-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Evaluation of Fine and Ultrafine Particles Proportion in Airborne Dust in an Industrial Area
O. Machaczka, V. Jirik, V. Brezinova, A. Vrtkova, H. Miturova, P. Riedlova, A. Dalecka, B. Hermanova, H. Slachtova, G. Siemiatkowski, L. Osrodka, RJ. Sram
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2004
PubMed Central
od 2005
Europe PubMed Central
od 2005
ProQuest Central
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2004-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2005-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2008-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2009-01-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2004
PubMed
34501505
DOI
10.3390/ijerph18178915
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- látky znečišťující vzduch * analýza MeSH
- monitorování životního prostředí MeSH
- pevné částice analýza MeSH
- prach MeSH
- velikost částic MeSH
- znečištění ovzduší * analýza MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
The health impacts of suspended particulate matter (SPM) are significantly associated with size-the smaller the aerosol particles, the stronger the biological effect. Quantitative evaluation of fine and ultrafine particles (FP and UFP) is, therefore, an integral part of ongoing epidemiological studies. The mass concentrations of SPM fractions (especially PM2.5, PM1.0, PM0.25) were measured in an industrial area using cascade personal samplers and a gravimetric method, and their mass ratio was determined. The results of PM2.5, PM1.0 were also compared with the reference measurement at stationary stations. The mean ratios PM2.5/SPM, PM1.0/SPM, and PM1.0/PM2.5 were 0.76, 0.65, and 0.86, respectively. Surprisingly, a mass dominance of UFP with an aerodynamic diameter <0.25 μm (PM0.25) was found with mean ratios of 0.43, 0.57, 0.67 in SPM, PM2.5 and PM1.0. The method used showed satisfactory agreement in comparison with reference measurements. The respirable fraction may consist predominantly of UFP. Despite the measures currently being taken to improve air quality, the most biologically efficient UFP can escape and remain in the air. UFP are currently determined primarily as particle number as opposed to the mass concentration used for conventional fractions. This complicates their mutual comparison and determination of individual fraction ratios.
Institute of Meteorology and Water Management National Research Institute 01 673 Warsaw Poland
Institute of Public Health in Ostrava 702 000 Ostrava Czech Republic
Lukasiewicz Research Network Institute of Ceramics and Building Materials 31 983 Cracow Poland
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22003898
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220127145740.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220113s2021 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/ijerph18178915 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34501505
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Machaczka, Ondrej $u Centre for Epidemiological Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Evaluation of Fine and Ultrafine Particles Proportion in Airborne Dust in an Industrial Area / $c O. Machaczka, V. Jirik, V. Brezinova, A. Vrtkova, H. Miturova, P. Riedlova, A. Dalecka, B. Hermanova, H. Slachtova, G. Siemiatkowski, L. Osrodka, RJ. Sram
- 520 9_
- $a The health impacts of suspended particulate matter (SPM) are significantly associated with size-the smaller the aerosol particles, the stronger the biological effect. Quantitative evaluation of fine and ultrafine particles (FP and UFP) is, therefore, an integral part of ongoing epidemiological studies. The mass concentrations of SPM fractions (especially PM2.5, PM1.0, PM0.25) were measured in an industrial area using cascade personal samplers and a gravimetric method, and their mass ratio was determined. The results of PM2.5, PM1.0 were also compared with the reference measurement at stationary stations. The mean ratios PM2.5/SPM, PM1.0/SPM, and PM1.0/PM2.5 were 0.76, 0.65, and 0.86, respectively. Surprisingly, a mass dominance of UFP with an aerodynamic diameter <0.25 μm (PM0.25) was found with mean ratios of 0.43, 0.57, 0.67 in SPM, PM2.5 and PM1.0. The method used showed satisfactory agreement in comparison with reference measurements. The respirable fraction may consist predominantly of UFP. Despite the measures currently being taken to improve air quality, the most biologically efficient UFP can escape and remain in the air. UFP are currently determined primarily as particle number as opposed to the mass concentration used for conventional fractions. This complicates their mutual comparison and determination of individual fraction ratios.
- 650 12
- $a látky znečišťující vzduch $x analýza $7 D000393
- 650 12
- $a znečištění ovzduší $x analýza $7 D000397
- 650 _2
- $a prach $7 D004391
- 650 _2
- $a monitorování životního prostředí $7 D004784
- 650 _2
- $a velikost částic $7 D010316
- 650 _2
- $a pevné částice $x analýza $7 D052638
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Jirik, Vitezslav $u Centre for Epidemiological Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Brezinova, Viera $u Centre for Epidemiological Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Vrtkova, Adela $u Centre for Epidemiological Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Department of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Miturova, Hana $u Institute of Public Health in Ostrava, 702 000 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Riedlova, Petra $u Centre for Epidemiological Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Dalecka, Andrea $u Centre for Epidemiological Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Hermanova, Barbara $u Centre for Epidemiological Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Slachtova, Hana $u Centre for Epidemiological Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Siemiatkowski, Grzegorz $u Lukasiewicz Research Network-Institute of Ceramics and Building Materials, 31-983 Cracow, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Osrodka, Leszek $u Institute of Meteorology and Water Management National Research Institute, 01-673 Warsaw, Poland
- 700 1_
- $a Sram, Radim J $u Centre for Epidemiological Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, 703 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00176090 $t International journal of environmental research and public health $x 1660-4601 $g Roč. 18, č. 17 (2021)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34501505 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220113 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220127145736 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1751380 $s 1155047
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 18 $c 17 $e 20210825 $i 1660-4601 $m International journal of environmental research and public health $n Int. j. environ. res. public health $x MED00176090
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220113