Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Tracking multiple fish

F. Děchtěrenko, D. Jakubková, J. Lukavský, CJ. Howard

. 2022 ; 10 (-) : e13031. [pub] 20220303

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article

Although the Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) task is a widely used experimental method for studying divided attention, tracking objects in the real world usually looks different. For example, in the real world, objects are usually clearly distinguishable from each other and also possess different movement patterns. One such case is tracking groups of creatures, such as tracking fish in an aquarium. We used movies of fish in an aquarium and measured general tracking performance in this task (Experiment 1). In Experiment 2, we compared tracking accuracy within-subjects in fish tracking, tracking typical MOT stimuli, and in a third condition using standard MOT uniform objects which possessed movement patterns similar to the real fish. This third condition was added to further examine the impact of different motion characteristics on tracking performance. Results within a Bayesian framework showed that tracking real fish shares similarities with tracking simple objects in a typical laboratory MOT task. Furthermore, we observed a close relationship between performance in both laboratory MOT tasks (typical and fish-like) and real fish tracking, suggesting that the commonly used laboratory MOT task possesses a good level of ecological validity.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22009862
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220425131607.0
007      
ta
008      
220420s2022 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.7717/peerj.13031 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)35261822
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Děchtěrenko, Filip $u Institute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000000030472915X
245    10
$a Tracking multiple fish / $c F. Děchtěrenko, D. Jakubková, J. Lukavský, CJ. Howard
520    9_
$a Although the Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) task is a widely used experimental method for studying divided attention, tracking objects in the real world usually looks different. For example, in the real world, objects are usually clearly distinguishable from each other and also possess different movement patterns. One such case is tracking groups of creatures, such as tracking fish in an aquarium. We used movies of fish in an aquarium and measured general tracking performance in this task (Experiment 1). In Experiment 2, we compared tracking accuracy within-subjects in fish tracking, tracking typical MOT stimuli, and in a third condition using standard MOT uniform objects which possessed movement patterns similar to the real fish. This third condition was added to further examine the impact of different motion characteristics on tracking performance. Results within a Bayesian framework showed that tracking real fish shares similarities with tracking simple objects in a typical laboratory MOT task. Furthermore, we observed a close relationship between performance in both laboratory MOT tasks (typical and fish-like) and real fish tracking, suggesting that the commonly used laboratory MOT task possesses a good level of ecological validity.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Jakubková, Daniela $u Institute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Lukavský, Jiří $u Institute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/000000021082229X $7 js20060505008
700    1_
$a Howard, Christina J $u Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom
773    0_
$w MED00184567 $t PeerJ $x 2167-8359 $g Roč. 10, č. - (2022), s. e13031
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35261822 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20220420 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220425131605 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1784416 $s 1161060
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 10 $c - $d e13031 $e 20220303 $i 2167-8359 $m PeerJ $n PeerJ $x MED00184567
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220420

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...