Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Ultrasound-guided perineural vs. peritendinous corticosteroid injections in carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

K. Mezian, K. Sobotová, M. Kuliha, KV. Chang, J. Ceé, Y. Angerová, L. Özçakar

. 2021 ; 57 (5) : 775-782. [pub] 20210318

Language English Country Italy

Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid injections are proven to be effective in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS); however, the optimal injection site still remains unclear. AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of perineural vs. peritendinous target sites for corticosteroid injection in CTS. DESIGN: A randomized, single-blind, controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatients, tertiary care center. POPULATION: Forty-six patients were equally randomized into two intervention groups as group A (18 female and five male patients; mean age: 50.0±15.9 years; mean symptom duration: 5.9±3.3 months) and group B (19 female, four male patients; mean age: 54.3±15.0 years; mean symptom duration: 5.9±4.7 months). METHODS: Methylprednisolone acetate (40 mg) and 1 mL of 1% trimecaine hydrochloride was injected next to the median nerve (group A) or among flexor tendons away from the nerve (group B) under ultrasound (US) guidance. The visual analogue scale was used as the primary outcome measure, and the symptom severity scale and functional status scale of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire were used as the secondary subjective outcome measures. Two-point discrimination, grip strength, cross-sectional area, and distal motor latency were assessed as objective outcome measures. The data were collected at baseline and at 2, 6 and 12 weeks after the injection. RESULTS: Both groups showed improvement in subjective and objective measures at 2 weeks following the injection - also maintained up to 12 weeks during the follow-up (P<0.05). However, no difference was observed between the two groups (P<0.05). No serious adverse effects were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Both intervention techniques seem to be effective and safe in the conservative treatment of CTS. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Based on this study results, it might be noteworthy that physicians can opt for perineural or peritendinous injections without compromising the treatment efficacy and safety. Herewith, US guidance is, for sure, necessary for performing safe and accurate injections.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22003569
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240131085535.0
007      
ta
008      
220113s2021 it f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06682-X $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33733720
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a it
100    1_
$a Mezian, Kamal $u Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic - kamal.mezian@gmail.com
245    10
$a Ultrasound-guided perineural vs. peritendinous corticosteroid injections in carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial / $c K. Mezian, K. Sobotová, M. Kuliha, KV. Chang, J. Ceé, Y. Angerová, L. Özçakar
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid injections are proven to be effective in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS); however, the optimal injection site still remains unclear. AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of perineural vs. peritendinous target sites for corticosteroid injection in CTS. DESIGN: A randomized, single-blind, controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatients, tertiary care center. POPULATION: Forty-six patients were equally randomized into two intervention groups as group A (18 female and five male patients; mean age: 50.0±15.9 years; mean symptom duration: 5.9±3.3 months) and group B (19 female, four male patients; mean age: 54.3±15.0 years; mean symptom duration: 5.9±4.7 months). METHODS: Methylprednisolone acetate (40 mg) and 1 mL of 1% trimecaine hydrochloride was injected next to the median nerve (group A) or among flexor tendons away from the nerve (group B) under ultrasound (US) guidance. The visual analogue scale was used as the primary outcome measure, and the symptom severity scale and functional status scale of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire were used as the secondary subjective outcome measures. Two-point discrimination, grip strength, cross-sectional area, and distal motor latency were assessed as objective outcome measures. The data were collected at baseline and at 2, 6 and 12 weeks after the injection. RESULTS: Both groups showed improvement in subjective and objective measures at 2 weeks following the injection - also maintained up to 12 weeks during the follow-up (P<0.05). However, no difference was observed between the two groups (P<0.05). No serious adverse effects were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Both intervention techniques seem to be effective and safe in the conservative treatment of CTS. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Based on this study results, it might be noteworthy that physicians can opt for perineural or peritendinous injections without compromising the treatment efficacy and safety. Herewith, US guidance is, for sure, necessary for performing safe and accurate injections.
650    _2
$a hormony kůry nadledvin $7 D000305
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    12
$a syndrom karpálního tunelu $x diagnostické zobrazování $x farmakoterapie $7 D002349
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a nervus medianus $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D008475
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a jednoduchá slepá metoda $7 D016037
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a intervenční ultrasonografie $7 D018084
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
700    1_
$a Sobotová, Karolína $u Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kuliha, Martin $u Department of Neurology, Bruntál, Czech Republic $7 xx0313290
700    1_
$a Chang, Ke-Vin $u Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Bei-Hu Branch, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan
700    1_
$a Ceé, Jiří $u Department of Neurosurgery, J.E. Purkyně University, Masaryk Hospital, Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Angerová, Yvona $u Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Özçakar, Levent $u Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
773    0_
$w MED00174347 $t European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine $x 1973-9095 $g Roč. 57, č. 5 (2021), s. 775-782
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33733720 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220113 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240131085531 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1751126 $s 1154718
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 57 $c 5 $d 775-782 $e 20210318 $i 1973-9095 $m European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine $n Eur. j. phys. rehabil. med. $x MED00174347
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220113

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...