-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Comparison of outcomes between people with and without central cord syndrome
G. Blasetti, C. Pavese, DD. Maier, N. Weidner, R. Rupp, R. Abel, BK. Yorck, K. Jiri, A. Curt, M. Molinari, M. Schubert, G. Scivoletto
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Odkazy
PubMed
32488195
DOI
10.1038/s41393-020-0491-x
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- centrální míšní syndrom * diagnóza epidemiologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- obnova funkce MeSH
- poranění míchy * komplikace epidemiologie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: Central cord syndrome (CCS) is reported to have better outcomes than other cervical lesions, especially for ambulation and bladder recovery. However, a formal comparison between patients with CCS and other incomplete cervical spinal cord injuries (iCSCI) is lacking. Aim of the study is to investigate the neurological and functional outcomes in patients with or without CCS. SETTING: European Multicenter Study. METHODS: Data following SCI were derived from the European Multicenter Study about Spinal Cord Injury Database. CCS was diagnosed based on a difference of at least ten points of motor score in favour of the lower extremities. Patients were evaluated at 30 days, 6 months and 1 year from injury. The neurological and functional data were collected at each time point based on the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord injury (ISNSCI) and Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM). Patients were selected with a matching procedure based on lesion severity, neurological level of injury (NLI) and age. Evaluation of the outcomes was performed by means of two-way Anova for repeated measures. RESULTS: The matching produced 110 comparable dyads. At all time points, upper extremity motor scores remained lower than lower extremity motor scores in CCS compared with iCSCI. With regard to daily life independence, both cohorts achieved comparable improvements in self-care sub-scores between T0 and T2 (6.6 ± 6.5 in CCS vs 8.2 ± 6.9 in iCSCI, p = 0.15) but this sub-score was significantly lower in CCS compared with iCSCI (3.6 ± 5.2 in CCS vs 7.3 ± 7.0 in iCSCI at T0, 13.7 ± 6.2 vs 16.5 ± 5.7 at T2), while the other sub-scores were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous reports, people with CCS have poorer outcomes of self-care ability compared with iCSCI.
Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Murnau 82418 Murnau Germany
Department of Clinical Surgical Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences University of Pavia Pavia Italy
SCI Centre Orthopaedic Department Ulm University Ulm Germany
Specialization School in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Tor Vergata University Rome Italy
Spinal Cord Injury Center Heidelberg University Hospital 69120 Heidelberg Germany
Spinal Cord Injury Center Hohe Warte Bayreuth Germany
Spinal Cord Injury Unit Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS Pavia Italy
Spinal Cord Unit University Hospital Motol Prague Czech Republic
Spinal Unit and Spinal Rehabilitation Lab IRCCS Fondazione S Lucia Rome Italy
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22004801
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220127144947.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220113s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1038/s41393-020-0491-x $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32488195
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Blasetti, Giulia $u Specialization School in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy $u Paediatric Neurorehabilitation Unit, Department of Neuroscience and Neurorehabilitation, Bambino Gesù Children Hospital, Passoscuro, Rome, Italy
- 245 10
- $a Comparison of outcomes between people with and without central cord syndrome / $c G. Blasetti, C. Pavese, DD. Maier, N. Weidner, R. Rupp, R. Abel, BK. Yorck, K. Jiri, A. Curt, M. Molinari, M. Schubert, G. Scivoletto
- 520 9_
- $a STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: Central cord syndrome (CCS) is reported to have better outcomes than other cervical lesions, especially for ambulation and bladder recovery. However, a formal comparison between patients with CCS and other incomplete cervical spinal cord injuries (iCSCI) is lacking. Aim of the study is to investigate the neurological and functional outcomes in patients with or without CCS. SETTING: European Multicenter Study. METHODS: Data following SCI were derived from the European Multicenter Study about Spinal Cord Injury Database. CCS was diagnosed based on a difference of at least ten points of motor score in favour of the lower extremities. Patients were evaluated at 30 days, 6 months and 1 year from injury. The neurological and functional data were collected at each time point based on the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord injury (ISNSCI) and Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM). Patients were selected with a matching procedure based on lesion severity, neurological level of injury (NLI) and age. Evaluation of the outcomes was performed by means of two-way Anova for repeated measures. RESULTS: The matching produced 110 comparable dyads. At all time points, upper extremity motor scores remained lower than lower extremity motor scores in CCS compared with iCSCI. With regard to daily life independence, both cohorts achieved comparable improvements in self-care sub-scores between T0 and T2 (6.6 ± 6.5 in CCS vs 8.2 ± 6.9 in iCSCI, p = 0.15) but this sub-score was significantly lower in CCS compared with iCSCI (3.6 ± 5.2 in CCS vs 7.3 ± 7.0 in iCSCI at T0, 13.7 ± 6.2 vs 16.5 ± 5.7 at T2), while the other sub-scores were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous reports, people with CCS have poorer outcomes of self-care ability compared with iCSCI.
- 650 12
- $a centrální míšní syndrom $x diagnóza $x epidemiologie $7 D020210
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a obnova funkce $7 D020127
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 12
- $a poranění míchy $x komplikace $x epidemiologie $7 D013119
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 700 1_
- $a Pavese, Chiara $u Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy $u Spinal Cord Injury Unit, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Maier, Doris D $u Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Murnau, 82418, Murnau, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Weidner, Norbert $u Spinal Cord Injury Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Rupp, Ruediger $u Spinal Cord Injury Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Abel, Rainer $u Spinal Cord Injury Center, Hohe Warte, Bayreuth, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Yorck, B Kalke $u SCI Centre, Orthopaedic Department, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
- 700 1_
- $a Jiri, Kriz $u Spinal Cord Unit, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Curt, Armin $u Department of Neurology, Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
- 700 1_
- $a Molinari, Marco $u Spinal Unit and Spinal Rehabilitation Lab, IRCCS Fondazione S. Lucia, Rome, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Schubert, Martin $u Department of Neurology, Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
- 700 1_
- $a Scivoletto, Giorgio $u Spinal Unit and Spinal Rehabilitation Lab, IRCCS Fondazione S. Lucia, Rome, Italy. g.scivoletto@hsantalucia.it
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006900 $t Spinal cord $x 1476-5624 $g Roč. 58, č. 12 (2020), s. 1263-1273
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32488195 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220113 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220127144943 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1752099 $s 1155950
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 58 $c 12 $d 1263-1273 $e 20200602 $i 1476-5624 $m Spinal cord $n Spinal Cord $x MED00006900
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220113