-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
A European perspective on dental cone beam computed tomography systems with a focus on optimisation utilising diagnostic reference levels
T. Siiskonen, A. Gallagher, O. Ciraj Bjelac, L. Novak, M. Sans Merce, J. Farah, J. Dabin, F. Malchair, Ž. Knežević, M. Kortesniemi
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
33461178
DOI
10.1088/1361-6498/abdd05
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- dávka záření MeSH
- diagnostické referenční úrovně * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- počítačová tomografie s kuželovým svazkem * MeSH
- radiometrie MeSH
- řízení kvality MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been available since the late 1990s for use in dentistry. European legislation requires optimisation of protection and the use of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) as well as regular quality control (QC) of the imaging devices, which is well outlined in existing international recommendations. Nevertheless, the level of application is not known. Earlier studies have indicated that few European countries have established DRLs and that patient doses (exposure parameters) have not been properly optimised. The EURADOS Working Group 12-Dosimetry in Medical Imaging undertook a survey to identify existing practices in Member States. Questionnaires were developed to identify equipment types, clinical procedures performed, and exposure settings used. The surveys were circulated to 22 countries resulting in 28 responses from 13 countries. Variations were identified in the exposure factors and in the doses delivered to patients for similar clinical indicators. Results confirm that patient doses are still not properly optimised and DRLs are largely not established. There is a need to promote the importance of performing QC testing of dental CBCT equipment and to further optimise patient exposure by establishment and use of DRLs as a part of a continuous optimisation process.
Belgian Nuclear Research Centre Boeretang 200 BE 2400 Mol Belgium
CAATS 119 Grande Rue 92310 Sevres France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège Sart Tilman 4000 Liège Belgium
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève Genève Switzerland
Hôpitaux universitaires Paris Sud Paris Sud University Hospitals Paris France
National Radiation Protection Institute Prague Czech Republic
Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority P O Box 14 FI 00881 Helsinki Finland
Ruđer Bošković Institute Bijenicka 54 Zagreb Croatia
Switzerland and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois Lausanne Switzerland
University Hospital Limerick Limerick Ireland
University of Belgrade Vinca Institute of Nuclear Sciences Belgrade Serbia
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22004277
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220127145401.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220113s2021 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1088/1361-6498/abdd05 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33461178
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Siiskonen, Teemu $u Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority (STUK), P.O. Box 14, FI-00881 Helsinki, Finland
- 245 12
- $a A European perspective on dental cone beam computed tomography systems with a focus on optimisation utilising diagnostic reference levels / $c T. Siiskonen, A. Gallagher, O. Ciraj Bjelac, L. Novak, M. Sans Merce, J. Farah, J. Dabin, F. Malchair, Ž. Knežević, M. Kortesniemi
- 520 9_
- $a Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been available since the late 1990s for use in dentistry. European legislation requires optimisation of protection and the use of diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) as well as regular quality control (QC) of the imaging devices, which is well outlined in existing international recommendations. Nevertheless, the level of application is not known. Earlier studies have indicated that few European countries have established DRLs and that patient doses (exposure parameters) have not been properly optimised. The EURADOS Working Group 12-Dosimetry in Medical Imaging undertook a survey to identify existing practices in Member States. Questionnaires were developed to identify equipment types, clinical procedures performed, and exposure settings used. The surveys were circulated to 22 countries resulting in 28 responses from 13 countries. Variations were identified in the exposure factors and in the doses delivered to patients for similar clinical indicators. Results confirm that patient doses are still not properly optimised and DRLs are largely not established. There is a need to promote the importance of performing QC testing of dental CBCT equipment and to further optimise patient exposure by establishment and use of DRLs as a part of a continuous optimisation process.
- 650 12
- $a počítačová tomografie s kuželovým svazkem $7 D054893
- 650 12
- $a diagnostické referenční úrovně $7 D000082162
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a řízení kvality $7 D011786
- 650 _2
- $a dávka záření $7 D011829
- 650 _2
- $a radiometrie $7 D011874
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Gallagher, Aoife $u University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- 700 1_
- $a Ciraj Bjelac, Olivera $u University of Belgrade, Vinca Institute of Nuclear Sciences (VINCA), Belgrade, Serbia
- 700 1_
- $a Novak, Leos $u National Radiation Protection Institute (NRPI), Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Sans Merce, Marta $u Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Genève, Switzerland $u Switzerland and Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
- 700 1_
- $a Farah, Jad $u Hôpitaux universitaires Paris-Sud (APHP), Paris Sud University Hospitals, Paris, France
- 700 1_
- $a Dabin, Jérémie $u Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK-CEN), Boeretang 200, BE-2400 Mol, Belgium
- 700 1_
- $a Malchair, Françoise $u CAATS, 119 Grande Rue, 92310 Sevres, France $u ZEPHYRA, 13 rue Forgeur, 4000 Liege, Belgium $u Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège (CHULg), Sart-Tilman, 4000 Liège, Belgium
- 700 1_
- $a Knežević, Željka $u Ruđer Bošković Institute (RBI), Bijenicka 54, Zagreb, Croatia
- 700 1_
- $a Kortesniemi, Mika $u HUS Medical Imaging Center, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, 00290 Helsinki, Finland
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002925 $t Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection $x 1361-6498 $g Roč. 41, č. 2 (2021)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33461178 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220113 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220127145358 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1751673 $s 1155426
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 41 $c 2 $e 20210601 $i 1361-6498 $m Journal of radiological protection $n J Radiol Prot $x MED00002925
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220113