Detail
Článek
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Comparison of outcomes between people with and without central cord syndrome

G. Blasetti, C. Pavese, DD. Maier, N. Weidner, R. Rupp, R. Abel, BK. Yorck, K. Jiri, A. Curt, M. Molinari, M. Schubert, G. Scivoletto

. 2020 ; 58 (12) : 1263-1273. [pub] 20200602

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22004801

E-zdroje NLK Online Plný text

ProQuest Central od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: Central cord syndrome (CCS) is reported to have better outcomes than other cervical lesions, especially for ambulation and bladder recovery. However, a formal comparison between patients with CCS and other incomplete cervical spinal cord injuries (iCSCI) is lacking. Aim of the study is to investigate the neurological and functional outcomes in patients with or without CCS. SETTING: European Multicenter Study. METHODS: Data following SCI were derived from the European Multicenter Study about Spinal Cord Injury Database. CCS was diagnosed based on a difference of at least ten points of motor score in favour of the lower extremities. Patients were evaluated at 30 days, 6 months and 1 year from injury. The neurological and functional data were collected at each time point based on the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord injury (ISNSCI) and Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM). Patients were selected with a matching procedure based on lesion severity, neurological level of injury (NLI) and age. Evaluation of the outcomes was performed by means of two-way Anova for repeated measures. RESULTS: The matching produced 110 comparable dyads. At all time points, upper extremity motor scores remained lower than lower extremity motor scores in CCS compared with iCSCI. With regard to daily life independence, both cohorts achieved comparable improvements in self-care sub-scores between T0 and T2 (6.6 ± 6.5 in CCS vs 8.2 ± 6.9 in iCSCI, p = 0.15) but this sub-score was significantly lower in CCS compared with iCSCI (3.6 ± 5.2 in CCS vs 7.3 ± 7.0 in iCSCI at T0, 13.7 ± 6.2 vs 16.5 ± 5.7 at T2), while the other sub-scores were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous reports, people with CCS have poorer outcomes of self-care ability compared with iCSCI.

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22004801
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220127144947.0
007      
ta
008      
220113s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1038/s41393-020-0491-x $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32488195
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Blasetti, Giulia $u Specialization School in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy $u Paediatric Neurorehabilitation Unit, Department of Neuroscience and Neurorehabilitation, Bambino Gesù Children Hospital, Passoscuro, Rome, Italy
245    10
$a Comparison of outcomes between people with and without central cord syndrome / $c G. Blasetti, C. Pavese, DD. Maier, N. Weidner, R. Rupp, R. Abel, BK. Yorck, K. Jiri, A. Curt, M. Molinari, M. Schubert, G. Scivoletto
520    9_
$a STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: Central cord syndrome (CCS) is reported to have better outcomes than other cervical lesions, especially for ambulation and bladder recovery. However, a formal comparison between patients with CCS and other incomplete cervical spinal cord injuries (iCSCI) is lacking. Aim of the study is to investigate the neurological and functional outcomes in patients with or without CCS. SETTING: European Multicenter Study. METHODS: Data following SCI were derived from the European Multicenter Study about Spinal Cord Injury Database. CCS was diagnosed based on a difference of at least ten points of motor score in favour of the lower extremities. Patients were evaluated at 30 days, 6 months and 1 year from injury. The neurological and functional data were collected at each time point based on the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord injury (ISNSCI) and Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM). Patients were selected with a matching procedure based on lesion severity, neurological level of injury (NLI) and age. Evaluation of the outcomes was performed by means of two-way Anova for repeated measures. RESULTS: The matching produced 110 comparable dyads. At all time points, upper extremity motor scores remained lower than lower extremity motor scores in CCS compared with iCSCI. With regard to daily life independence, both cohorts achieved comparable improvements in self-care sub-scores between T0 and T2 (6.6 ± 6.5 in CCS vs 8.2 ± 6.9 in iCSCI, p = 0.15) but this sub-score was significantly lower in CCS compared with iCSCI (3.6 ± 5.2 in CCS vs 7.3 ± 7.0 in iCSCI at T0, 13.7 ± 6.2 vs 16.5 ± 5.7 at T2), while the other sub-scores were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous reports, people with CCS have poorer outcomes of self-care ability compared with iCSCI.
650    12
$a centrální míšní syndrom $x diagnóza $x epidemiologie $7 D020210
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a obnova funkce $7 D020127
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    12
$a poranění míchy $x komplikace $x epidemiologie $7 D013119
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
700    1_
$a Pavese, Chiara $u Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy $u Spinal Cord Injury Unit, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
700    1_
$a Maier, Doris D $u Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Murnau, 82418, Murnau, Germany
700    1_
$a Weidner, Norbert $u Spinal Cord Injury Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
700    1_
$a Rupp, Ruediger $u Spinal Cord Injury Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
700    1_
$a Abel, Rainer $u Spinal Cord Injury Center, Hohe Warte, Bayreuth, Germany
700    1_
$a Yorck, B Kalke $u SCI Centre, Orthopaedic Department, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
700    1_
$a Jiri, Kriz $u Spinal Cord Unit, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Curt, Armin $u Department of Neurology, Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Molinari, Marco $u Spinal Unit and Spinal Rehabilitation Lab, IRCCS Fondazione S. Lucia, Rome, Italy
700    1_
$a Schubert, Martin $u Department of Neurology, Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
700    1_
$a Scivoletto, Giorgio $u Spinal Unit and Spinal Rehabilitation Lab, IRCCS Fondazione S. Lucia, Rome, Italy. g.scivoletto@hsantalucia.it
773    0_
$w MED00006900 $t Spinal cord $x 1476-5624 $g Roč. 58, č. 12 (2020), s. 1263-1273
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32488195 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220113 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220127144943 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1752099 $s 1155950
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 58 $c 12 $d 1263-1273 $e 20200602 $i 1476-5624 $m Spinal cord $n Spinal Cord $x MED00006900
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220113

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat...