• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The clinical and paraclinical correlates of employment status in multiple sclerosis

B. Srpova, L. Sobisek, K. Novotna, T. Uher, L. Friedova, M. Vaneckova, J. Krasensky, E. Kubala Havrdova, D. Horakova

. 2022 ; 43 (3) : 1911-1920. [pub] 20210815

Jazyk angličtina Země Itálie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22010899
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2000-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Family Health Database (ProQuest) od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Psychology Database (ProQuest) od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem

PURPOSE: To identify the clinical and paraclinical markers of employment status in multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional sub-study investigating 1226 MS patients. To minimalized confounding effect, two groups of patients, matched by sex, age, and education, were selected: 307 patients with full time employment and 153 unemployed patients receiving disability pension. We explored associations between employment status and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), 25 Foot Walk Test (25FWT), Nine Hole Peg Test (9HPT), Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS), Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), SLOAN charts (SLOAN), and brain volumetric MRI measures. RESULTS: Both groups differed significantly on all variables of interest (p < 0.001). In the univariate analyses, EDSS, SDMT (Symbol Digit Modalities Test) adjusted for BDI, 25FWT, and 9HPT best explained variability in vocational status. In multivariate analyses, the combination of EDSS, 25FWT, SDMT, BDI, and corpus callosum fraction (CCF) explained the greatest variability. As a next step, after patients were matched by EDSS, differences in SDMT, 25FWT (both p < 0.001), 9HPT, CCF, and T2 lesion volume were still present (all p < 0.005) between both groups. The best multivariate model consisted of SDMT, BDI, and T2 lesion volume. CONCLUSIONS: EDSS, walking ability, cognitive performance, and MRI volumetric parameters are independently associated with employment status.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22010899
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240903113115.0
007      
ta
008      
220425s2022 it f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s10072-021-05553-z $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34392392
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a it
100    1_
$a Srpová, Barbora $u Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. barbora.srpova@vfn.cz $1 https://orcid.org/0000000280926625 $7 xx0321726
245    14
$a The clinical and paraclinical correlates of employment status in multiple sclerosis / $c B. Srpova, L. Sobisek, K. Novotna, T. Uher, L. Friedova, M. Vaneckova, J. Krasensky, E. Kubala Havrdova, D. Horakova
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: To identify the clinical and paraclinical markers of employment status in multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: This was a cross-sectional sub-study investigating 1226 MS patients. To minimalized confounding effect, two groups of patients, matched by sex, age, and education, were selected: 307 patients with full time employment and 153 unemployed patients receiving disability pension. We explored associations between employment status and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), 25 Foot Walk Test (25FWT), Nine Hole Peg Test (9HPT), Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS), Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), SLOAN charts (SLOAN), and brain volumetric MRI measures. RESULTS: Both groups differed significantly on all variables of interest (p < 0.001). In the univariate analyses, EDSS, SDMT (Symbol Digit Modalities Test) adjusted for BDI, 25FWT, and 9HPT best explained variability in vocational status. In multivariate analyses, the combination of EDSS, 25FWT, SDMT, BDI, and corpus callosum fraction (CCF) explained the greatest variability. As a next step, after patients were matched by EDSS, differences in SDMT, 25FWT (both p < 0.001), 9HPT, CCF, and T2 lesion volume were still present (all p < 0.005) between both groups. The best multivariate model consisted of SDMT, BDI, and T2 lesion volume. CONCLUSIONS: EDSS, walking ability, cognitive performance, and MRI volumetric parameters are independently associated with employment status.
650    _2
$a průřezové studie $7 D003430
650    _2
$a posuzování pracovní neschopnosti $7 D004185
650    _2
$a zaměstnanost $7 D004651
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $7 D008279
650    12
$a roztroušená skleróza $x komplikace $7 D009103
650    _2
$a neuropsychologické testy $7 D009483
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Sobisek, Lukas $u Department of Statistics and Probability, University of Economics in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Novotna, Klara $u Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Uher, Tomas $u Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Friedová, Lucie, $u Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $d 1987- $7 xx0247500
700    1_
$a Vaneckova, Manuela $u Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Krasensky, Jan $u Department of Radiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kubala Havrdova, Eva $u Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Horakova, Dana $u Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00005781 $t Neurological sciences $x 1590-3478 $g Roč. 43, č. 3 (2022), s. 1911-1920
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34392392 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220425 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240903113112 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1788830 $s 1162097
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 43 $c 3 $d 1911-1920 $e 20210815 $i 1590-3478 $m Neurological sciences $n Neurol Sci $x MED00005781
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220425

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...