-
Something wrong with this record ?
Effect of training volume on footstrike patterns over an exhaustive run
J. Urbaczka, JF. Silvernail, D. Jandacka
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Running * MeSH
- Biomechanical Phenomena MeSH
- Ankle Joint MeSH
- Ankle MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Foot MeSH
- Shoes MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
BACKGROUND: Although footstrike pattern (FP) may not be a factor influencing running performance, 11-75% of world-class distance runners use a non-rearfoot FP. However, little attention has been paid to describe the effect of running volume on FP changes when a runner is fatigued. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does the training volume provide an adequate stimulus to mitigate FP changes during an exhaustive run in non-rearfoot, habitual minimalist footwear runners? METHODS: The objective of this study was to compare FP between non-rearfoot, habitual minimalist footwear runners with a moderate training volume (MT) and a high training volume (HT) during an exhaustive run on a motorized treadmill. Based on their weekly training volume (distance), twenty-eight runners were arranged into two groups paired by height and age. At the first visit, runners underwent a VO2max test to acquire their velocity for the exhaustive run. During the second visit, biomechanical and physiological analysis of the beginning and the end phase of the exhaustive run was done. RESULTS: The frontal plane foot angle, the sagittal plane ankle angle at the initial contact (IC), and the foot eversion ROM showed a significant interaction effect (P < 0.05). Additionally, the sagittal plane footstrike angle, the frontal plane foot angle, the sagittal plane ankle angle, knee flexion angle at IC and foot eversion ROM showed a significant effect of fatigue (P < 0.05). Finally, the frontal plane foot angle, the sagittal plane footstrike angle, the sagittal plane ankle angle, and the knee flexion angle showed significant group effects (P < 0.05). SIGNIFICANCE: The training volume affects the footstrike pattern of non-rearfoot, habitual minimalist footwear runners when they are fatigued. The highly trained runners maintained their ankle angle throughout the exhaustive running protocol, whereas the moderately trained group changed the frontal and sagittal plane characteristics of their footstrike pattern.
Department of Human Movement Studies University of Ostrava Czech Republic
Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition Sciences University of Nevada Las Vegas USA
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22011475
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230522141700.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220425s2022 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.10.040 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34753001
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Urbaczka, Jan $u Department of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Czech Republic. Electronic address: jan.urbaczka@osu.cz $7 xx0301795
- 245 10
- $a Effect of training volume on footstrike patterns over an exhaustive run / $c J. Urbaczka, JF. Silvernail, D. Jandacka
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Although footstrike pattern (FP) may not be a factor influencing running performance, 11-75% of world-class distance runners use a non-rearfoot FP. However, little attention has been paid to describe the effect of running volume on FP changes when a runner is fatigued. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does the training volume provide an adequate stimulus to mitigate FP changes during an exhaustive run in non-rearfoot, habitual minimalist footwear runners? METHODS: The objective of this study was to compare FP between non-rearfoot, habitual minimalist footwear runners with a moderate training volume (MT) and a high training volume (HT) during an exhaustive run on a motorized treadmill. Based on their weekly training volume (distance), twenty-eight runners were arranged into two groups paired by height and age. At the first visit, runners underwent a VO2max test to acquire their velocity for the exhaustive run. During the second visit, biomechanical and physiological analysis of the beginning and the end phase of the exhaustive run was done. RESULTS: The frontal plane foot angle, the sagittal plane ankle angle at the initial contact (IC), and the foot eversion ROM showed a significant interaction effect (P < 0.05). Additionally, the sagittal plane footstrike angle, the frontal plane foot angle, the sagittal plane ankle angle, knee flexion angle at IC and foot eversion ROM showed a significant effect of fatigue (P < 0.05). Finally, the frontal plane foot angle, the sagittal plane footstrike angle, the sagittal plane ankle angle, and the knee flexion angle showed significant group effects (P < 0.05). SIGNIFICANCE: The training volume affects the footstrike pattern of non-rearfoot, habitual minimalist footwear runners when they are fatigued. The highly trained runners maintained their ankle angle throughout the exhaustive running protocol, whereas the moderately trained group changed the frontal and sagittal plane characteristics of their footstrike pattern.
- 650 _2
- $a kotník $7 D000842
- 650 _2
- $a hlezenní kloub $7 D000843
- 650 _2
- $a biomechanika $7 D001696
- 650 _2
- $a noha (od hlezna dolů) $7 D005528
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a běh $7 D012420
- 650 _2
- $a obuv $7 D012775
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Silvernail, Julia Freedman $u Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition Sciences. University of Nevada Las Vegas, USA
- 700 1_
- $a Jandacka, Daniel $u Department of Human Movement Studies, University of Ostrava, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001869 $t Gait & posture $x 1879-2219 $g Roč. 91, č. - (2022), s. 240-246
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34753001 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220425 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230522141658 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1789197 $s 1162673
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2022 $b 91 $c - $d 240-246 $e 20211030 $i 1879-2219 $m Gait & posture $n Gait posture $x MED00001869
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220425