Detail
Článek
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Measurement of Chromosomal Arms and FISH Reveal Complex Genome Architecture and Standardized Karyotype of Model Fish, Genus Carassius

M. Knytl, NR. Fornaini

. 2021 ; 10 (9) : . [pub] 20210907

Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22003758

The widely distributed ray-finned fish genus Carassius is very well known due to its unique biological characteristics such as polyploidy, clonality, and/or interspecies hybridization. These biological characteristics have enabled Carassius species to be successfully widespread over relatively short period of evolutionary time. Therefore, this fish model deserves to be the center of attention in the research field. Some studies have already described the Carassius karyotype, but results are inconsistent in the number of morphological categories for individual chromosomes. We investigated three focal species: Carassius auratus, C. carassius and C. gibelio with the aim to describe their standardized diploid karyotypes, and to study their evolutionary relationships using cytogenetic tools. We measured length (q+plength) of each chromosome and calculated centromeric index (i value). We found: (i) The relationship between q+plength and i value showed higher similarity of C. auratus and C. carassius. (ii) The variability of i value within each chromosome expressed by means of the first quartile (Q1) up to the third quartile (Q3) showed higher similarity of C. carassius and C. gibelio. (iii) The fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis revealed higher similarity of C. auratus and C. gibelio. (iv) Standardized karyotype formula described using median value (Q2) showed differentiation among all investigated species: C. auratus had 24 metacentric (m), 40 submetacentric (sm), 2 subtelocentric (st), 2 acrocentric (a) and 32 telocentric (T) chromosomes (24m+40sm+2st+2a+32T); C. carassius: 16m+34sm+8st+42T; and C. gibelio: 16m+22sm+10st+2a+50T. (v) We developed R scripts applicable for the description of standardized karyotype for any other species. The diverse results indicated unprecedented complex genomic and chromosomal architecture in the genus Carassius probably influenced by its unique biological characteristics which make the study of evolutionary relationships more difficult than it has been originally postulated.

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22003758
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220127145911.0
007      
ta
008      
220113s2021 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3390/cells10092343 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34571992
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Knytl, Martin $u Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, 12843 Prague, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Measurement of Chromosomal Arms and FISH Reveal Complex Genome Architecture and Standardized Karyotype of Model Fish, Genus Carassius / $c M. Knytl, NR. Fornaini
520    9_
$a The widely distributed ray-finned fish genus Carassius is very well known due to its unique biological characteristics such as polyploidy, clonality, and/or interspecies hybridization. These biological characteristics have enabled Carassius species to be successfully widespread over relatively short period of evolutionary time. Therefore, this fish model deserves to be the center of attention in the research field. Some studies have already described the Carassius karyotype, but results are inconsistent in the number of morphological categories for individual chromosomes. We investigated three focal species: Carassius auratus, C. carassius and C. gibelio with the aim to describe their standardized diploid karyotypes, and to study their evolutionary relationships using cytogenetic tools. We measured length (q+plength) of each chromosome and calculated centromeric index (i value). We found: (i) The relationship between q+plength and i value showed higher similarity of C. auratus and C. carassius. (ii) The variability of i value within each chromosome expressed by means of the first quartile (Q1) up to the third quartile (Q3) showed higher similarity of C. carassius and C. gibelio. (iii) The fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis revealed higher similarity of C. auratus and C. gibelio. (iv) Standardized karyotype formula described using median value (Q2) showed differentiation among all investigated species: C. auratus had 24 metacentric (m), 40 submetacentric (sm), 2 subtelocentric (st), 2 acrocentric (a) and 32 telocentric (T) chromosomes (24m+40sm+2st+2a+32T); C. carassius: 16m+34sm+8st+42T; and C. gibelio: 16m+22sm+10st+2a+50T. (v) We developed R scripts applicable for the description of standardized karyotype for any other species. The diverse results indicated unprecedented complex genomic and chromosomal architecture in the genus Carassius probably influenced by its unique biological characteristics which make the study of evolutionary relationships more difficult than it has been originally postulated.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a kapři $x genetika $7 D002347
650    _2
$a mapování chromozomů $x metody $7 D002874
650    _2
$a chromozomy $x genetika $7 D002875
650    _2
$a diploidie $7 D004171
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a ryby $x genetika $7 D005399
650    _2
$a genetická variace $x genetika $7 D014644
650    _2
$a genom $x genetika $7 D016678
650    _2
$a karas zlatý $x genetika $7 D006054
650    _2
$a hybridizace in situ fluorescenční $x metody $7 D017404
650    _2
$a karyotyp $7 D059785
650    _2
$a karyotypizace $x metody $7 D007621
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a fylogeneze $7 D010802
650    _2
$a polyploidie $7 D011123
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Fornaini, Nicola Reinaldo $u Department of Cell Biology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, 12843 Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00194911 $t Cells $x 2073-4409 $g Roč. 10, č. 9 (2021)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34571992 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220113 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220127145907 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1751266 $s 1154907
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 10 $c 9 $e 20210907 $i 2073-4409 $m Cells $n Cells $x MED00194911
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220113

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace