• Something wrong with this record ?

Putative ligand binding sites of two functionally characterized bark beetle odorant receptors

JK. Yuvaraj, RE. Roberts, Y. Sonntag, XQ. Hou, E. Grosse-Wilde, A. Machara, DD. Zhang, BS. Hansson, U. Johanson, C. Löfstedt, MN. Andersson

. 2021 ; 19 (1) : 16. [pub] 20210126

Language English Country Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Grant support
217-2014-689 Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
2018-01444 Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
2017-03804 Vetenskapsrådet
CTS 17:25 Carl Tryggers Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig Forskning

BACKGROUND: Bark beetles are major pests of conifer forests, and their behavior is primarily mediated via olfaction. Targeting the odorant receptors (ORs) may thus provide avenues towards improved pest control. Such an approach requires information on the function of ORs and their interactions with ligands, which is also essential for understanding the functional evolution of these receptors. Hence, we aimed to identify a high-quality complement of ORs from the destructive spruce bark beetle Ips typographus (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae) and analyze their antennal expression and phylogenetic relationships with ORs from other beetles. Using 68 biologically relevant test compounds, we next aimed to functionally characterize ecologically important ORs, using two systems for heterologous expression. Our final aim was to gain insight into the ligand-OR interaction of the functionally characterized ORs, using a combination of computational and experimental methods. RESULTS: We annotated 73 ORs from an antennal transcriptome of I. typographus and report the functional characterization of two ORs (ItypOR46 and ItypOR49), which are responsive to single enantiomers of the common bark beetle pheromone compounds ipsenol and ipsdienol, respectively. Their responses and antennal expression correlate with the specificities, localizations, and/or abundances of olfactory sensory neurons detecting these enantiomers. We use homology modeling and molecular docking to predict their binding sites. Our models reveal a likely binding cleft lined with residues that previously have been shown to affect the responses of insect ORs. Within this cleft, the active ligands are predicted to specifically interact with residues Tyr84 and Thr205 in ItypOR46. The suggested importance of these residues in the activation by ipsenol is experimentally supported through site-directed mutagenesis and functional testing, and hydrogen bonding appears key in pheromone binding. CONCLUSIONS: The emerging insight into ligand binding in the two characterized ItypORs has a general importance for our understanding of the molecular and functional evolution of the insect OR gene family. Due to the ecological importance of the characterized receptors and widespread use of ipsenol and ipsdienol in bark beetle chemical communication, these ORs should be evaluated for their potential use in pest control and biosensors to detect bark beetle infestations.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22004667
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220127145055.0
007      
ta
008      
220113s2021 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12915-020-00946-6 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)33499862
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Yuvaraj, Jothi K $u Department of Biology, Lund University, SE-223 62, Lund, Sweden
245    10
$a Putative ligand binding sites of two functionally characterized bark beetle odorant receptors / $c JK. Yuvaraj, RE. Roberts, Y. Sonntag, XQ. Hou, E. Grosse-Wilde, A. Machara, DD. Zhang, BS. Hansson, U. Johanson, C. Löfstedt, MN. Andersson
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Bark beetles are major pests of conifer forests, and their behavior is primarily mediated via olfaction. Targeting the odorant receptors (ORs) may thus provide avenues towards improved pest control. Such an approach requires information on the function of ORs and their interactions with ligands, which is also essential for understanding the functional evolution of these receptors. Hence, we aimed to identify a high-quality complement of ORs from the destructive spruce bark beetle Ips typographus (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae) and analyze their antennal expression and phylogenetic relationships with ORs from other beetles. Using 68 biologically relevant test compounds, we next aimed to functionally characterize ecologically important ORs, using two systems for heterologous expression. Our final aim was to gain insight into the ligand-OR interaction of the functionally characterized ORs, using a combination of computational and experimental methods. RESULTS: We annotated 73 ORs from an antennal transcriptome of I. typographus and report the functional characterization of two ORs (ItypOR46 and ItypOR49), which are responsive to single enantiomers of the common bark beetle pheromone compounds ipsenol and ipsdienol, respectively. Their responses and antennal expression correlate with the specificities, localizations, and/or abundances of olfactory sensory neurons detecting these enantiomers. We use homology modeling and molecular docking to predict their binding sites. Our models reveal a likely binding cleft lined with residues that previously have been shown to affect the responses of insect ORs. Within this cleft, the active ligands are predicted to specifically interact with residues Tyr84 and Thr205 in ItypOR46. The suggested importance of these residues in the activation by ipsenol is experimentally supported through site-directed mutagenesis and functional testing, and hydrogen bonding appears key in pheromone binding. CONCLUSIONS: The emerging insight into ligand binding in the two characterized ItypORs has a general importance for our understanding of the molecular and functional evolution of the insect OR gene family. Due to the ecological importance of the characterized receptors and widespread use of ipsenol and ipsdienol in bark beetle chemical communication, these ORs should be evaluated for their potential use in pest control and biosensors to detect bark beetle infestations.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a vazebná místa $7 D001665
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a hmyzí proteiny $x chemie $x genetika $7 D019476
650    _2
$a ligandy $7 D008024
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a receptory pachové $x chemie $x genetika $7 D018035
650    _2
$a nosatcovití $x chemie $x genetika $7 D048889
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Roberts, Rebecca E $u Department of Biology, Lund University, SE-223 62, Lund, Sweden
700    1_
$a Sonntag, Yonathan $u Division of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, Department of Chemistry, Lund University, SE-223 62, Lund, Sweden
700    1_
$a Hou, Xiao-Qing $u Department of Biology, Lund University, SE-223 62, Lund, Sweden
700    1_
$a Grosse-Wilde, Ewald $u Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, 07745, Jena, Germany $u Present address: Faculty of Forestry & Wood Sci, Excellent Team for Mitigation, Czech University Life Sci Prague, Kamycka 129, Prague 6, 16521, Suchdol, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Machara, Aleš $u Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Gilead Sciences and IOCB Research Center, Flemingovo n. 2, 166 10, Prague 6, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Zhang, Dan-Dan $u Department of Biology, Lund University, SE-223 62, Lund, Sweden
700    1_
$a Hansson, Bill S $u Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, 07745, Jena, Germany
700    1_
$a Johanson, Urban $u Division of Biochemistry and Structural Biology, Department of Chemistry, Lund University, SE-223 62, Lund, Sweden
700    1_
$a Löfstedt, Christer $u Department of Biology, Lund University, SE-223 62, Lund, Sweden
700    1_
$a Andersson, Martin N $u Department of Biology, Lund University, SE-223 62, Lund, Sweden. martin_n.andersson@biol.lu.se
773    0_
$w MED00008168 $t BMC biology $x 1741-7007 $g Roč. 19, č. 1 (2021), s. 16
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33499862 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220113 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220127145052 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1751972 $s 1155816
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2021 $b 19 $c 1 $d 16 $e 20210126 $i 1741-7007 $m BMC biology $n BMC Biol $x MED00008168
GRA    __
$a 217-2014-689 $p Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
GRA    __
$a 2018-01444 $p Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
GRA    __
$a 2017-03804 $p Vetenskapsrådet
GRA    __
$a CTS 17:25 $p Carl Tryggers Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig Forskning
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220113

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...