telehealth and as a screening tool for allograft rejection.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22000888
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220106132546.0
007      
ta
008      
220106s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1055/s-0041-1733995 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34470059
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Dorante, Miguel I $u Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Boston, Massachusetts $u Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center; Burlington, Massachusetts
245    10
$a Software-based Detection of Acute Rejection Changes in Face Transplant / $c MI. Dorante, B. Kollar, M. Bittner, A. Wang, Y. Diehm, S. Foroutanjazi, N. Parikh, V. Haug, TM. den Uyl, B. Pomahac
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND:  An objective, non-invasive method for redness detection during acute allograft rejection in face transplantation (FT) is lacking. METHODS:  A retrospective cohort study was performed with 688 images of 7 patients with face transplant (range, 1 to 108 months post-transplant). Healthy controls were matched to donor age, sex, and had no prior facial procedures. Rejection state was confirmed via tissue biopsy. An image-analysis software developed alongside VicarVision (Amsterdam, Netherlands) was used to produce R, a measure of differences between detectable color and absolute red. R is inversely proportional to redness, where lower R values correspond to increased redness. Linear mixed models were used to study fixed effect of rejection state on R values. Estimated marginal means of fitted models were calculated for pairwise comparisons. RESULTS:  Of 688 images, 175, 170, 202, and 141 images were attributable to Banff Grade 0,1,2, and 3, respectively. Estimated change in R value of facial allografts decreased with increasing Banff Grade (p = 0.0001). The mean R value of clinical rejection (Banff Grade ⅔) (16.67, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 14.79-18.58) was lower (p = 0.005) than non-rejection (Banff Grade 0/1) (19.38, 95%CI 17.43-21.33). Both clinical and non-rejection mean R values were lower (p = 0.0001) than healthy controls (24.12, 95%CI 20.96-27.28). CONCLUSION:  This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that software-based analysis can detect and monitor acute rejection changes in FT. Future studies should expand on this tool's potential application in telehealth and as a screening tool for allograft rejection.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Kollar, Branislav $u Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Boston, Massachusetts $u Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University of Freiburg Medical Center, Medical Faculty of the University of Freiburg; Freiburg, Germany
700    1_
$a Bittner, Marian $u VicarVision, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Wang, Alice $u Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Boston, Massachusetts
700    1_
$a Diehm, Yannick $u Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Boston, Massachusetts $u Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Microsurgery, Burn Trauma Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg; Ludwigshafen, Germany
700    1_
$a Foroutanjazi, Sina $u Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Boston, Massachusetts
700    1_
$a Parikh, Neil $u Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Boston, Massachusetts
700    1_
$a Haug, Valentin $u Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Boston, Massachusetts $u Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Microsurgery, Burn Trauma Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg; Ludwigshafen, Germany
700    1_
$a den Uyl, Tim M $u VicarVision, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
700    1_
$a Pomahač, Bohdan, $u Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School; Boston, Massachusetts $u Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale New Haven Hospital, Yale School of Medicine; New Haven, Connecticut, USA $d 1971- $7 xx0117402
773    0_
$w MED00186363 $t Journal of reconstructive microsurgery $x 1098-8947 $g č. - (2021)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34470059 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20220106 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220106132543 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1743223 $s 1152034
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $c - $e 20210901 $i 1098-8947 $m Journal of reconstructive microsurgery $n J Reconstr Microsurg $x MED00186363
GRA    __
$a United States Department of Defense under their Reconstructive Transplant Research Program $p W81XWH-18-1-0702
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220106

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...