Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Intravesical Chemohyperthermia vs. Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Instillation for Intermediate- and High-Risk Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

H. Zhao, VW. Chan, D. Castellani, EO. Chan, WLK. Ong, Q. Peng, M. Moschini, W. Krajewski, B. Pradere, CF. Ng, D. Enikeev, N. Vasdev, G. Ekin, A. Sousa, J. Leon, F. Guerrero-Ramos, WS. Tan, J. Kelly, SF. Shariat, JA. Witjes, JY. Teoh

. 2021 ; 8 (-) : 775527. [pub] 20211123

Language English Country Switzerland

Document type Systematic Review

Background: The efficacy of intravesical chemotherapy maintenance for patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is inferior compared to intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG). How intravesical chemohyperthermia (CHT) compares with BCG is under investigation. Objective: To compare the oncological outcomes and safety profile between intravesical CHT and BCG treatment for intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies comparing CHT with BCG for intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC patients. A comprehensive literature search on OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library was conducted. Risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane RoB tool and ROBINS-I. Certainty of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: A total of 2,375 articles were identified and five studies were finally included. Among them, four randomised trials comprising 327 patients (CHT group: 156 patients; BCG group: 171 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in the 24-36 months recurrence rates (CHT: 29.5%, BCG: 37.4%; RR: 0.83, 95% CI 0.61-1.13; moderate certainty of evidence) and the 24-36 months progression rates (CHT: 4.4%, BCG: 7.6%, RR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.26-1.49; low certainty of evidence). There were also no significant differences in grade 1-2 adverse events (CHT group: 59.9%, BCG group 54.5%; RR = 1.10, 95% CI 0.93-1.30; moderate certainty of evidence) and grade 3 or above adverse events (CHT group: 23.2%, BCG group 22.5%; RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.69-1.43; low certainty of evidence). Conclusions: Intravesical CHT had equivalent oncological outcomes and similar safety profile when compared to BCG maintenance therapy for patients with intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC. CHT is a possible alternative treatment in the times of BCG shortage.

Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology Wrocław Medical University Wrocław Poland

Department of Urology Charles University Prague Czechia

Department of Urology Comarcal Hospital Monforte Spain

Department of Urology Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre Lister Hospital Stevenage School of Medicine and Life Sciences University of Hertfordshire Hatfield United Kingdom

Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Department of Urology Penang General Hospital George Town Malaysia

Department of Urology Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen Netherlands

Department of Urology Royal Free Hospital London United Kingdom

Department of Urology University College London Hospital London United Kingdom

Department of Urology University Hospital 12 de Octubre Madrid Spain

Department of Urology University Hospital of Tours Tours France

Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX United States

Department of Urology Urla State Hospital Izmir Turkey

Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY United States

Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences University College London London United Kingdom

Division of Urology Department of Special Surgery Jordan University Hospital The University of Jordan Amman Jordan

Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia

Klinik für Urologie Luzerner Kantonsspital Lucerne Switzerland

S H Ho Urology Centre Department of Surgery The Chinese University of Hong Kong Shatin Hong Kong SAR China

School of Medicine Faculty of Medicine and Health University of Leeds Leeds United Kingdom

Unit of Urology Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona Polytechnic University of the Marche Region Ancona Italy

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22001247
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220112153536.0
007      
ta
008      
220107s2021 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3389/fsurg.2021.775527 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34888347
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Zhao, Hongda $u S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
245    10
$a Intravesical Chemohyperthermia vs. Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Instillation for Intermediate- and High-Risk Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis / $c H. Zhao, VW. Chan, D. Castellani, EO. Chan, WLK. Ong, Q. Peng, M. Moschini, W. Krajewski, B. Pradere, CF. Ng, D. Enikeev, N. Vasdev, G. Ekin, A. Sousa, J. Leon, F. Guerrero-Ramos, WS. Tan, J. Kelly, SF. Shariat, JA. Witjes, JY. Teoh
520    9_
$a Background: The efficacy of intravesical chemotherapy maintenance for patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is inferior compared to intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG). How intravesical chemohyperthermia (CHT) compares with BCG is under investigation. Objective: To compare the oncological outcomes and safety profile between intravesical CHT and BCG treatment for intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies comparing CHT with BCG for intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC patients. A comprehensive literature search on OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library was conducted. Risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane RoB tool and ROBINS-I. Certainty of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: A total of 2,375 articles were identified and five studies were finally included. Among them, four randomised trials comprising 327 patients (CHT group: 156 patients; BCG group: 171 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. There were no significant differences in the 24-36 months recurrence rates (CHT: 29.5%, BCG: 37.4%; RR: 0.83, 95% CI 0.61-1.13; moderate certainty of evidence) and the 24-36 months progression rates (CHT: 4.4%, BCG: 7.6%, RR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.26-1.49; low certainty of evidence). There were also no significant differences in grade 1-2 adverse events (CHT group: 59.9%, BCG group 54.5%; RR = 1.10, 95% CI 0.93-1.30; moderate certainty of evidence) and grade 3 or above adverse events (CHT group: 23.2%, BCG group 22.5%; RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.69-1.43; low certainty of evidence). Conclusions: Intravesical CHT had equivalent oncological outcomes and similar safety profile when compared to BCG maintenance therapy for patients with intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC. CHT is a possible alternative treatment in the times of BCG shortage.
655    _2
$a systematický přehled $7 D000078182
700    1_
$a Chan, Vinson Wai-Shun $u School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
700    1_
$a Castellani, Daniele $u Unit of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy
700    1_
$a Chan, Erica On-Ting $u S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
700    1_
$a Ong, William Lay Keat $u Department of Urology, Penang General Hospital, George Town, Malaysia
700    1_
$a Peng, Qiang $u S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
700    1_
$a Moschini, Marco $u Klinik für Urologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Krajewski, Wojciech $u Department of Urology and Oncologic Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
700    1_
$a Pradere, Benjamin $u Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
700    1_
$a Ng, Chi-Fai $u S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
700    1_
$a Enikeev, Dmitry $u Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
700    1_
$a Vasdev, Nikhil $u Department of Urology, Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital Stevenage, School of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
700    1_
$a Ekin, Gokhan $u Department of Urology, Urla State Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
700    1_
$a Sousa, Alejandro $u Department of Urology, Comarcal Hospital, Monforte, Spain
700    1_
$a Leon, Juan $u Department of Urology, Comarcal Hospital, Monforte, Spain
700    1_
$a Guerrero-Ramos, Felix $u Department of Urology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
700    1_
$a Tan, Wei-Shen $u Division of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom $u Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom $u Department of Urology, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
700    1_
$a Kelly, John $u Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom $u Department of Urology, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
700    1_
$a Shariat, Shahrokh F $u Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia $u Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria $u Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States $u Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, United States $u Department of Urology, Charles University, Prague, Czechia $u Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
700    1_
$a Witjes, J Alfred $u Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands
700    1_
$a Teoh, Jeremy Yuen-Chun $u S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
773    0_
$w MED00208008 $t Frontiers in surgery $x 2296-875X $g Roč. 8, č. - (2021), s. 775527
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34888347 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20220107 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220112153532 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1745415 $s 1152394
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 8 $c - $d 775527 $e 20211123 $i 2296-875X $m Frontiers in surgery $n Front Surg $x MED00208008
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220107

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...