-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Alpha-defensins determination in different types of synovial fluid and parallel collected serum samples by ELISA
P. Kusnierova, I. Bystronova, P. Walder, R. Hlubek, F. Vsiansky, D. Stejskal
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2001
Free Medical Journals
od 1998
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2007-06-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2001
PubMed
33899825
DOI
10.5507/bp.2021.020
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- alfa-defensiny * MeSH
- antigeny CD14 MeSH
- biologické markery MeSH
- C-reaktivní protein MeSH
- ELISA * MeSH
- interleukin-6 MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- peptidové fragmenty MeSH
- synoviální tekutina MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
AIMS: The study aims were to verify the serum (S) and synovial fluid (SF) reference intervals (RIs) for human neutrophil defensins (HNP1-3); measure S and SF defensin concentrations in different types of SF, including non-inflammatory, inflammatory non-pyogenic, inflammatory pyogenic, and hemorrhagic; and to compare the HNP1-3 concentrations in SF and S with those of other inflammatory biomarkers. METHODS: SF and S samples were collected from 92 patients. HNP1-3 concentrations were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays; glucose, lactate, interleukin-6, and procalcitonin using an automatic analyzer; and presepsin using a Pathfast system. There were 61 non-inflammatory, 11 inflammatory non-pyogenic, 11 inflammatory pyogenic, and 9 hemorrhagic SF. Non-inflammatory SF was divided into non-inflammatory normal and non-inflammatory osteoarthritis. The former was used to estimate the HNP1-3 RI in SF and S. RESULTS: The estimated HNP1-3 RIs of SF and S were 12.47-437.42 mg/L and 5.45-44.75 μg/L, respectively. HNP1-3 differed significantly between S and SF and individual groups of SF (P<0.001 and P=0.001, respectively). There were significant relationships between SF HNP1-3 and S HNP1-3 (P<0.001), S C-reactive protein (P<0.001), and S interleukin-6 (P=0.007), and between SF HNP1-3 and SF C-reactive protein (P=0.004) and SF interleukin-6 (P<0.001). The highest kappa coefficient was between SF HNP1-3 and SF interleukin-6 (κ=0.507). CONCLUSIONS: We validated the SF HNP1-3 diagnostic kit and demonstrated that SF and S HNP1-3 are promising biomarkers for distinguishing inflammatory from non-inflammatory joint diseases.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
Literatura
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22007887
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220323102124.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220309s2021 xr d f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.5507/bp.2021.020 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33899825
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Kušnierová, Pavlína, $d 1978- $7 xx0140526 $u Institute of Laboratory Diagnostics, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Alpha-defensins determination in different types of synovial fluid and parallel collected serum samples by ELISA / $c P. Kusnierova, I. Bystronova, P. Walder, R. Hlubek, F. Vsiansky, D. Stejskal
- 504 __
- $a Literatura
- 520 9_
- $a AIMS: The study aims were to verify the serum (S) and synovial fluid (SF) reference intervals (RIs) for human neutrophil defensins (HNP1-3); measure S and SF defensin concentrations in different types of SF, including non-inflammatory, inflammatory non-pyogenic, inflammatory pyogenic, and hemorrhagic; and to compare the HNP1-3 concentrations in SF and S with those of other inflammatory biomarkers. METHODS: SF and S samples were collected from 92 patients. HNP1-3 concentrations were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays; glucose, lactate, interleukin-6, and procalcitonin using an automatic analyzer; and presepsin using a Pathfast system. There were 61 non-inflammatory, 11 inflammatory non-pyogenic, 11 inflammatory pyogenic, and 9 hemorrhagic SF. Non-inflammatory SF was divided into non-inflammatory normal and non-inflammatory osteoarthritis. The former was used to estimate the HNP1-3 RI in SF and S. RESULTS: The estimated HNP1-3 RIs of SF and S were 12.47-437.42 mg/L and 5.45-44.75 μg/L, respectively. HNP1-3 differed significantly between S and SF and individual groups of SF (P<0.001 and P=0.001, respectively). There were significant relationships between SF HNP1-3 and S HNP1-3 (P<0.001), S C-reactive protein (P<0.001), and S interleukin-6 (P=0.007), and between SF HNP1-3 and SF C-reactive protein (P=0.004) and SF interleukin-6 (P<0.001). The highest kappa coefficient was between SF HNP1-3 and SF interleukin-6 (κ=0.507). CONCLUSIONS: We validated the SF HNP1-3 diagnostic kit and demonstrated that SF and S HNP1-3 are promising biomarkers for distinguishing inflammatory from non-inflammatory joint diseases.
- 650 _2
- $a biologické markery $7 D015415
- 650 _2
- $a C-reaktivní protein $7 D002097
- 650 12
- $a ELISA $7 D004797
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a interleukin-6 $7 D015850
- 650 _2
- $a antigeny CD14 $7 D018950
- 650 _2
- $a peptidové fragmenty $7 D010446
- 650 _2
- $a synoviální tekutina $7 D013582
- 650 12
- $a alfa-defensiny $7 D023084
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Bystroňová, Iveta $7 xx0260201 $u Institute of Laboratory Diagnostics, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic $u Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Walder, Pavel $7 osd2014852514 $u Orthopedic Department, University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Hlubek, Rudolf $7 xx0260200 $u Orthopedic Department, University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Všianský, František $7 xx0260191 $u Institute of Laboratory Diagnostics, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Stejskal, David, $d 1967- $7 xx0042302 $u Institute of Laboratory Diagnostics, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00012606 $t Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia $x 1213-8118 $g Roč. 165, č. 4 (2021), s. 367-374
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33899825 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 1502 $c 958 $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220309 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220323102119 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1773017 $s 1159080
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 165 $c 4 $d 367-374 $e 20210419 $i 1213-8118 $m Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacký, Olomouc Czech Republic $n Biomed. Pap. Fac. Med. Palacký Univ. Olomouc Czech Repub. (Print) $x MED00012606
- LZP __
- $b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20220309