• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Advanced microextraction techniques for the analysis of amphetamines in human breast milk and their comparison with conventional methods

H. Bavlovič Piskáčková, A. Nemeškalová, R. Kučera, S. Pedersen-Bjergaard, V. Najmanová, P. Štěrbová-Kovaříková, M. Kuchař, D. Sýkora

. 2022 ; 210 (-) : 114549. [pub] 20211223

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22010964

Breast milk analysis provides useful information about acute newborn exposure to harmful substances, such as psychoactive drugs abused by a nursing mother. Since breast milk represents a complex matrix with large amounts of interfering compounds, a comprehensive sample pre-treatment is necessary. This work focuses on determination of amphetamines and synthetic cathinones in human breast milk by microextraction techniques (liquid-phase microextraction and electromembrane extraction), and their comparison to more conventional treatment methods (protein precipitation, liquid-liquid extraction, and salting-out assisted liquid-liquid extraction). The aim of this work was to optimize and validate all the extraction procedures and thoroughly assess their advantages and disadvantages with special regard to their routine clinical use. The applicability of the extractions was further verified by the analysis of six real samples collected from breastfeeding mothers suspected of amphetamine abuse. The membrane microextraction techniques turned out to be the most advantageous as they required low amounts of organic solvents but still provided efficient sample clean-up, excellent quantification limit (0.5 ng mL-1), and good recovery (81-91% and 40-89% for electromembrane extraction and liquid-phase microextraction, respectively). The traditional liquid-liquid extraction as well as the salting-out assisted liquid-liquid extraction showed comparable recoveries (41-85% and 63-88%, respectively), but higher quantification limits (2.5 ng mL-1 and 5 ng mL-1, respectively). Moreover, these methods required multiple operating steps and were time consuming. Protein precipitation was fast and simple, but it demonstrated poor sample clean-up, low recovery (56-58%) and high quantification limit (5 ng mL-1). Based on the overall results, microextraction methods can be considered promising candidates, even for routine laboratory use.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22010964
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220506130045.0
007      
ta
008      
220425s2022 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jpba.2021.114549 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34998075
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Bavlovič Piskáčková, Hana $u Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Akademika Heyrovského 1203, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Advanced microextraction techniques for the analysis of amphetamines in human breast milk and their comparison with conventional methods / $c H. Bavlovič Piskáčková, A. Nemeškalová, R. Kučera, S. Pedersen-Bjergaard, V. Najmanová, P. Štěrbová-Kovaříková, M. Kuchař, D. Sýkora
520    9_
$a Breast milk analysis provides useful information about acute newborn exposure to harmful substances, such as psychoactive drugs abused by a nursing mother. Since breast milk represents a complex matrix with large amounts of interfering compounds, a comprehensive sample pre-treatment is necessary. This work focuses on determination of amphetamines and synthetic cathinones in human breast milk by microextraction techniques (liquid-phase microextraction and electromembrane extraction), and their comparison to more conventional treatment methods (protein precipitation, liquid-liquid extraction, and salting-out assisted liquid-liquid extraction). The aim of this work was to optimize and validate all the extraction procedures and thoroughly assess their advantages and disadvantages with special regard to their routine clinical use. The applicability of the extractions was further verified by the analysis of six real samples collected from breastfeeding mothers suspected of amphetamine abuse. The membrane microextraction techniques turned out to be the most advantageous as they required low amounts of organic solvents but still provided efficient sample clean-up, excellent quantification limit (0.5 ng mL-1), and good recovery (81-91% and 40-89% for electromembrane extraction and liquid-phase microextraction, respectively). The traditional liquid-liquid extraction as well as the salting-out assisted liquid-liquid extraction showed comparable recoveries (41-85% and 63-88%, respectively), but higher quantification limits (2.5 ng mL-1 and 5 ng mL-1, respectively). Moreover, these methods required multiple operating steps and were time consuming. Protein precipitation was fast and simple, but it demonstrated poor sample clean-up, low recovery (56-58%) and high quantification limit (5 ng mL-1). Based on the overall results, microextraction methods can be considered promising candidates, even for routine laboratory use.
650    _2
$a amfetaminy $7 D000662
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a novorozenec $7 D007231
650    _2
$a limita detekce $7 D057230
650    12
$a mikroextrakce kapalné fáze $7 D059627
650    _2
$a extrakce kapalina-kapalina $7 D059625
650    12
$a mateřské mléko $7 D008895
650    _2
$a rozpouštědla $7 D012997
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Nemeškalová, Alžběta $u Department of Analytical Chemistry, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic; Forensic Laboratory of Biologically Active Substances, Department of Chemistry of Natural Compounds, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kučera, Radim $u Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Akademika Heyrovského 1203, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Pedersen-Bjergaard, Stig $u Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, P.O.Box 1068 Blindern, 0316, Oslo, Norway; Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 2, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
700    1_
$a Najmanová, Věra $u Institute of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Ke Karlovu 2, 121 08 Prague 2, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Štěrbová-Kovaříková, Petra $u Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Akademika Heyrovského 1203, 500 05 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kuchař, Martin $u Forensic Laboratory of Biologically Active Substances, Department of Chemistry of Natural Compounds, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic; National Institute of Mental Health, Topolová 748, 250 67 Klecany, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Sýkora, David $u Department of Analytical Chemistry, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic. Electronic address: david.sykora@vscht.cz
773    0_
$w MED00002894 $t Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis $x 1873-264X $g Roč. 210, č. - (2022), s. 114549
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34998075 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220425 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220506130038 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1788867 $s 1162162
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 210 $c - $d 114549 $e 20211223 $i 1873-264X $m Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis $n J Pharm Biomed Anal $x MED00002894
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220425

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...