-
Something wrong with this record ?
Atrial Septostomy for Left Ventricular Unloading During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Cardiogenic Shock: Animal Model
M. Mlcek, P. Meani, M. Cotza, M. Kowalewski, GM. Raffa, E. Kuriscak, M. Popkova, M. Pilato, A. Arcadipane, M. Ranucci, R. Lorusso, J. Belohlavek
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Shock, Cardiogenic * diagnosis therapy MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation * methods MeSH
- Disease Models, Animal MeSH
- Swine MeSH
- Vena Cava, Superior MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to quantify and understand the unloading effect of percutaneous balloon atrial septostomy (BAS) in acute cardiogenic shock (CS) treated with venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO). BACKGROUND: In CS treated with VA ECMO, increased left ventricular (LV) afterload is observed that commonly interferes with myocardial recovery or even promotes further LV deterioration. Several techniques for LV unloading exist, but the optimal strategy and the actual extent of such procedures have not been fully disclosed. METHODS: In a porcine model (n = 11; weight 56 kg [53-58 kg]), CS was induced by coronary artery balloon occlusion (57 minutes [53-64 minutes]). Then, a step-up VA ECMO protocol (40-80 mL/kg/min) was run before and after percutaneous BAS was performed. LV pressure-volume loops and multiple hemoglobin saturation data were evaluated. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to assess individual variable differences. RESULTS: Immediately after BAS while on VA ECMO support, LV work decreased significantly: pressure-volume area, end-diastolic pressure, and stroke volume to ∼78% and end-systolic pressure to ∼86%, while superior vena cava and tissue oximetry did not change. During elevating VA ECMO support (40-80 mL/kg/min) with BAS vs without BAS, we observed 1) significantly less mechanical work increase (122% vs 172%); 2) no end-diastolic volume increase (100% vs 111%); and 3) a considerable increase in end-systolic pressure (134% vs 144%). CONCLUSIONS: In acute CS supported by VA ECMO, atrial septostomy is an effective LV unloading tool. LV pressure is a key component of LV work load, so whenever LV work reduction is a priority, arterial pressure should carefully be titrated low while maintaining organ perfusion.
Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht Maastricht University Maastricht the Netherlands
Department of Physiology 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22011634
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220506131257.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220425s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.09.011 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)34949394
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Mlcek, Mikulas $u Department of Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: mikulas.mlcek@lf1.cuni.cz
- 245 10
- $a Atrial Septostomy for Left Ventricular Unloading During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Cardiogenic Shock: Animal Model / $c M. Mlcek, P. Meani, M. Cotza, M. Kowalewski, GM. Raffa, E. Kuriscak, M. Popkova, M. Pilato, A. Arcadipane, M. Ranucci, R. Lorusso, J. Belohlavek
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to quantify and understand the unloading effect of percutaneous balloon atrial septostomy (BAS) in acute cardiogenic shock (CS) treated with venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO). BACKGROUND: In CS treated with VA ECMO, increased left ventricular (LV) afterload is observed that commonly interferes with myocardial recovery or even promotes further LV deterioration. Several techniques for LV unloading exist, but the optimal strategy and the actual extent of such procedures have not been fully disclosed. METHODS: In a porcine model (n = 11; weight 56 kg [53-58 kg]), CS was induced by coronary artery balloon occlusion (57 minutes [53-64 minutes]). Then, a step-up VA ECMO protocol (40-80 mL/kg/min) was run before and after percutaneous BAS was performed. LV pressure-volume loops and multiple hemoglobin saturation data were evaluated. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to assess individual variable differences. RESULTS: Immediately after BAS while on VA ECMO support, LV work decreased significantly: pressure-volume area, end-diastolic pressure, and stroke volume to ∼78% and end-systolic pressure to ∼86%, while superior vena cava and tissue oximetry did not change. During elevating VA ECMO support (40-80 mL/kg/min) with BAS vs without BAS, we observed 1) significantly less mechanical work increase (122% vs 172%); 2) no end-diastolic volume increase (100% vs 111%); and 3) a considerable increase in end-systolic pressure (134% vs 144%). CONCLUSIONS: In acute CS supported by VA ECMO, atrial septostomy is an effective LV unloading tool. LV pressure is a key component of LV work load, so whenever LV work reduction is a priority, arterial pressure should carefully be titrated low while maintaining organ perfusion.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a modely nemocí na zvířatech $7 D004195
- 650 12
- $a mimotělní membránová oxygenace $x metody $7 D015199
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a kardiogenní šok $x diagnóza $x terapie $7 D012770
- 650 _2
- $a prasata $7 D013552
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a vena cava superior $7 D014683
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Meani, Paolo $u Department of Cardiovascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy; Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Heart & Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Cotza, Mauro $u Department of Cardiovascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Kowalewski, Mariusz $u Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Heart & Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Raffa, Giuseppe Maria $u Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Heart & Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department for the Treatment and Study of Cardiothoracic Diseases and Cardiothoracic Transplantation, IRCCS-ISMETT, Palermo, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Kuriscak, Eduard $u Department of Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Popkova, Michaela $u Department of Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Pilato, Michele $u Intensive Care Unit, Department for the Treatment and Study of Cardiothoracic Diseases and Cardiothoracic Transplantation, Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies, Palermo, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Arcadipane, Antonio $u Intensive Care Unit, Department for the Treatment and Study of Cardiothoracic Diseases and Cardiothoracic Transplantation, Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies, Palermo, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Ranucci, Marco $u Department of Cardiovascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
- 700 1_
- $a Lorusso, Roberto $u Department of Cardiovascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy; Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Belohlavek, Jan $u Department of Physiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; 2nd Department of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00186218 $t JACC. Cardiovascular interventions $x 1876-7605 $g Roč. 14, č. 24 (2021), s. 2698-2707
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34949394 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220425 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220506131249 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1789308 $s 1162832
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 14 $c 24 $d 2698-2707 $e 20211227 $i 1876-7605 $m JACC. Cardiovascular interventions $n JACC Cardiovasc Interv $x MED00186218
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220425