-
Something wrong with this record ?
Ultrasound-guided perineural vs. peritendinous corticosteroid injections in carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial
K. Mezian, K. Sobotová, M. Kuliha, KV. Chang, J. Ceé, Y. Angerová, L. Özçakar
Language English Country Italy
Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Adrenal Cortex Hormones MeSH
- Ultrasonography, Interventional MeSH
- Single-Blind Method MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Median Nerve diagnostic imaging MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Carpal Tunnel Syndrome * diagnostic imaging drug therapy MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid injections are proven to be effective in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS); however, the optimal injection site still remains unclear. AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of perineural vs. peritendinous target sites for corticosteroid injection in CTS. DESIGN: A randomized, single-blind, controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatients, tertiary care center. POPULATION: Forty-six patients were equally randomized into two intervention groups as group A (18 female and five male patients; mean age: 50.0±15.9 years; mean symptom duration: 5.9±3.3 months) and group B (19 female, four male patients; mean age: 54.3±15.0 years; mean symptom duration: 5.9±4.7 months). METHODS: Methylprednisolone acetate (40 mg) and 1 mL of 1% trimecaine hydrochloride was injected next to the median nerve (group A) or among flexor tendons away from the nerve (group B) under ultrasound (US) guidance. The visual analogue scale was used as the primary outcome measure, and the symptom severity scale and functional status scale of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire were used as the secondary subjective outcome measures. Two-point discrimination, grip strength, cross-sectional area, and distal motor latency were assessed as objective outcome measures. The data were collected at baseline and at 2, 6 and 12 weeks after the injection. RESULTS: Both groups showed improvement in subjective and objective measures at 2 weeks following the injection - also maintained up to 12 weeks during the follow-up (P<0.05). However, no difference was observed between the two groups (P<0.05). No serious adverse effects were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Both intervention techniques seem to be effective and safe in the conservative treatment of CTS. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Based on this study results, it might be noteworthy that physicians can opt for perineural or peritendinous injections without compromising the treatment efficacy and safety. Herewith, US guidance is, for sure, necessary for performing safe and accurate injections.
Department of Neurology Bruntál Czech Republic
Department of Neurosurgery J E Purkyně University Masaryk Hospital Ústí nad Labem Czech Republic
Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Hacettepe University Medical School Ankara Turkey
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22003569
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240131085535.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220113s2021 it f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06682-X $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33733720
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a it
- 100 1_
- $a Mezian, Kamal $u Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic - kamal.mezian@gmail.com
- 245 10
- $a Ultrasound-guided perineural vs. peritendinous corticosteroid injections in carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial / $c K. Mezian, K. Sobotová, M. Kuliha, KV. Chang, J. Ceé, Y. Angerová, L. Özçakar
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid injections are proven to be effective in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS); however, the optimal injection site still remains unclear. AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of perineural vs. peritendinous target sites for corticosteroid injection in CTS. DESIGN: A randomized, single-blind, controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatients, tertiary care center. POPULATION: Forty-six patients were equally randomized into two intervention groups as group A (18 female and five male patients; mean age: 50.0±15.9 years; mean symptom duration: 5.9±3.3 months) and group B (19 female, four male patients; mean age: 54.3±15.0 years; mean symptom duration: 5.9±4.7 months). METHODS: Methylprednisolone acetate (40 mg) and 1 mL of 1% trimecaine hydrochloride was injected next to the median nerve (group A) or among flexor tendons away from the nerve (group B) under ultrasound (US) guidance. The visual analogue scale was used as the primary outcome measure, and the symptom severity scale and functional status scale of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire were used as the secondary subjective outcome measures. Two-point discrimination, grip strength, cross-sectional area, and distal motor latency were assessed as objective outcome measures. The data were collected at baseline and at 2, 6 and 12 weeks after the injection. RESULTS: Both groups showed improvement in subjective and objective measures at 2 weeks following the injection - also maintained up to 12 weeks during the follow-up (P<0.05). However, no difference was observed between the two groups (P<0.05). No serious adverse effects were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Both intervention techniques seem to be effective and safe in the conservative treatment of CTS. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Based on this study results, it might be noteworthy that physicians can opt for perineural or peritendinous injections without compromising the treatment efficacy and safety. Herewith, US guidance is, for sure, necessary for performing safe and accurate injections.
- 650 _2
- $a hormony kůry nadledvin $7 D000305
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 12
- $a syndrom karpálního tunelu $x diagnostické zobrazování $x farmakoterapie $7 D002349
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a nervus medianus $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D008475
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a jednoduchá slepá metoda $7 D016037
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a intervenční ultrasonografie $7 D018084
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 700 1_
- $a Sobotová, Karolína $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kuliha, Martin $u Department of Neurology, Bruntál, Czech Republic $7 xx0313290
- 700 1_
- $a Chang, Ke-Vin $u Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Bei-Hu Branch, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
- 700 1_
- $a Ceé, Jiří $u Department of Neurosurgery, J.E. Purkyně University, Masaryk Hospital, Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Angerová, Yvona $u Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Özçakar, Levent $u Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
- 773 0_
- $w MED00174347 $t European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine $x 1973-9095 $g Roč. 57, č. 5 (2021), s. 775-782
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33733720 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220113 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240131085531 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1751126 $s 1154718
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 57 $c 5 $d 775-782 $e 20210318 $i 1973-9095 $m European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine $n Eur. j. phys. rehabil. med. $x MED00174347
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220113