-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Immunohistochemical biomarkers are prognostic relevant in addition to the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification in endometrial cancer
SW. Vrede, WJ. van Weelden, NCM. Visser, J. Bulten, LJM. van der Putten, K. van de Vijver, M. Santacana, E. Colas, A. Gil-Moreno, CP. Moiola, G. Mancebo, C. Krakstad, J. Trovik, IS. Haldorsen, J. Huvila, M. Koskas, V. Weinberger, M. Bednarikova,...
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie
- MeSH
- analýza přežití MeSH
- kohortové studie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lymfatické metastázy MeSH
- molekula buněčné adheze nervové L1 metabolismus MeSH
- nádorové biomarkery metabolismus MeSH
- nádory endometria diagnóza mortalita patologie MeSH
- prediktivní hodnota testů MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
OBJECTIVE: Pre-operative immunohistochemical (IHC) biomarkers are not incorporated in endometrial cancer (EC) risk classification. We aim to investigate the added prognostic relevance of IHC biomarkers to the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification and lymph node (LN) status in EC. METHODS: Retrospective multicenter study within the European Network for Individualized Treatment of Endometrial Cancer (ENITEC), analyzing pre-operative IHC expression of p53, L1 cell-adhesion molecule (L1CAM), estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), and relate to ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk groups, LN status and outcome. RESULTS: A total of 763 EC patients were included with a median follow-up of 5.5-years. Abnormal IHC expression was present for p53 in 112 (14.7%), L1CAM in 79 (10.4%), ER- in 76 (10.0%), and PR- in 138 (18.1%) patients. Abnormal expression of p53/L1CAM/ER/PR was significantly related with higher risk classification groups, and combined associated with the worst outcome within the 'high and advanced/metastatic' risk group. In multivariate analysis p53-abn, ER/PR- and ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO 'high and advanced/metastatic' were independently associated with reduced disease-specific survival (DSS). Patients with abnormal IHC expression and lymph node metastasis (LNM) had the worst outcome. Patients with LNM and normal IHC expression had comparable outcome with patients without LNM and abnormal IHC expression. CONCLUSION: The use of pre-operative IHC biomarkers has important prognostic relevance in addition to the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification and in addition to LN status. For daily clinical practice, p53/L1CAM/ER/PR expression could serve as indicator for surgical staging and refine selective adjuvant treatment by incorporation into the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification.
Centre for Cancer Biomarkers Department of Clinical Science University of Bergen Bergen Norway
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital Nijmegen the Netherlands
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department Bichat Claude Bernard Hospital Paris France
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Haukeland University Hospital Bergen Norway
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hospital del Mar PSMAR Barcelona Spain
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Radboud university medical center Nijmegen the Netherlands
Department of Oncology KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
Department of Pathology Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital Nijmegen the Netherlands
Department of Pathology Elisabeth TweeSteden Hospital Tilburg the Netherlands
Department of Pathology Ghent University Hospital Cancer Research Institute Ghent Ghent Belgium
Department of Pathology Radboud university medical center Nijmegen the Netherlands
Department of Pathology Stichting PAMM Eindhoven the Netherlands
Department of Pathology University Hospital in Brno and Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Department of Pathology University of Turku Turku Finland
Department of Radiation Oncology Radboud university medical center Nijmegen the Netherlands
Gynecological Department Vall Hebron University Hospital CIBERONC Barcelona Spain
Pathology Department Vall Hebron University Hospital CIBERONC Barcelona Spain
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc22012419
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20220506125921.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 220425s2021 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.03.031 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)33858677
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Vrede, S W $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: stephanie.vrede@radboudumc.nl
- 245 10
- $a Immunohistochemical biomarkers are prognostic relevant in addition to the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification in endometrial cancer / $c SW. Vrede, WJ. van Weelden, NCM. Visser, J. Bulten, LJM. van der Putten, K. van de Vijver, M. Santacana, E. Colas, A. Gil-Moreno, CP. Moiola, G. Mancebo, C. Krakstad, J. Trovik, IS. Haldorsen, J. Huvila, M. Koskas, V. Weinberger, M. Bednarikova, J. Hausnerova, AA. van der Wurff, X. Matias-Guiu, F. Amant, ENITEC Consortium, MPLM. Snijders, HVN. Küsters-Vandevelde, C. Reijnen, JMA. Pijnenborg
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: Pre-operative immunohistochemical (IHC) biomarkers are not incorporated in endometrial cancer (EC) risk classification. We aim to investigate the added prognostic relevance of IHC biomarkers to the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification and lymph node (LN) status in EC. METHODS: Retrospective multicenter study within the European Network for Individualized Treatment of Endometrial Cancer (ENITEC), analyzing pre-operative IHC expression of p53, L1 cell-adhesion molecule (L1CAM), estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), and relate to ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk groups, LN status and outcome. RESULTS: A total of 763 EC patients were included with a median follow-up of 5.5-years. Abnormal IHC expression was present for p53 in 112 (14.7%), L1CAM in 79 (10.4%), ER- in 76 (10.0%), and PR- in 138 (18.1%) patients. Abnormal expression of p53/L1CAM/ER/PR was significantly related with higher risk classification groups, and combined associated with the worst outcome within the 'high and advanced/metastatic' risk group. In multivariate analysis p53-abn, ER/PR- and ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO 'high and advanced/metastatic' were independently associated with reduced disease-specific survival (DSS). Patients with abnormal IHC expression and lymph node metastasis (LNM) had the worst outcome. Patients with LNM and normal IHC expression had comparable outcome with patients without LNM and abnormal IHC expression. CONCLUSION: The use of pre-operative IHC biomarkers has important prognostic relevance in addition to the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification and in addition to LN status. For daily clinical practice, p53/L1CAM/ER/PR expression could serve as indicator for surgical staging and refine selective adjuvant treatment by incorporation into the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a nádorové biomarkery $x metabolismus $7 D014408
- 650 _2
- $a kohortové studie $7 D015331
- 650 _2
- $a nádory endometria $x diagnóza $x mortalita $x patologie $7 D016889
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a lymfatické metastázy $7 D008207
- 650 _2
- $a molekula buněčné adheze nervové L1 $x metabolismus $7 D039842
- 650 _2
- $a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
- 650 _2
- $a prognóza $7 D011379
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
- 650 _2
- $a analýza přežití $7 D016019
- 651 _2
- $a Evropa $7 D005060
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 700 1_
- $a van Weelden, W J $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Visser, N C M $u Department of Pathology, Stichting PAMM, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Bulten, J $u Department of Pathology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a van der Putten, L J M $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a van de Vijver, K $u Department of Pathology, Ghent University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium
- 700 1_
- $a Santacana, M $u Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLleida, CIBERONC, Lleida, Spain
- 700 1_
- $a Colas, E $u Biomedical Research Group in Gynaecology, Vall Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
- 700 1_
- $a Gil-Moreno, A $u Gynecological Department, Vall Hebron University Hospital, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain; Pathology Department, Vall Hebron University Hospital, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
- 700 1_
- $a Moiola, C P $u Biomedical Research Group in Gynaecology, Vall Hebron Institute of Research, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, CIBERONC, Barcelona, Spain
- 700 1_
- $a Mancebo, G $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital del Mar, PSMAR, Barcelona, Spain
- 700 1_
- $a Krakstad, C $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- 700 1_
- $a Trovik, J $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- 700 1_
- $a Haldorsen, I S $u Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Mohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre, Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- 700 1_
- $a Huvila, J $u Department of Pathology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- 700 1_
- $a Koskas, M $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Paris, France
- 700 1_
- $a Weinberger, V $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital in Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Bednarikova, M $u Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital in Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Hausnerova, J $u Department of Pathology, University Hospital in Brno and Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a van der Wurff, A A $u Department of Pathology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Matias-Guiu, X $u Department of Pathology and Molecular Genetics and Research Laboratory, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, University of Lleida, IRBLleida, CIBERONC, Lleida, Spain
- 700 1_
- $a Amant, F $u Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute and Amsterdam Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Snijders, M P L M $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Küsters-Vandevelde, H V N $u Department of Pathology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Reijnen, C $u Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- 700 1_
- $a Pijnenborg, J M A $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
- 710 2_
- $a ENITEC Consortium
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001958 $t Gynecologic oncology $x 1095-6859 $g Roč. 161, č. 3 (2021), s. 787-794
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33858677 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20220425 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20220506125913 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1789845 $s 1163620
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2021 $b 161 $c 3 $d 787-794 $e 20210412 $i 1095-6859 $m Gynecologic oncology $n Gynecol Oncol $x MED00001958
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20220425
