-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Inequalities in Health: Methodological Approaches to Spatial Differentiation
D. Hübelová, M. Kuncová, H. Vojáčková, J. Coufalová, A. Kozumplíková, FS. Lategan, BE. Chromková Manea
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2004
PubMed Central
od 2005
Europe PubMed Central
od 2005
ProQuest Central
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2004-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2005-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2008-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2009-01-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2004
PubMed
34886004
DOI
10.3390/ijerph182312275
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- poskytování zdravotní péče * MeSH
- socioekonomické faktory MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
The prevalence of inequalities in the general health position of communities can be assessed by using selected determinants. The aims of this article are three-fold: (1) to apply a comprehensive approach to the assessment of inequalities in the general health position of communities, (2) to determine the spatial differentiation of determinants, and (3) to present selected assessment methods and their impact on the results. To present a quantitative assessment of these inequalities in health status in communities, a composite indicator (Health Index) was developed. This Health Index is composed of 8 areas of evaluation and 60 indicators which include, amongst others, determinants of health status and healthcare at district level (LAU 1) in the Czech Republic. The data are evaluated using multicriteria decision-making methods (the WSA and TOPSIS methods). Findings suggest that, when all eight domains are assigned the same weight of one, the spatial differentiation among the districts is similar when using both methods. If different weightings are assigned to the districts, changes occur in both the index values and the rankings of the analyzed districts. For example, the allocation of weightings in both methods results in a rearrangement of the ranking of districts for which the Health Index is around the average.
Department of Development City Municipality of Břeclav 690 02 Břeclav Czech Republic
Department of Economic Studies College of Polytechnics Jihlava 586 01 Jihlava Czech Republic
Department of Technical Studies College of Polytechnics Jihlava 586 01 Jihlava Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22003172
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240910111117.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220113s2021 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/ijerph182312275 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34886004
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Hübelová, Dana $u Department of Social Studies, Faculty of Regional Development and International Studies, Mendel University in Brno, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Inequalities in Health: Methodological Approaches to Spatial Differentiation / $c D. Hübelová, M. Kuncová, H. Vojáčková, J. Coufalová, A. Kozumplíková, FS. Lategan, BE. Chromková Manea
- 520 9_
- $a The prevalence of inequalities in the general health position of communities can be assessed by using selected determinants. The aims of this article are three-fold: (1) to apply a comprehensive approach to the assessment of inequalities in the general health position of communities, (2) to determine the spatial differentiation of determinants, and (3) to present selected assessment methods and their impact on the results. To present a quantitative assessment of these inequalities in health status in communities, a composite indicator (Health Index) was developed. This Health Index is composed of 8 areas of evaluation and 60 indicators which include, amongst others, determinants of health status and healthcare at district level (LAU 1) in the Czech Republic. The data are evaluated using multicriteria decision-making methods (the WSA and TOPSIS methods). Findings suggest that, when all eight domains are assigned the same weight of one, the spatial differentiation among the districts is similar when using both methods. If different weightings are assigned to the districts, changes occur in both the index values and the rankings of the analyzed districts. For example, the allocation of weightings in both methods results in a rearrangement of the ranking of districts for which the Health Index is around the average.
- 650 12
- $a poskytování zdravotní péče $7 D003695
- 650 _2
- $a socioekonomické faktory $7 D012959
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $x epidemiologie $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Kuncová, Martina $u Department of Economic Studies, College of Polytechnics Jihlava, 586 01 Jihlava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Vojáčková, Hana $u Department of Technical Studies, College of Polytechnics Jihlava, 586 01 Jihlava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Coufalová, Jitka $u Department of Development, City Municipality of Břeclav, 690 02 Břeclav, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kozumplíková, Alice, $u Department of Environmental Studies, Faculty of Regional Development and International Studies, Mendel University in Brno, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic $d 1981- $7 mzk2007417610
- 700 1_
- $a Lategan, Francois Stefanus $u Department of Regional and Business Economics, Faculty of Regional Development and International Studies, Mendel University in Brno, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Chromková Manea, Beatrice Elena, $u Department of Social Studies, Faculty of Regional Development and International Studies, Mendel University in Brno, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic $d 1973- $7 pna2012693061
- 773 0_
- $w MED00176090 $t International journal of environmental research and public health $x 1660-4601 $g Roč. 18, č. 23 (2021)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34886004 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220113 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240910111114 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1750821 $s 1154321
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 18 $c 23 $e 20211123 $i 1660-4601 $m International journal of environmental research and public health $n Int. j. environ. res. public health $x MED00176090
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220113