-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
The Outcomes of Cemented Femoral Revisions for Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in the Elderly: Comparison with Cementless Stems
P. Sponer, M. Korbel, M. Grinac, L. Prokes, A. Bezrouk, T. Kucera
Jazyk angličtina Země Nový Zéland
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Free Medical Journals od 2006
PubMed Central od 2006
Europe PubMed Central od 2006
ProQuest Central od 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library od 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library od 2006-01-01
Taylor & Francis Open Access od 2006-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) od 2006-01-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest) od 2006-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources od 2008
Odkazy
PubMed
34737554
DOI
10.2147/cia.s306463
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- femur chirurgie MeSH
- fraktury femuru * chirurgie MeSH
- kyčelní protézy * MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- náhrada kyčelního kloubu * škodlivé účinky MeSH
- periprotetické fraktury * chirurgie MeSH
- reoperace MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Introduction: The present study compares the outcome of the long cemented stem and the revision uncemented stem used in periprosthetic femoral fractures. We propose that the revision with a long stem cemented prosthesis does not compromise fracture healing. Patients and Methods: A consecutive series of 37 patients, operated between 2010 and 2017, were enrolled in a retrospective analysis. A long cemented stem was implanted in 21 patients (study group; age at operation: 63 to 89 years). A distally tapered fluted uncemented stem was used in 16 patients (control group; age at operation: 35 to 77 years). The clinical outcome was evaluated with Merle d'Aubigné and Postel scoring system. Standard radiographs were taken before surgery, at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, and last follow-up. Any and all complications during the follow-up period were recorded. Results: Although a significant difference (P = 0.006) was observed in the post-operative Merle d´Aubigné score over the 12-month follow-up period, no significant difference (P = 0.066) was found in the post-operative pain score between the study and control groups. Periodic radiographic assessments showed the disappearance of radiolucent lines and the diaphyseal part of the fracture was healed in all 34 followed-up cases during the first annual follow-up. Early surgical complications were seen in both groups, the medical complications were observed only in the study group. Conclusion: Based on our results, periprosthetic fractures of the femur after a total hip arthroplasty were associated with significant morbidity and increased mortality in elderly patients. Revision with a long-stem cemented prosthesis provided early pain-free weight-bearing without compromising the healing of femoral fractures in elderly patients with osteoporotic bone, altered mobility, poor balance, and reduced cognitive capacity.
Charles University Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové Hradec Králové Czech Republic
Department of Orthopedic Surgery University Hospital in Hradec Králové Hradec Králové Czech Republic
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22003406
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220127150250.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220113s2021 nz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.2147/CIA.S306463 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34737554
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a nz
- 100 1_
- $a Sponer, Pavel $u Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital in Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic $u Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
- 245 14
- $a The Outcomes of Cemented Femoral Revisions for Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in the Elderly: Comparison with Cementless Stems / $c P. Sponer, M. Korbel, M. Grinac, L. Prokes, A. Bezrouk, T. Kucera
- 520 9_
- $a Introduction: The present study compares the outcome of the long cemented stem and the revision uncemented stem used in periprosthetic femoral fractures. We propose that the revision with a long stem cemented prosthesis does not compromise fracture healing. Patients and Methods: A consecutive series of 37 patients, operated between 2010 and 2017, were enrolled in a retrospective analysis. A long cemented stem was implanted in 21 patients (study group; age at operation: 63 to 89 years). A distally tapered fluted uncemented stem was used in 16 patients (control group; age at operation: 35 to 77 years). The clinical outcome was evaluated with Merle d'Aubigné and Postel scoring system. Standard radiographs were taken before surgery, at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, and last follow-up. Any and all complications during the follow-up period were recorded. Results: Although a significant difference (P = 0.006) was observed in the post-operative Merle d´Aubigné score over the 12-month follow-up period, no significant difference (P = 0.066) was found in the post-operative pain score between the study and control groups. Periodic radiographic assessments showed the disappearance of radiolucent lines and the diaphyseal part of the fracture was healed in all 34 followed-up cases during the first annual follow-up. Early surgical complications were seen in both groups, the medical complications were observed only in the study group. Conclusion: Based on our results, periprosthetic fractures of the femur after a total hip arthroplasty were associated with significant morbidity and increased mortality in elderly patients. Revision with a long-stem cemented prosthesis provided early pain-free weight-bearing without compromising the healing of femoral fractures in elderly patients with osteoporotic bone, altered mobility, poor balance, and reduced cognitive capacity.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 12
- $a náhrada kyčelního kloubu $x škodlivé účinky $7 D019644
- 650 12
- $a fraktury femuru $x chirurgie $7 D005264
- 650 _2
- $a femur $x chirurgie $7 D005269
- 650 12
- $a kyčelní protézy $7 D006622
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 12
- $a periprotetické fraktury $x chirurgie $7 D057068
- 650 _2
- $a reoperace $7 D012086
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Korbel, Martin $u Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital in Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic $u Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Grinac, Michal $u Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital in Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic $u Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Prokes, Libor $u Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital in Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic $u Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Bezrouk, Ales $u Department of Medical Biophysics, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kucera, Tomas $u Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital in Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic $u Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00173333 $t Clinical interventions in aging $x 1178-1998 $g Roč. 16, č. - (2021), s. 1869-1876
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34737554 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220113 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220127150246 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1751000 $s 1154555
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 16 $c - $d 1869-1876 $e 20211027 $i 1178-1998 $m Clinical interventions in aging $n Clin Interv Aging $x MED00173333
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220113