• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

What is the current clinical practice in pituitary adenoma surgery in Europe? European Pituitary Adenoma Surgery Survey (EU-PASS) results-technical part

M. Májovský, A. Grotenhuis, N. Foroglou, F. Zenga, S. Froehlich, F. Ringel, N. Sampron, N. Thomas, M. Komarc, D. Netuka

. 2022 ; 45 (1) : 831-841. [pub] 20210802

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc22011206

Pituitary adenoma surgery has evolved rapidly in recent decades, changing clinical practice markedly and raising new challenges. There is no current consensus or guidelines for perioperative care that includes possible complication management. This study aims to determine current practice across European neurosurgical centres. We created a list of eligible departments performing pituitary adenoma surgery based on cooperation with EANS, national neurosurgical societies, and personal communication with local neurosurgeons. We contacted the chairpersons from each department and asked them (or another responsible neurosurgeon) to fill out the survey. The survey consisted of 58 questions. For further analysis, departments were divided into subgroups: "academic"/ "non-academic centre", "high-volume"/"low-volume", "mainly endoscopic"/ "mainly microscopic"/ "mixed practise", and by geographical regions. Data from 254 departments from 34 countries were obtained. The average time to complete the survey was 18 min. Notably, the endoscopic approach is the predominant surgical approach in Europe, used in 56.8% of the centres. In routine cases without intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak, high-volume centres are less pedantic with sellar closure when compared with low-volume centres (p < 0.001). On the other hand, when a postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak occurs, high-volume centres are more active and indicate early reoperation (p = 0.013). Less than 15% of the participating centres perform early postoperative MRI scans. Marked variation was noted among different groups of respondents and some contentious issues are discussed. Such information can encourage useful debate about the reasons for the variations seen and perhaps help develop standardised protocols to improve patient outcomes. A future research focus is to compare European results with other regions.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc22011206
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220506130133.0
007      
ta
008      
220425s2022 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s10143-021-01614-1 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)34337683
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Májovský, Martin $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. martin.majovsky@uvn.cz $1 https://orcid.org/0000000177255181 $7 xx0228525
245    10
$a What is the current clinical practice in pituitary adenoma surgery in Europe? European Pituitary Adenoma Surgery Survey (EU-PASS) results-technical part / $c M. Májovský, A. Grotenhuis, N. Foroglou, F. Zenga, S. Froehlich, F. Ringel, N. Sampron, N. Thomas, M. Komarc, D. Netuka
520    9_
$a Pituitary adenoma surgery has evolved rapidly in recent decades, changing clinical practice markedly and raising new challenges. There is no current consensus or guidelines for perioperative care that includes possible complication management. This study aims to determine current practice across European neurosurgical centres. We created a list of eligible departments performing pituitar $a Pituitary adenoma surgery has evolved rapidly in recent decades changing clinical practice markedly and raising new challenges There is no current consensus or guidelines for perioperative care that includes possible complication management This study aims to determine current practice across European neurosurgical centres We created a list of eligible departments performing pituitary ad $a Pituitary adenoma surgery has evolved rapidly in recent decades, changing clinical practice markedly and raising new challenges. There is no current consensus or guidelines for perioperative care that includes possible complication management. This study aims to determine current practice across European neurosurgical centres. We created a list of eligible departments performing pituitary adenoma surgery based on cooperation with EANS, national neurosurgical societies, and personal communication with local neurosurgeons. We contacted the chairpersons from each department and asked them (or another responsible neurosurgeon) to fill out the survey. The survey consisted of 58 questions. For further analysis, departments were divided into subgroups: "academic"/ "non-academic centre", "high-volume"/"low-volume", "mainly endoscopic"/ "mainly microscopic"/ "mixed practise", and by geographical regions. Data from 254 departments from 34 countries were obtained. The average time to complete the survey was 18 min. Notably, the endoscopic approach is the predominant surgical approach in Europe, used in 56.8% of the centres. In routine cases without intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak, high-volume centres are less pedantic with sellar closure when compared with low-volume centres (p < 0.001). On the other hand, when a postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak occurs, high-volume centres are more active and indicate early reoperation (p = 0.013). Less than 15% of the participating centres perform early postoperative MRI scans. Marked variation was noted among different groups of respondents and some contentious issues are discussed. Such information can encourage useful debate about the reasons for the variations seen and perhaps help develop standardised protocols to improve patient outcomes. A future research focus is to compare European results with other regions.
650    12
$a adenom $x chirurgie $7 D000236
650    _2
$a únik mozkomíšního moku $7 D065634
650    _2
$a endoskopie $7 D004724
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a nádory hypofýzy $x chirurgie $7 D010911
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Grotenhuis, Andre $u Neurosurgery Department, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
700    1_
$a Foroglou, Nicolas $u 1St Department of Neurosurgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
700    1_
$a Zenga, Francesco $u Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Turin, Italy
700    1_
$a Froehlich, Sebastien $u Department of Neurosurgery, Lariboisière University Hospital, Paris, France
700    1_
$a Ringel, Florian $u Department of Neurosurgery, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany
700    1_
$a Sampron, Nicolas $u Neurosurgery Department, University Hospital Donostia, San Sebastian, Spain
700    1_
$a Thomas, Nick $u Department of Neurosurgery, King's College, London, UK
700    1_
$a Komarc, Martin $u Institute of Biophysics and Informatics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic $u Department of Methodology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Netuka, David $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Military University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00003513 $t Neurosurgical review $x 1437-2320 $g Roč. 45, č. 1 (2022), s. 831-841
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34337683 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20220425 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220506130125 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1789021 $s 1162404
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2022 $b 45 $c 1 $d 831-841 $e 20210802 $i 1437-2320 $m Neurosurgical review $n Neurosurg Rev $x MED00003513
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20220425

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

    Možnosti archivace